On the Inference of Functional Circadian Networks Using Granger Causality

Being able to infer one way direct connections in an oscillatory network such as the suprachiastmatic nucleus (SCN) of the mammalian brain using time series data is difficult but crucial to understanding network dynamics. Although techniques have been developed for inferring networks from time series data, there have been no attempts to adapt these techniques to infer directional connections in oscillatory time series, while accurately distinguishing between direct and indirect connections. In this paper an adaptation of Granger Causality is proposed that allows for inference of circadian networks and oscillatory networks in general called Adaptive Frequency Granger Causality (AFGC). Additionally, an extension of this method is proposed to infer networks with large numbers of cells called LASSO AFGC. The method was validated using simulated data from several different networks. For the smaller networks the method was able to identify all one way direct connections without identifying connections that were not present. For larger networks of up to twenty cells the method shows excellent performance in identifying true and false connections; this is quantified by an area-under-the-curve (AUC) 96.88%. We note that this method like other Granger Causality-based methods, is based on the detection of high frequency signals propagating between cell traces. Thus it requires a relatively high sampling rate and a network that can propagate high frequency signals.

[1]  Marc Timme,et al.  Inferring network topology from complex dynamics , 2010, 1007.1640.

[2]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing multiple spike trains with nonparametric granger causality , 2009, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[3]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Introduction to time series and forecasting , 1998 .

[4]  Ljupco Kocarev,et al.  Estimating topology of networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[5]  P. Tresco,et al.  A diffusible coupling signal from the transplanted suprachiasmatic nucleus controlling circadian locomotor rhythms , 1996, Nature.

[6]  Naoki Abe,et al.  Grouped graphical Granger modeling for gene expression regulatory networks discovery , 2009, Bioinform..

[7]  Joel D Levine,et al.  Signal analysis of behavioral and molecular cycles , 2002, BMC Neuroscience.

[8]  Michal Linial,et al.  Using Bayesian Networks to Analyze Expression Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[9]  Arkady Pikovsky,et al.  Network reconstruction from random phase resetting. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[10]  Gary D. Stormo,et al.  Modeling Regulatory Networks with Weight Matrices , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[11]  Markus Lappe,et al.  Time-Delayed Mutual Information of the Phase as a Measure of Functional Connectivity , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  S. Yamaguchi,et al.  Synchronization of Cellular Clocks in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus , 2003, Science.

[13]  R. Shanmugam Introduction to Time Series and Forecasting , 1997 .

[14]  Helmut Ltkepohl,et al.  New Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis , 2007 .

[15]  Yihong Yang,et al.  Evaluating the effective connectivity of resting state networks using conditional Granger causality , 2010, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  Erik D Herzog,et al.  Small-World Network Models of Intercellular Coupling Predict Enhanced Synchronization in the Suprachiasmatic Nucleus , 2009, Journal of biological rhythms.

[17]  Marc Timme,et al.  Revealing network connectivity from response dynamics. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[18]  Albert Díaz-Guilera,et al.  Extracting topological features from dynamical measures in networks of Kuramoto oscillators. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  M. W. Young,et al.  A light‐independent oscillatory gene mPer3 in mouse SCN and OVLT , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[20]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[21]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Using Graphical Models and Genomic Expression Data to Statistically Validate Models of Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2000, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[22]  R. Tibshirani Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso , 1996 .

[23]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Toward a detailed computational model for the mammalian circadian clock , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Linda R Petzold,et al.  Wavelet Measurement Suggests Cause of Period Instability in Mammalian Circadian Neurons , 2011, Journal of biological rhythms.

[25]  Daniel B. Forger,et al.  An opposite role for tau in circadian rhythms revealed by mathematical modeling. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Evaluating causal relations in neural systems: Granger causality, directed transfer function and statistical assessment of significance , 2001, Biological Cybernetics.

[27]  S. Bressler,et al.  Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: directional influences revealed by Granger causality. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Hanspeter Herzel,et al.  Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks , 2010, Molecular systems biology.

[29]  M. A. Henson,et al.  A molecular model for intercellular synchronization in the mammalian circadian clock. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Patrik D'haeseleer,et al.  Linear Modeling of mRNA Expression Levels During CNS Development and Injury , 1998, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[31]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  Mingzhou Ding,et al.  Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality , 2008, NeuroImage.

[33]  Satchidananda Panda,et al.  Network Features of the Mammalian Circadian Clock , 2009, PLoS biology.

[34]  Erik D. Herzog,et al.  GABA Networks Destabilize Genetic Oscillations in the Circadian Pacemaker , 2013, Neuron.