Analysis of Temporal Mammogram Pairs to Detect and Characterise Mass Lesions.

[1]  J. Underwood.  General and Systematic Pathology , 2004 .

[2]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , 1995 .

[3]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computer-aided characterization of mammographic masses: accuracy of mass segmentation and its effects on characterization , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years. , 1992, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[5]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A regional registration method to find corresponding mass lesions in temporal mammogram pairs. , 2005, Medical physics.

[6]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[7]  Marc J. Homer,et al.  Mammographic Interpretation: A Practical Approach , 1991 .

[8]  I Andersson,et al.  Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmö Mammographic Screening Program. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[9]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Comparing Mammogram Pairs for the Detection of Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[10]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[11]  C. Boggis,et al.  The influence of previous films on screening mammographic interpretation and detection of breast carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical radiology.

[12]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Is screening for breast cancer with mammography justifiable? , 2000, The Lancet.

[13]  Eva Negri,et al.  Trends in mortality from major cancers in the European Union, including acceding countries, in 2004 , 2004, Cancer.

[14]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Mammography interpretation: the BI-RADS method. , 1997, American family physician.

[15]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  V. Jackson.  Screening mammography: controversies and headlines. , 2002, Radiology.

[17]  B Sahiner,et al.  A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[18]  M. J. van de Vijver,et al.  Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[20]  N. Obuchowski.  ROC analysis. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  Jonathan E. Fieldsend,et al.  Identification of masses in digital mammograms with MLP and RBF nets , 2000, Proceedings of the IEEE-INNS-ENNS International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. IJCNN 2000. Neural Computing: New Challenges and Perspectives for the New Millennium.

[22]  Gunnar Eklund,et al.  Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985 .

[23]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Deformable models in medical image analysis: a survey , 1996, Medical Image Anal..

[24]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Nation‐wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: Results of initial and subsequent screening 1990–1995 , 1998, International journal of cancer.

[25]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.

[26]  S. Feig,et al.  Developing asymmetric breast tissue. , 1999, Radiology.

[27]  J. Hendriks,et al.  Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review , 2003, The Lancet.

[28]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' characterization of malignant and benign breast masses on serial mammograms with computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 2004, Radiology.

[30]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[31]  L W Bassett,et al.  Obtaining previous mammograms for comparison: usefulness and costs. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Analysis of Changes in Masses Using Contrast and Size Measures , 2003 .

[33]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. , 2003, JAMA.

[34]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[35]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information. , 2002, Medical physics.

[36]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Sites of Occurrence of Malignancies in Mammograms , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[37]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Impact of computer-aided detection in a regional screening mammography program. , 2005, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[38]  B. Viták,et al.  Effect on sensitivity and specificity of mammography screening with or without comparison of old mammograms , 2000 .

[39]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. , 2004, Medical physics.

[40]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[41]  J. Heine,et al.  Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Part 2. Serial breast tissue change and related temporal influences. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[42]  N. Wald,et al.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening , 1995, BMJ.

[43]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1972 .

[44]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Using Information from Two Mammographic Views to Improve Computer-Aided Detection of Mass Lesions , 2003 .

[45]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[46]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Automated registration of breast lesions in temporal pairs of mammograms for interval change analysis--local affine transformation for improved localization. , 2001, Medical physics.

[47]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. , 2001, Medical physics.

[48]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[49]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. , 2006, Medical physics.

[50]  K. Boo-Chai,et al.  Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: The Malmo mammographic screening trial , 1990 .

[51]  Dragana P. Brzakovic,et al.  Detection of cancerous changes in mammograms using intensity and texture measures , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[52]  R. Tarone,et al.  Analysis of breast cancer mortality and stage distribution by age for the Health Insurance Plan clinical trial. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[53]  S. Shapiro,et al.  Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[54]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[55]  H P Chan,et al.  Combined adaptive enhancement and region-growing segmentation of breast masses on digitized mammograms. , 1999, Medical physics.

[56]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Discrete dynamic contour model for mass segmentation in digital mammograms , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[57]  C. Metz.  ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[58]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[59]  S. Duffy,et al.  The Gothenburg Breast Cancer Screening Trial: preliminary results on breast cancer mortality for women aged 39-49. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[60]  C A Roe,et al.  Statistical Comparison of Two ROC-curve Estimates Obtained from Partially-paired Datasets , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[61]  P. Chappuis,et al.  Re: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[62]  S. Orel,et al.  BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. , 1999, Radiology.

[63]  N. Petrick,et al.  Improvement of radiologists' characterization of mammographic masses by using computer-aided diagnosis: an ROC study. , 1999, Radiology.

[64]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening. , 2007, Radiology.

[65]  N. Karssemeijer,et al.  An automatic method to discriminate malignant masses from normal tissue in digital mammograms1 , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[66]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A discrete dynamic contour model , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[67]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial. , 2004, Radiology.

[68]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[69]  T. Donovan,et al.  Detection or decision errors? Missed lung cancer from the posteroanterior chest radiograph. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[70]  M. Giger,et al.  Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms. , 2002, Radiology.

[71]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  A comparison of methods for mammogram registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[72]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography , 2006, Medical Image Anal..

[73]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Use of prior mammograms in the classification of benign and malignant masses. , 2005, European journal of radiology.

[74]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Digital versus Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening , 2006 .

[75]  A. Miller,et al.  Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[76]  G. P. Cohen,et al.  Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. , 1997, Radiology.

[77]  K Berbaum,et al.  The Role of Previous Radiographs and Reports in the Interpretation of Current Radiographs , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[78]  Dragana Brzakovic,et al.  Establishing the correspondence between control points in pairs of mammographic images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[79]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Segmentation of breast tumors in mammograms by fuzzy region growing , 1998, Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Vol.20 Biomedical Engineering Towards the Year 2000 and Beyond (Cat. No.98CH36286).

[80]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[81]  J O Barentsz,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[82]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[83]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Comparison of similarity measures for the task of template matching of masses on serial mammograms. , 2005, Medical physics.

[84]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Effect of soft-copy display supported by CAD on mammography screening performance , 2005, European Radiology.

[85]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Use of border information in the classification of mammographic masses , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[86]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Optimized soft-copy display of digitized mammograms , 2003, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[87]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[88]  E A Sickles,et al.  Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. , 1986, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[89]  L. Tabár,et al.  REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHY Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare , 1985, The Lancet.

[90]  Josef Kittler,et al.  Floating search methods in feature selection , 1994, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[91]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Detection of breast asymmetry using anatomical features , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[92]  David Gur,et al.  Multi-image CAD employing features derived from ipsilateral mammographic views , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[93]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Finding corresponding regions of interest in mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal mammographic views. , 2006, Medical physics.

[94]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[95]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. , 2003, Radiology.

[96]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[97]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Temporal Change Analysis for Characterization of Mass Lesions in Mammography , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[98]  J W Sayre,et al.  Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. , 1999, Radiology.

[99]  L. Rutqvist,et al.  Followup after 11 years – update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial , 1997, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[100]  W. Hepburn,et al.  14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast-cancer screening , 1999, The Lancet.

[101]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images. , 1991, Medical physics.

[102]  L. Tabár,et al.  Efficacy of breast cancer screening by age. New results swedish two‐county trial , 1995, Cancer.

[103]  Jiri Matas,et al.  On Combining Classifiers , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[104]  Maryellen L. Giger,et al.  Automated seeded lesion segmentation on digital mammograms , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.