A Critical Test of Self‐Enhancement, Exposure, and Self‐Categorization Explanations for First‐ and Third‐Person Perceptions

The third-person perception is the tendency for people to believe that others are more influenced by media content than themselves (W. P. Davison, 1983). The current study provides a critical test of self-enhancement, exposure, and self-categorization explanations for first- (i.e., self more influenced than others) and third-person perceptions. Male and female participants (N = 323) judged the extent to which pornography elicited“aroused and excited” (i.e., male normative) versus“repulsed and offended” (i.e., female normative) reactions in themselves relative to average men and women. Men perceived an average woman to be more repulsed and offended by pornography than themselves, and women perceived an average man to be more aroused and excited than themselves (i.e., large third-person perceptions). Further, men perceived themselves to be more aroused and excited by pornography than an average woman (independent of the degree to which pornography was judged as antisocial), and women perceived themselves to be more repulsed and offended than an average man (i.e., large first-person perceptions). There were relatively small effects for same sex comparisons independent of norm. The pattern and magnitude of first- and third-person perceptions are consistent with self-categorization theory, irreconcilable with the exposure hypothesis, and difficult to reconcile with the self-enhancement explanation.

[1]  Cynthia A. Hoffner,et al.  The Third-Person effect in perceptions of the influence of television violence , 2001 .

[2]  W. Davison The Third-Person Effect in Communication , 1983 .

[3]  B. Hayes,et al.  Context‐dependent variation in social stereotyping 1: The effects of intergroup relations as mediated by social change and frame of reference , 1992 .

[4]  William P. Eveland,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY ON PERCEIVED MEDIA IMPACT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THIRD-PERSON PERCEPTIONS , 1999 .

[5]  D. Campbell Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities , 2007 .

[6]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Rethinking the Social Distance Corollary , 1999 .

[7]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Overrating the X‐Rating: The Third‐Person Perception and Support for Censorship of Pornography , 1995 .

[8]  Kurt Neuwirth,et al.  Extending the Framework of Third-, First-, and Second-Person Effects , 2002 .

[9]  H. Giles,et al.  Ageism across the lifespan : Towards a self-categorization model of ageing , 2005 .

[10]  Erica Scharrer,et al.  Third-Person Perception and Television Violence , 2002, Commun. Res..

[11]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  Biased Optimism and the Third-Person Effect , 1993 .

[12]  K. Cross Not can, but will college teaching be improved? , 1977 .

[13]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  The Perceived Influence of AIDS Advertising: Third-Person Effects in the Context of Positive Media Content , 1995 .

[14]  John C. Turner,et al.  Perceiving people as group members: The role of fit in the salience of social categorizations , 1991 .

[15]  Patrick C. Meirick Topic-Relevant Reference Groups and Dimensions of Distance , 2004, Commun. Res..

[16]  William P. Eveland,et al.  Support for Censorship of Violent and Misogynic Rap Lyrics , 1997 .

[17]  M. Hogg,et al.  Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms , 2006 .

[18]  D. Dunning,et al.  Ambiguity and self-evaluation: the role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability , 1989 .

[19]  Identity, Power, and Strategic Social Categorizations: Theorizing the Language of Leadership , 2003 .

[20]  Albert C. Gunther,et al.  What We Think Others Think , 1991 .

[21]  Prabu David,et al.  Methodological Artifact or Persistent Bias? , 2004, Commun. Res..

[22]  Ven-Hwei Lo,et al.  Third-Person Effect, Gender, and Pornography on the lnternet , 2002 .

[23]  Julie M. Duck,et al.  The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect , 1995 .

[24]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Perceived Persuasive Effects of Product Commercials and Public Service Announcements , 1992 .

[25]  J. Innes,et al.  The public's view of the impact of the mass media: A test of the ‘third person’ effect , 1988 .

[26]  C. Hoffner,et al.  Parents' Responses to Television Violence: The Third-Person Perception, Parental Mediation, and Support for Censorship , 2002 .

[27]  B. Paul,et al.  The Third-Person Effect: A Meta-Analysis of the Perceptual Hypothesis , 2000 .

[28]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Self‐Categorization Explanation for the Third‐Person Effect , 2005 .

[29]  M. Hogg,et al.  Uncertainty Reduction, Self-Enhancement, and Ingroup Identification , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Jeremy Cohen,et al.  Third-Person Effects and the Differential Impact in Negative Political Advertising , 1991 .

[31]  Dhavan V. Shah,et al.  FOR THE GOOD OF OTHERS: CENSORSHIP AND THE THIRD-PERSON EFFECT , 1996 .

[32]  Michael A. Hogg,et al.  A Social Identity Theory of Leadership , 2001 .