Governing Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Bloch,et al. Competitive Research Grants and Their Impact on Career Performance , 2014, Minerva.
[2] Donald C. Pelz,et al. Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development , 1967 .
[3] Morgan Meyer,et al. Tales of Emergence—Synthetic Biology as a Scientific Community in the Making , 2009 .
[4] Jochen Gläser,et al. Evaluation Without Evaluators , 2007 .
[5] Martina Merz,et al. How Technological Platforms Reconfigure Science-Industry Relations: The Case of Micro- and Nanotechnology , 2010 .
[6] R. Whitley. Constructing universities as strategic actors : limitations and variations , 2008 .
[7] H. Nowotny. How Many Policy Rooms are There? , 2007 .
[8] David J. Hess,et al. Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalizaztion , 2007 .
[9] Lynn Dirk,et al. A Measure of Originality , 1999 .
[10] Hidden in Plain Sight: The Impact of Generic Governance on the Emergence of Research Fields , 2016 .
[11] Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al. Scientific Communities or Transepistemic Arenas of Research? A Critique of Quasi-Economic Models of Science , 1982 .
[12] Ismael Rafols,et al. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinarity. The case of innovation studies in business and management , 2011, ArXiv.
[13] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The Evaluation of National Performance in Selected Priority Areas using Scientometric Methods , 1996 .
[14] Ginger Polich,et al. Rare disease patient groups as clinical researchers. , 2012, Drug discovery today.
[15] Emanuela Reale,et al. A Comparative Approach to Higher Education Reforms in Western European Countries , 2009 .
[16] Phil Brown,et al. Embodied health movements: Responses to a "scientized" world , 2006 .
[17] Michèle Lamont,et al. What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? , 2004 .
[18] Grant Lewison,et al. The definition and calibration of biomedical subfields , 1999, Scientometrics.
[19] Ismael Rafols,et al. How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Stud , 2012 .
[20] Götz Hoeppe,et al. Working data together: The accountability and reflexivity of digital astronomical practice , 2014, Social studies of science.
[21] David H. Guston,et al. Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policy , 1996 .
[22] L. Bornmann,et al. Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes , 2008, PloS one.
[23] Jeffrey L. Furman,et al. Growing Stem Cells: The Impact of Federal Funding Policy on the US Scientific Frontier , 2012 .
[24] Catherine Paradeise,et al. University governance : Western European comparative perspectives , 2009 .
[25] S. Epstein. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge , 1998 .
[26] Jörg Neufeld,et al. Peer review-based selection decisions in individual research funding, applicants’ publication strategies and performance: The case of the ERC Starting Grants , 2013 .
[27] Hans-Jörg Reinberger. Experimental Systems: Historiality, Narration, and Deconstruction , 1994, Science in Context.
[28] Roberto Moscati,et al. Transforming A Centralised System Of Higher Education: Reform And Academic Resistance In Italy , 2008 .
[29] Harold Maurice Collins,et al. New Light on Old Boys: Cognitive and Institutional Particularism in the Peer Review System , 1991 .
[30] D. Braun. Who Governs Intermediary Agencies? Principal-Agent Relations in Research Policy-Making , 1993, Journal of Public Policy.
[31] G. Laudel,et al. Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding , 2014 .
[32] M. Merz,et al. The Local Configuration of New Research Fields , 2016 .
[33] Paul Wouters,et al. Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use : a literature review , 2016 .
[34] Shinn Terry,et al. Toward a New Dimension: Exploring the Nanoscale , 2014 .
[35] Gina Anderson. Mapping Academic Resistance in the Managerial University , 2008 .
[36] Teresa R. Behrens,et al. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome , 2001 .
[37] Marcela Linkova,et al. Unable to resist: Researchers’ responses to research assessment in the Czech Republic , 2013 .
[38] Grit Laudel,et al. Highly Adaptable but Not Invulnerable: Necessary and Facilitating Conditions for Research in Evolutionary Developmental Biology , 2014 .
[39] C. Hannaway. Biomedicine in the twentieth century: practices, policies and politics. , 2008 .
[40] L. Butler,et al. Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .
[41] Edward J. Hackett,et al. Essential Tensions , 2005 .
[42] Gwen Ottinger,et al. Undone Science: Charting Social Movement and Civil Society Challenges to Research Agenda Setting , 2010, Science, technology & human values.
[43] R. Whitley,et al. The Impact of Institutional Reforms on the Nature of Universities as Organisations , 2014 .
[44] M. Ins,et al. Different — not just by label: research-oriented academic careers in Germany , 2009 .
[45] Jochen Gläser,et al. Impact of evaluation-based funding on the production of scientific knowledge: What to worry about, and how to find out (Expertise for the German Ministry for Education and Research) , 2002 .
[46] Laura Cruz-Castro,et al. Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance , 2011, Scientometrics.
[47] D. Kleinman. Untangling Context: Understanding a University Laboratory in the Commercial World , 1998 .
[48] Anna Kosmützky,et al. Towards a multiversity?: universities between global trends and national traditions , 2006 .
[49] R. Whitley,et al. Reconfiguring Knowledge Production , 2010 .
[50] Caroline S. Wagner,et al. Evaluating transformative research programmes: A case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme , 2013 .
[51] C. Haeussler. Information-Sharing in Academia and the Industry: A Comparative Study , 2010 .
[52] Sarah de Rijcke,et al. Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University , 2015 .
[53] M. Henkel. Academic Identities and Policy Change in Higher Education , 2000 .
[54] Fiona E. Murray. The Oncomouse That Roared: Hybrid Exchange Strategies as a Source of Distinction at the Boundary of Overlapping Institutions1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.
[55] Jochen Gläser,et al. The Changing Governance of the Sciences , 2007 .
[56] P. V. D. Besselaar,et al. Comparing the evolution of national research policies: what patterns of change? , 2007 .
[57] K. Knorr-Cetina. The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1985 .
[58] D. Guston. Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .
[59] S. Frickel. Absences: Methodological Note about Nothing, in Particular , 2014 .
[60] R. Welsh. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power , 2008 .
[61] Keith Pavitt,et al. Key National Factors in the Emergence of Computational Chemistry Firms , 1997 .
[62] Katherine E. Smith. The politics of ideas: The complex interplay of health inequalities research and policy , 2014 .
[63] Nancy Beadie,et al. Creating the market university: how academic science became an economic engine , 2013 .
[64] Philip Shapira,et al. Identifying creative research accomplishments: Methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics , 2007, Scientometrics.
[65] K. Packer,et al. Patenting Culture in Science: Reinventing the Scientific Wheel of Credibility , 1996 .
[66] Benjamin Coriat,et al. Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems , 2002 .
[67] M. Henkel,et al. Changing relationships between higher education and the state , 1999 .
[68] D Blumenthal,et al. Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.
[69] Scott Counts,et al. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work , 2013, CSCW 2013.
[70] Theresa Velden,et al. Explaining field differences in openness and sharing in scientific communities , 2013, CSCW.
[71] Science Policy in Action: Policy and the Researcher , 2000 .
[72] Jochen Gläser,et al. EVALUATION WITHOUT EVALUATORS The Impact of Funding Formulae on Australian University Research , 2007 .
[73] Liv Langfeldt,et al. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2011 .
[74] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12 , 2014, Scientometrics.
[75] Stuart S. Blume. Toward a political sociology of science , 1974 .
[76] S. Krimsky. Do Financial Conflicts of Interest Bias Research? , 2013 .
[77] Ivar Bleiklie,et al. From governance to identity : a festschrift for Mary Henkel , 2008 .
[78] Éric Archambault,et al. Bibliometrics as a Performance Measurement Tool for Research Evaluation: The Case of Research Funded by the National Cancer Institute of Canada , 2010 .
[80] Carl Mitcham,et al. The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity , 2012 .
[81] M. H. Cooper,et al. Commercialization of the University and Problem Choice by Academic Biological Scientists , 2009 .
[82] Alice Lam. From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? , 2010 .
[83] Andrew Webster,et al. Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room , 2007 .
[84] Alexander Rushforth,et al. Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands , 2015, Minerva.
[85] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies , 1989, Scientometrics.
[86] U. Schmoch,et al. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields , 1998 .
[87] Matthias Gross,et al. The Unknown in Process , 2007 .
[88] Thomas Heinze,et al. How to sponsor ground-breaking research: a comparison of funding schemes , 2008 .
[90] Alice Lam,et al. From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries , 2009 .
[91] Lars Engwall,et al. Reconfiguring Knowledge Production: Changing Authority Relationships in the Sciences and their Consequences for Intellectual Innovation , 2010 .
