An Astronomical Image Content-based Recommendation System Using Combined Deep Learning Models in a Fully Unsupervised Mode

We have developed a method that maps large astronomical images onto a two-dimensional map and clusters them. A combination of various state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms is used to develop a fully unsupervised image-quality assessment and clustering system. Our pipeline consists of a data pre-processing step where individual image objects are identified in a large astronomical image and converted to smaller pixel images. This data is then fed to a deep convolutional auto-encoder jointly trained with a self-organizing map (SOM). This part can be used as a recommendation system. The resulting output is eventually mapped onto a two-dimensional grid using a second, deep, SOM. We use data taken from ground-based telescopes and, as a case study, compare the system’s ability and performance with the results obtained by supervised methods presented by Teimoorinia et al. The availability of target labels in this data allowed for a comprehensive performance comparison between our unsupervised and supervised methods. In addition to image-quality assessments performed in this project, our method can have various other applications. For example, it can help experts label images in a considerably shorter time with minimum human intervention. It can also be used as a content-based recommendation system capable of filtering images based on the desired content.

[1]  Christopher J. Conselice,et al.  Galaxy Merger Rates up to z ∼ 3 Using a Bayesian Deep Learning Model: A Major-merger Classifier Using IllustrisTNG Simulation Data , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  Daniel Durand,et al.  Assessment of Astronomical Images Using Combined Machine-learning Models , 2020, The Astronomical Journal.

[3]  Sebastien Fabbro,et al.  Comparison of Multi-class and Binary Classification Machine Learning Models in Identifying Strong Gravitational Lenses , 2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[4]  R. Maiolino,et al.  Are galactic star formation and quenching governed by local, global, or environmental phenomena? , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[5]  Jorge Moreno,et al.  Deep learning predictions of galaxy merger stage and the importance of observational realism , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[6]  Heinz Andernach,et al.  Radio Galaxy Zoo: Unsupervised Clustering of Convolutionally Auto-encoded Radio-astronomical Images , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

[7]  Annalisa Pillepich,et al.  The Hubble Sequence at z ∼ 0 in the IllustrisTNG simulation with deep learning , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  A. K. Qin,et al.  Finding high-redshift strong lenses in DES using convolutional neural networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[9]  Jianhua Liu,et al.  Deep Sparse Autoencoder for Feature Extraction and Diagnosis of Locomotive Adhesion Status , 2018, J. Control. Sci. Eng..

[10]  H. Teimoorinia,et al.  Classifying galaxy spectra at 0.5 < z < 1 with self-organizing maps , 2018, 1805.07845.

[11]  Asantha Cooray,et al.  LensFlow: A Convolutional Neural Network in Search of Strong Gravitational Lenses , 2017, 1705.05857.

[12]  Sara L. Ellison,et al.  An Artificial Neural Network Approach For Ranking Quenching Parameters In Central Galaxies , 2016, 1601.01258.

[13]  Sara L. Ellison,et al.  The infrared luminosities of ∼332 000 SDSS galaxies predicted from artificial neural networks and the Herschel Stripe 82 survey , 2015, 1509.09004.

[14]  Sara L. Ellison,et al.  Artificial neural network based calibrations for the prediction of galactic [N ii] λ6584 and Hα line luminosities , 2014, 1401.7384.

[15]  H. Teimoorinia,et al.  SPECTRAL CLASSIFICATION OF GALAXIES AT 0.5 ⩽ z ⩽ 1 IN THE CDFS: THE ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK APPROACH , 2012 .

[16]  Gary G. Yen Self-Organizing Maps , 2011, Intelligent Systems.

[17]  J. Singal,et al.  Design and development of the 3.2 gigapixel camera for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[18]  S. Trippe,et al.  MICADO: the E-ELT adaptive optics imaging camera , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Stephen. D. J. Gwyn,et al.  MegaPipe: The MegaCam Image Stacking Pipeline at the Canadian Astronomical Data Centre , 2007, 0710.0370.

[20]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[21]  M. Skrutskie,et al.  The Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS) , 2006 .

[22]  J.Lee,et al.  THE DARK ENERGY CAMERA , 2004, The Dark Energy Survey.

[23]  A. Szalay,et al.  SDSS data management and photometric quality assessment , 2004, astro-ph/0410195.

[24]  Stephan Aune,et al.  MegaCam: the new Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope wide-field imaging camera , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[25]  E. Bertin,et al.  SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .

[26]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  A. Moorwood,et al.  Instrument Design and Performance for Optical/Infrared Ground-based Telescopes, , 2003 .

[28]  T. Kohonen Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .