Providing Performance Feedback to Teachers: A Review

Teacher preparation programs are under scrutiny for their role in the troubled American educational system. Thus, teacher educators must encourage teachers to use effective teaching practices. One technique for increasing use of effective practices is providing feedback to teachers on both newly acquired and ingrained teaching behaviors. To determine attributes of effective performance feedback, a systematic search for empirical literature was completed. Analysis of the ten identified studies indicates attributes of feedback that have been studied fall into categories of (a) nature of feedback, (b) temporal dimensions of feedback, and (c) who gives feedback. Through this review, attributes of feedback were classified as either promising or effective practice in changing specific teaching behaviors. Only immediate feedback was identified as an effective attribute. Promising practices for feedback to teachers included feedback that was specific, positive, and/or corrective. These findings, recommendations and directions for additional research in feedback and teacher preparation are discussed.

[1]  Carolyn D. Lavely.  Actual Incidence of Incompetent Teachers. , 1992 .

[2]  J. Brophy.  Teacher behavior and student achievement , 1984 .

[3]  R. Schumacker.  Rasch Rating Scale Analysis of Quality Indicators of Elementary and Secondary School Performance. , 1991 .

[4]  Linda L. Lenk,et al.  Preservice Training: The Role of Field-Based Experiences in the Preparation of Effective Special Educators , 1992 .

[5]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Direct Instruction , 1998 .

[6]  P. Lindsey,et al.  The Quest for Teachers: On Reviewing A Decade of Reform Efforts , 1995 .

[7]  L. Maheady,et al.  The Effects of Reciprocal Peer Coaching on Preservice General Educators' Instruction of Students with Special Learning Needs , 1999 .

[8]  C. S. Englert.  Measuring Special Education Teacher Effectiveness , 1983 .

[9]  T. Sharpe,et al.  Description and effects of sequential behavior practice in teacher education. , 1997, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[10]  J. Knowles,et al.  Personal, Professional and Contextual Circumstances of Student Teachers Who "Fail": Setting a Course for Understanding Failure in Teacher Education , 1993 .

[11]  P. Alberto,et al.  Applied behavior analysis for teachers , 1982 .

[12]  C. Salzberg,et al.  Peer Coaching in a Preservice Special Education Program , 1992 .

[13]  一紀 正路.  Pennsylvania State Universityに留学して , 1975 .

[14]  C. Greenwood,et al.  Measurable Change in Student Performance: Forgotten Standard in Teacher Preparation? , 1997 .

[15]  Ronda R. Menlove,et al.  Effects of Peer Coaching on the Acquisition of Direct Instruction Skills by Low-Performing Preservice Teachers , 1994 .

[16]  Frank W. Kohler,et al.  Effects of Peer Coaching on Teacher and Student Outcomes. , 1997 .

[17]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Teaching Systematic Instruction Competencies to Special Education Student Teachers: An Applied Behavioral Supervision Model , 1992 .

[18]  Virginia Richardson,et al.  Handbook of Research on Teaching , 2001 .

[19]  N. Marchand-Martella,et al.  Evaluation of Preservice Teachers' Interactive Teaching Skills in a Direct Instruction Practicum Using Student Teachers as Supervisors , 1993 .

[20]  G. Sugai,et al.  Teacher Training , 1983 .

[21]  R. Douglas Greer,et al.  Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction? , 1991 .

[22]  L. Polsgrove,et al.  Differential Effects of Feedback on Preservice Teacher Behavior , 1988 .

[23]  C. Myers.  Educational Psychology , 1904, Nature.

[24]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  What We Know About Using Research Findings , 1997, Journal of learning disabilities.

[25]  T. Pierce,et al.  Using Peer Coaching in Preservice Practica , 1994 .

[26]  R V Hall,et al.  The effects of experimenter's instructions, feedback, and praise on teacher praise and student attending behavior. , 1973, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[27]  Joseph J. Stowitschek,et al.  Modifying Preschool Teaching Behavior Through Telecommunications and Graphic Feedback , 1987 .

[28]  C. Griffin,et al.  Framing the Problems of Practice: The Effects of Self-Assessment in a Study of Special Education Students' Internships , 1995 .

[29]  B. Showers,et al.  Teachers Coaching Teachers. , 1985 .

[30]  Edwin S. Ellis,et al.  Research Synthesis on Effective Teaching Principles and the Design of Quality Tools for Educators. Technical Report No. 5. , 1994 .

[31]  Russell Gersten.  Recent Advances in Instructional Research for Students with Learning Disabilities: An Overview. , 1998 .

[32]  L. Maheady,et al.  The Pair Tutoring Program: An Early Field-Based Experience to Prepare Preservice General Educators to Work with Students with Special Learning Needs , 1996 .

[33]  S. Hollon,et al.  Defining empirically supported therapies. , 1998, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[34]  Mark F. O’Reilly,et al.  An Analysis of Acquisition, Generalization and Maintenance of Systematic Instruction Competencies by Preservice Teachers Using Behavioral Supervision Techniques. , 1994 .

[35]  Martha Thurlow,et al.  Critical Issues in Special Education , 1991 .

[36]  E. Eisner.  Educational Reform and the Ecology of Schooling. , 1992 .

[37]  C. Giebelhaus.  The Mechanical Third Ear Device: A Student Teaching Supervision Alternative , 1994 .

[38]  Russell Gersten,et al.  Close to the Classroom is Close to the Bone: Coaching as a Means to Translate Research into Classroom Practice , 1995 .

[39]  R. Houten.  Learning through feedback , 1980 .