[92] G. Laudel,et al. A bibliometric reconstruction of research trails for qualitative investigations of scientific innovations , 2015 .
[93] Terttu Luukkonen,et al. Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices , 2012 .
[94] W. Powell,et al. To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer , 2001 .
[95] Scott Frickel,et al. The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power , 2006 .
[96] Sheila Jasanoff,et al. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .
[97] Monica Gaughan,et al. Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding , 2002 .
[98] Philippe Aghion,et al. Of Mice and Academics: Examining the Effect of Openness on Innovation , 2009 .
[99] S. Sismondo. Publication Planning in the Medical Sciences , 2016 .
[100] D. Hess,et al. Science Studies and Activism , 2002 .
[101] N. Morris. Academic researchers as 'agents' of science policy , 2003 .
[102] C. Donovan,et al. The Australian Research Quality Framework: A live experiment in capturing the social, economic, environmental, and cultural returns of publicly funded research , 2008 .
[103] Brian A. Jacob,et al. The Impact of NIH Postdoctoral Training Grants on Scientific Productivity. , 2011, Research policy.
[104] Lisa Lucas,et al. The Research Game in Academic Life , 2006 .
[105] Jürgen Enders,et al. Do Spin-Offs Make the Academics’ Heads Spin? , 2010, Minerva.
[106] M. Eisler. “The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology”: Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma , 2013 .
[107] S. Woolgar,et al. The Manufacture of Knowledge: an Essay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science , 1982 .
[108] D. Braun,et al. The role of funding agencies in the cognitive development of science , 1998 .
[109] Jason Owen-Smith. Managing Laboratory Work through Skepticism: Processes of Evaluation and Control , 2001, American Sociological Review.
[110] Sergio Sismondo,et al. Ghosts in the Machine , 2009, Social studies of science.
[111] M. Schultz,et al. Informal Collaboration in R & D. The formation of Networks Across Organizations , 1993 .
[112] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. Communication between Science and Technology Studies Journals: A Case Study in Differentiation and Integration in Scientific Fields , 2000, Scientometrics.
[113] Greg Myers,et al. Writing biology : texts in the social construction of scientific knowledge , 1990 .
[114] Josh Lerner,et al. The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .
[115] B. Verspagen,et al. Knowledge flows : analyzing the core literature of innovation, entrepreneurship and science and technology studies , 2012 .
[116] B. Penders,et al. The Social Study of Corporate Science: A Research Manifesto , 2009 .
[117] Joan H. Fujimura,et al. Constructing `Do-able' Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment , 1987 .
[118] M. Perkmann,et al. Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations , 2009 .
[119] A. Rip. A cognitive approach to relevance of science , 1997 .
[120] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. The cognitive and the social structure of STS , 2001, Scientometrics.
[121] A. Hedgecoe,et al. Terminology and the Construction of Scientific Disciplines: The Case of Pharmacogenomics , 2003 .
[122] G. Laudel. The art of getting funded: How scientists adapt to their funding conditions , 2006 .
[123] M. Kearnes,et al. Tools of the Trade: UK Research Intermediaries and the Politics of Impacts , 2011 .
[124] David Blumenthal,et al. Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials , 2000 .
[125] Linking Theory and Practice: Introduction , 1998 .
[126] James A. Evans. Industry collaboration, scientific sharing, and the dissemination of knowledge , 2010 .
[127] Thaddeus R. Miller,et al. De-Facto Science Policy in the Making: How Scientists Shape Science Policy and Why it Matters (or, Why STS and STP Scholars Should Socialize) , 2013 .
[128] Stefan Lange. The Basic State of Research in Germany: Conditions of Knowledge Production Pre-Evaluation , 2007 .
[129] Steven P. Vallas,et al. Science, capitalism, and the rise of the “knowledge worker”: The changing structure of knowledge production in the United States , 2001 .
[130] J. Jankowski. Trends in Academic Research Spending, Alliances, and Commercialization , 1999 .
[131] D. Horrobin,et al. Peer review of grant applications: a harbinger for mediocrity in clinical research? , 1996, The Lancet.
[132] Liv Langfeldt,et al. The Decision-Making Constraints and Processes of Grant Peer Review, and Their Effects on the Review Outcome , 2001, Peer review in an Era of Evaluation.
[133] D. Hicks. Performance-based university research funding systems , 2012 .
[134] B. Martin. The Evolution of Science Policy and Innovation Studies , 2012 .
