METHOD FOR FORMULATING PRODUCT END-OF-LIFE STRATEGIES FOR ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY

This paper describes the structured methodology for formulating end-of-life strategies, using specific examples from consumer electronics products. The End-of-Life Design Advisor (ELDA), a web based tool, was developed to determine what end-of-life strategy is possible according to the products' technical characteristics. The classification of end-of-life strategies is compared with current industry practice, in order to evaluate and validate the method. ELDA succeeded in classifying end-of-life strategies in agreement with industry best practices for 86% of the products. This ability to classify end-of-life strategies enables designers to redesign products that move to end-of-life strategies with lower environmental impact. This paper also presents preliminary work on the calculation of the environmental impact of the end-of-life strategies, through a model called End-of-Life Strategy Environmental Impact Model (ELSEIM). By understanding better the end-of-life strategy appropriate for the product, the research results can help designers develop appropriate (and profitable) end-of-life strategies for their unique position, systematically.

[1]  Dong-Ho Lee,et al.  Disassembly planning and scheduling: Review and further research , 2001 .

[2]  David J. Williams,et al.  The strategic and competitive implications of recycling and design for disassembly in the electronics industry , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and The Environment.

[3]  K. Masui,et al.  Development of products embedded disassembly process based on end-of-life strategies , 1999, Proceedings First International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing.

[4]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Computer-Aided Design for Product De- and Remanufacture , 2001 .

[5]  K. Feldmann,et al.  Determination and evaluation of the optimal end of life strategy for products based on simulation of disassembly and recycling , 1997 .

[6]  K. Masui,et al.  How product characteristics determine end-of-life strategies , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE - 1998 (Cat. No.98CH36145).

[7]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  A petri net approach to disassembly process planning , 1998 .

[8]  Demond Miller,et al.  Green Marketing: Opportunity for Innovation , 1998 .

[9]  Surendra M. Gupta,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS AND RECYCLING/DISASSEMBLY EFFORTS IN THE ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY , 1997 .

[10]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Disassembly Petri net approach to modeling and planning disassembly processes of electronic products , 1998, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. ISEE - 1998 (Cat. No.98CH36145).

[11]  C. M. Rose,et al.  A new approach to end-of-life design advisor (ELDA) , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.00CH37082).

[12]  Ab Stevels,et al.  Metrics for end-of-life strategies (ELSEIM) , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment. 2001 IEEE ISEE (Cat. No.01CH37190).

[13]  Askiner Gungor,et al.  Issues in environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a survey , 1999 .

[14]  Kosuke Ishii,et al.  PRODUCT END-OF-LIFE STRATEGY CATEGORIZATION DESIGN TOOL , 1999 .

[15]  Casper Boks,et al.  Environmentally weighted recycling quotes-better justifiable and environmentally more correct , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment (Cat. No.00CH37082).