A utility concession curve data fitting model for quantitative analysis of negotiation styles

A reciprocal function is proposed for defining the utility concession curve of a negotiation participant. The curve has only one free parameter and can fit the complete range of negotiation styles from extremely competitive to extremely collaborative. Various equations are derived, including the definition of a utility concession curve center which permits intuitive quantifying of a utility concession curve. Subsequently, an optimization model is proposed to fit the curve to a set of offers. Using the proposed model, a set of negotiations is mined for utility concession curves which are then used for clustering and hypothesis testing. Three negotiations styles seem to emerge from the data; slightly collaborative, neutral and quite competitive. It is also shown quantitatively that the level of competitiveness of the counterpart is negatively correlated with the agreement rate, and this is validated against the experimental treatment. Additionally, by the use of an experimental treatment, it is shown that the level of competitiveness of the counterpart has a positive causal impact on the negotiator's style, causing him to become more competitive or collaborative. The data fitting model can also be used for incrementally fitting the curve in real-time during a negotiation to provide an estimate of the negotiation style which may help in the negotiation process.

[1]  Douglas Steinley,et al.  K-means clustering: a half-century synthesis. , 2006, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[2]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Predicting opponent's moves in electronic negotiations using neural networks , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  R. Fletcher.  Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[4]  R. Kilmann,et al.  Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument , 1977 .

[5]  George S Sebestyen,et al.  Decision-making processes in pattern recognition (ACM monograph series) , 1962 .

[6]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[7]  Katia P. Sycara,et al.  Bayesian learning in negotiation , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Ralph Arnote,et al.  Hong Kong (China) , 1996, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project.

[10]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  Evaluations of Tactics for Automated Negotiations , 2008 .

[11]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  George S. Sebestyen,et al.  Decision-making processes in pattern recognition , 1962 .

[13]  Pattie Maes,et al.  Kasbah: An Agent Marketplace for Buying and Selling Goods , 1996, PAAM.

[14]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  Shaman: Software and Human Agents in Multiattribute Auctions and Negotiations , 2006, Negotiation, Auctions, and Market Engineering.

[15]  Julita Vassileva,et al.  Bilateral Negotiation with Incomplete and Uncertain Information: A Decision-Theoretic Approach Using a Model of the Opponent , 2000, CIA.

[16]  Jørn K. Rognes,et al.  Can individualists and cooperators play together? The effect of mixed social motives in negotiations , 2011 .

[17]  Arie Segev,et al.  Automated Negotiations: A Survey of the State of the Art , 1997, Wirtschaftsinf..

[18]  Ryszard Kowalczyk,et al.  Adaptive Negotiation with On-Line Prediction of Opponent Behaviour in Agent-Based Negotiations , 2006, 2006 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology.

[19]  Pattie Maes,et al.  A Real-Life Experiment in Creating an Agent Marketplace , 1997, Software Agents and Soft Computing.

[20]  Bharat Bhasker,et al.  Quickly locating efficient, equitable deals in automated negotiations under two-sided information uncertainty , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[21]  Loren Paul Rees,et al.  Using Autonomous Software Agents to Create the Next Generation of Decision Support Systems , 2000, Decis. Sci..

[22]  J. MacQueen.  Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations , 1967 .

[23]  Wei-Po Lee,et al.  Towards agent-based decision making in the electronic marketplace: interactive recommendation and automated negotiation , 2004, Expert Syst. Appl..

[24]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Negotiation decision functions for autonomous agents , 1998, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[25]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Optimal Negotiation Strategies for Agents with Incomplete Information , 2001, ATAL.

[26]  Vicent J. Botti,et al.  Evolutionary-aided negotiation model for bilateral bargaining in Ambient Intelligence domains with complex utility functions , 2013, Inf. Sci..

[27]  Shih-Ping Han.  A globally convergent method for nonlinear programming , 1975 .

[28]  H. P. Sims,et al.  BARGAINING BEHAVIOR IN A BUSINESS SIMULATION GAME , 1978 .

[29]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Pairwise issue modeling for negotiation counteroffer prediction using neural networks , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  Kuldeep Kumar,et al.  Agent-based negotiation and decision making for dynamic supply chain formation , 2009, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[31]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[32]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an , 1997 .

[33]  Fu-Ren Lin,et al.  The design and evaluation of an intelligent sales agent for online persuasion and negotiation , 2007, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[34]  H. Kelley,et al.  Social interaction basis of cooperators' and competitors' beliefs about others. , 1970 .

[35]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Determining successful negotiation strategies: an evolutionary approach , 1998, Proceedings International Conference on Multi Agent Systems (Cat. No.98EX160).

[36]  Chongming Hou.  Predicting agents tactics in automated negotiation , 2004 .