[135] J. R. Cole,et al. Chance and consensus in peer review. , 1981, Science.
[136] Donald F. Westerheijden,et al. Netherlands : An ‘Echternach’ Procession in Different Directions: Oscillating Steps Towards Reform , 2009 .
[137] U. Schimank,et al. Mission Now Possible , 2010 .
[138] Tiago Moreira,et al. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society , 2013 .
[139] Mediating Problem Choice: Academic Researchers' Responses to Changes in their Institutional Environment , 2010 .
[140] Hans-Jörg Rheinberger,et al. Comparing experimental systems: Protein synthesis in microbes and in animal tissue at Cambridge (Ernest F. Gale) and at the Massachusetts General Hospital (Paul C. Zamecnik), 1945–1960 , 1996, Journal of the history of biology.
[141] Wesley M. Cohen,et al. Where excludability matters: Material versus intellectual property in academic biomedical research , 2007 .
[142] A. Berezin,et al. The perils of centralized research funding systems , 1998 .
[143] Barend van der Meulen,et al. Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and science , 1998 .
[144] Ewan Ferlie,et al. The steering of higher education systems: a public management perspective , 2008 .
[145] J. Halfmann. :Alternative Pathways in Science and Industry: Activism, Innovation, and the Environment in an Era of Globalization , 2009 .
[146] John P. Walsh,et al. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Links and Impacts: The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[147] Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent,et al. Building Multidisciplinary Research Fields: The Cases of Materials Science, Nanotechnology and Synthetic Biology , 2016 .
[148] E. Shove. Principals, agents and research programmes , 2003 .
[149] James A. Evans. Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less about More1 , 2010, American Journal of Sociology.
[150] E. Hippel. Cooperation between Rivals: Informal Know-How Trading , 1987 .
[151] Marco Sabbadin. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .
[152] Aaron Panofsky. Generating sociability to drive science: Patient advocacy organizations and genetics research , 2011, Social studies of science.
[153] Gunnar Sivertsen,et al. Excellence and growth dynamics: A comparative study of the Matthew effect , 2015 .
[154] G. Laudel,et al. Where have All the Scientists Gone? Building Research Profiles at Dutch Universities and its Consequences for Research , 2014 .
[155] E. Berman,et al. Not Just Neoliberalism , 2014 .
[156] J. Grin,et al. The effects of a changing institutional environment on academic research practices: three cases from agricultural science , 2011 .
[157] L. Engwall,et al. Computer Corpus Linguistics: An Innovation in the Humanities , 2014 .
[158] Jochen Gläser,et al. The Limits of Universality: How Field-Specific Epistemic Conditions Affect Authority Relations and their Consequences. , 2010 .
[159] John A. Remington. Beyond Big Science in America: The Binding of Inquiry , 1988 .
[160] Mark B. Brown. Politicizing science: Conceptions of politics in science and technology studies , 2015, Social studies of science.
[161] Jörg Neufeld,et al. Funding programmes for young scientists—Do the ‘best’ apply? , 2012 .
[162] R. Whitley,et al. Reconfiguring the Public Sciences: The Impact of Governance Changes on Authority and Innovation in Public Science Systems , 2010 .
[163] N. Morris. The developing role of departments , 2002 .
[164] Ben R. Martin,et al. Science and technology studies: exploring the knowledge base , 2011 .
[165] Michèle Lamont,et al. How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2009 .
[166] Reconfiguring the Public Sciences , 2010 .
[167] K. Pavitt,et al. CORPORATE ACTIVITIES IN SPEECH RECOGNITION AND NATURAL LANGUAGE: ANOTHER "NEW SCIENCE"-BASED TECHNOLOGY , 1999 .
[168] Giliberto Capano,et al. GOVERNMENT CONTINUES TO DO ITS JOB. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF GOVERNANCE SHIFTS IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SECTOR , 2011 .
[169] Richard Whitley,et al. How do Institutional Changes Affect Scientific Innovations? The Effects of Shifts in Authority Relationships, Protected Space, and Flexibility , 2014 .
[170] Jörg Neufeld,et al. Informed peer review and uninformed bibliometrics , 2011 .
[171] Peter van den Besselaar,et al. The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels , 2014 .
[172] R. Whitley. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .
[173] M. Henkel. Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment , 2005 .
[174] David H. Guston,et al. Principal-agent theory and research policy: An introduction , 2003 .
