Always Best (dis-)Connected: Challenges to Interconnect Highly Heterogeneous Networks

Wireless networks enable mobility, multihoming, and Delay Tolerant Networks. In such networking environments, the principles of the Internet, i.e., the end-to-end principle and the combination of location and identification in IP addresses, cannot be applied. In this paper, we propose a scalable application centric approach for mobility and multihoming that is able to interconnect highly heterogeneous networks where the networks may belong to different networking paradigms, e.g., IP based and Delay Tolerant Networks. Applications and users that aim to communicate, form communities. Community members might together have several network technologies available, and the community layer manages internetworking information for the members to seamlessly integrate these. Networking adaptation layers are used to provide a common interface for the different networks to the community layer. Addressing is based on names, cryptographic identifiers, and network locators and such that identifiers can also be created in infrastructure-less and disconnected situations.

[1]  Marcelo Bagnulo,et al.  Shim6: Level 3 Multihoming Shim Protocol for IPv6 , 2009, RFC.

[2]  Giuseppe Di Battista,et al.  26 Computer Networks , 2004 .

[3]  M. Motani,et al.  Cross-layer design: a survey and the road ahead , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[4]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  Towards truly heterogeneous internets: Bridging infrastructure-based and infrastructure-less networks , 2011, 2011 Third International Conference on Communication Systems and Networks (COMSNETS 2011).

[5]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  Bundle Security Protocol Specification , 2011, RFC.

[6]  Joachim Sachs,et al.  Ambient networks: an architecture for communication networks beyond 3G , 2004, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[7]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised , 2010, RFC.

[8]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Floating content: Information sharing in urban areas , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).

[9]  Thierry Turletti,et al.  Message delivery in heterogeneous networks prone to episodic connectivity , 2011, Wirel. Networks.

[10]  Dino Farinacci,et al.  The Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP) , 2009, RFC.

[11]  George Varghese,et al.  Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications , 2001, SIGCOMM 2001.

[12]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[13]  Raj Jain,et al.  Architectures for the future networks and the next generation Internet: A survey , 2011, Comput. Commun..

[14]  Scott C. Burleigh,et al.  Bundle Protocol Specification , 2007, RFC.

[15]  Prithwish Basu,et al.  Intentional Naming in DTN , 2009 .

[16]  Pekka Nikander,et al.  Host Identity Protocol (HIP): Connectivity, Mobility, Multi-Homing, Security, and Privacy over IPv4 and IPv6 Networks , 2010, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[17]  Martin May,et al.  The autonomic network architecture (ANA) , 2010, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[18]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[19]  Kevin R. Fall,et al.  A delay-tolerant network architecture for challenged internets , 2003, SIGCOMM '03.

[20]  Andrew S. Tanenbaum,et al.  Computer networks (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[21]  Raj Jain,et al.  A Vision of the Next Generation Internet: A Policy Oriented Perspective , 2008, BCS Int. Acad. Conf..

[22]  Vinton G. Cerf,et al.  Delay-Tolerant Networking Architecture , 2007, RFC.

[23]  Wesley M. Eddy,et al.  A bundle of problems , 2009, 2009 IEEE Aerospace conference.

[24]  R. Bless,et al.  The Underlay Abstraction in the Spontaneous Virtual Networks (SpoVNet) Architecture , 2008, 2008 Next Generation Internet Networks.

[25]  Chetan Sharma,et al.  Always Best Connected , 2008 .