Analysis of Strongly Programmed Workplace Environments : Architectural configuration and time-space properties of hospital work

Finding relations between configuration and activity of the level found in cities in strongly programmed buildings have challenged research for a long time. With increasing clarity, it has shown to have to do with how and where activity takes place. Compared to cities and large public complexes, workplaces are more centred around specific locations and the activities in them, whereas streets are more defined by movement between spaces exterior to the street system (i.e. between interior spaces). One reason for this difference is the time spent moving versus the time spent on specific locations, but also the way in which certain ranges of movement and activity is more programmed within workplaces than in cities. Most of this is well known within the field. What this paper adds to the discussion is a study of different spatializations of workflow of different roles and for different tasks. The paper does this through the concept of spatial practice, which is considered as the interplay between spatial configuration, organizational configuration, and the configuration of work processes and routines. In this way some conditions of workplace programs are brought to the forefront, and workplace distribution and organisation routines are discussed through direct and indirect benefits of different practices, as well as internal and external conditions of programs or tasks. The basis for the work is empirical studies of several hospital units within one large scale university hospital, offering a manageable variation of workflow and spatial configuration.

[1]  Craig Zimring,et al.  Targeted Visibility Analysis in Buildings Correlating Targeted Visibility Analysis with Distribution of People and Their Interactions within an Intensive Care Unit , 2009 .

[2]  Henrik Markhede,et al.  Spatial positioning : method development for spatial analysis of interaction in buildings , 2010 .

[3]  Daniel Koch Architecture Re-Configured , 2009 .

[4]  Anita Moum,et al.  Proceedings, CIB W70 Trondheim International Symposium Changing User Demands on Buildings, 12-14 June 2006 , 2006 .

[5]  A Turner,et al.  Depthmap: a program to perform visibility graph analysis , 2001 .

[6]  Ian McCulloh,et al.  Social networks and spatial configuration - How office layouts drive social interaction , 2012, Soc. Networks.

[7]  Torsten Hägerstrand,et al.  Om tidens vidd och tingens ordning , 1991 .

[8]  Ruth Dalton,et al.  Solutions for Visibility Accessibility and Signage Problems via Layered Graphs , 2009 .

[9]  Henrik Mattsson How does knowledge production take place? : On locating and mapping science and similar unruly activities , 2006 .

[10]  Jesper Steen,et al.  Analysing open space offices , 2006 .

[11]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts , 1983 .

[12]  Bill Hillier,et al.  Space is the machine: A configurational theory of architecture , 1996 .

[13]  Henri Lefebvre The production of space , 1992 .

[14]  Kali Tzortzi,et al.  MUSEUM BUILDING DESIGN AND EXHIBITION LAYOUT , 2007 .

[15]  Alan Penn,et al.  Towards an Architectural Theory of Space and Organisations: Cognitive, Affective and Conative Relations in Workplaces , 2010 .

[16]  Daniel Koch,et al.  Positioning Analysis : social structures in configurative modelling , 2007 .

[17]  Jesper Steen,et al.  Spatial and social configurations in offices , 2009 .

[18]  Daniel Koch,et al.  Architectural Fashion Magazines , 2009 .

[19]  Alan Penn,et al.  The Space of Innovation: Interaction and Communication in the Work Environment , 1999 .

[20]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  A Modeling Approach for Estimating the Impact of Spatial Configuration on Nurses' Movement , 2009 .

[21]  Y K Choi The Morphology of Exploration and Encounter in Museum Layouts , 1999 .

[22]  Jean Wineman,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Layout upon Visitors' Spatial Behaviors in Open Plan Exhibition Settings , 2004 .