Quantification of costs for dispute resolution procedures in the construction industry

The extent to which disputes affect the construction industry has been well-documented. There are a plethora of anecdotal stories, and even some data that explain how unresolved conflict can impact project cost, schedule, and quality. In response, many systems and procedures have been developed to address disputes and their resolution within the construction industry. However, no data exist that quantitatively compare these various alternatives and the real costs of resolving a dispute using methods other than litigation. This paper presents a framework for identifying and capturing the transactional costs incurred to resolve disputes throughout the full spectrum of resolution options. Transactional cost data from 46 recently completed construction projects, totaling over $2 billion of total installed costs, confirm that these sums can account for a large portion of the settlement/award amount, the original claim amount, and even the total contract value when using some dispute resolution methods. Further...

[1]  Andrew J. Frano Guarding Against Litigation , 1996 .

[2]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Construction Claims and Disputes: Causes and Cost/Time Overruns , 1994 .

[3]  M. Kumaraswamy Conflicts, claims and disputes in construction , 1997 .

[4]  Kathleen M. J. Harmon,et al.  Resolution of Construction Disputes: A Review of Current Methodologies , 2003 .

[5]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  A multi-attribute utility model for dispute resolution strategy selection , 2002 .

[6]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  Project Dispute Resolution Satisfaction Classification through Neural Network , 2000 .

[7]  Graham Winch,et al.  Governing the project process: a conceptual framework , 2001 .

[8]  Darrick M. Mix ADR in the Construction Industry: Continuing the Development of a More Efficient Dispute Resolution Mechanism , 1997 .

[9]  Frederick D. Lazar,et al.  Project Partnering: Improving the Likelihood of Win/Win Outcomes , 2000 .

[10]  Liang Y Liu,et al.  ANALYTICAL MODEL FOR ANALYZING CONSTRUCTION CLAIMS AND OPPORTUNISTIC BIDDING , 2004 .

[11]  David Lowe,et al.  Conflict and dispute in construction , 1997 .

[12]  Richard L. Tucker,et al.  Partnered project performance in Texas Department of Transportation , 2000 .

[13]  Thomas B. Treacy USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 1995 .

[14]  Robert E. McCormick,et al.  ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES OF CONTRACTOR COMPENSATION , 1997 .

[15]  Jeffrey J. Kilian,et al.  Construction Litigation for the U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 1982–2002 , 2005 .

[16]  Francis T. Hartman,et al.  Contractors' Construction‐Claims Avoidance , 1994 .

[17]  James E. Diekmann,et al.  Are contract disputes predictable , 1995 .

[18]  J R Cheeks MULTISTEP DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY , 2003 .

[19]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Model for Understanding, Preventing, and Resolving Project Disputes , 2001 .

[20]  Khalid Siddiqi,et al.  Partnering: Tool for construction claims reduction , 2004 .

[21]  Tracy Y. Robar Communication and Career Advancement , 1998 .

[22]  O. Williamson Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations , 1979, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[23]  Thomas J. Stipanowich ADR and the 'Vanishing Trial': The Growth and Impact of 'Alternative Dispute Resolution' , 2004 .

[24]  Howard Schirmer Global Expansion: A Growing Dilemma , 1996 .

[25]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy CONSEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION CONFLICT: A HONG KONG PERSPECTIVE , 1998 .

[26]  James E. Diekmann,et al.  Construction Claims: Frequency and Severity , 1985 .