[175] R. Whitley,et al. Organizational Transformation and Scientific Change: The Impact of Institutional Restructuring on Universities and Intellectual Innovation , 2014 .
[176] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences , 2009, 0911.1306.
[177] D. Kleinman,et al. Routledge Handbook of Science, Technology and Society , 2014 .
[178] Katherine Smith. Research, policy and funding - academic treadmills and the squeeze on intellectual spaces. , 2010, The British journal of sociology.
[179] N. Tousignant. Broken tempos: Of means and memory in a Senegalese university laboratory , 2013 .
[180] Richard Whitley,et al. The Changing Governance of the Sciences : The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems , 2007 .
[181] Tereza Stöckelová. Immutable Mobiles Derailed: STS, Geopolitics, and Research Assessment , 2012 .
[182] K. Huutoniemi,et al. Communicating and compromising on disciplinary expertise in the peer review of research proposals , 2012 .
[183] T. Pinch. Confronting nature : the sociology of solar-neutrino detection , 1986 .
[184] T. Shinn,et al. Paths of commercial knowledge: Forms and consequences of university–enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms , 2006 .
[185] M. Lamont,et al. Beyond blind faith: overcoming the obstacles to interdisciplinary evaluation , 2006 .
[186] A. Rip. The republic of science in the 1990s , 1994 .
[187] Kaare Aagaard,et al. How incentives trickle down: Local use of a national bibliometric indicator system , 2015 .
[188] STS in Europe , 1999 .
[189] Arie Rip,et al. The Rise of Membrane Technology , 1998 .
[190] Paula E. Stephan,et al. Changing Incentives to Publish , 2011, Science.
[191] B. Latour,et al. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .
[192] U. Schimank,et al. ‘New Public Management’ and the Academic Profession: Reflections on the German Situation , 2005 .
[193] Sarah Trousset. Current Trends in Science and Technology Policy Research: An Examination of Published Works from 2010–2012 , 2014 .
[194] Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al. How Superorganisms Change: Consensus Formation and the Social Ontology of High-Energy Physics Experiments , 1995 .
[195] Arie Rip,et al. Umbrella terms as a conduit in the governance of emerging science and technology , 2013 .
[196] Chris Caswill. Principals, agents and contracts , 2003 .
[197] G. Laudel,et al. Cold Atom Gases, Hedgehogs, and Snakes: The Methodological Challenges of Comparing Scientific Things , 2015 .
[198] Sainath Suryanarayanan,et al. Dying Bees and the Social Production of Ignorance , 2013 .
[199] G. Laudel,et al. The Limits of Universality , 2010 .
[200] P. Shapira,et al. Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research , 2009 .
[201] Christine Musselin,et al. How peer review empowers the academic profession and university managers: Changes in relationships between the state, universities and the professoriate , 2013 .
[202] V. Meek. The transformation of Australian higher education from binary to unitary system , 1991 .
[203] S. Louvel. Changing Authority Relations within French Academic Research Units since the 1960s , 2010 .
[204] Kaare Aagaard,et al. Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator , 2015 .
[205] Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al. The evolution of research activity in Spain , 2003, Research Policy.
[206] S. Shipp,et al. Outcome Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director"s Pioneer Award (NDPA), FY 2004-2005 Final Report , 2011 .
[207] Diane Vaughan,et al. The Rôle of the Organization in the Production of Techno-Scientific Knowledge , 1999 .
[208] Arie Rip,et al. Regional Innovation Systems and the Advent of Strategic Science , 2002 .
[209] Keith Pavitt,et al. Public Policies to Support Basic Research: What Can the Rest of the World Learn from US Theory and Practice? (And What They Should Not Learn) , 2001 .
[210] G. Laudel,et al. Cold atoms - hot research: high risks, high rewards in five different authority structures , 2014 .
[211] A. Salter,et al. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .
[212] Jürgen Enders,et al. PUBLIC SECTOR REFORM IN DUTCH HIGHER EDUCATION: THE ORGANIZATIONAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE UNIVERSITY , 2007 .
[213] Nicola Baldini,et al. Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence , 2008, Scientometrics.
[214] Mika Nieminen,et al. University research funding and publication performance--An international comparison , 2010 .
[215] Brian Rappert,et al. Regimes of ordering: the commercialization of intellectual property in industrial-academic collaborations , 1997 .