Strategies for resolving coherence breaks in reading

In two experiments, participants read passages containing an elaborate description of a main character that was either consistent, inconsistent, or neutral with respect to actions carried out by that character later in the text. The descriptions and subsequent target actions were separated by filler material that created a coherence break at either a local level or a global level. In Experiment 1, reading times for critical sentences containing the target actions were significantly longer when the early description and the critical sentences were inconsistent. This was true for both the local and global coherence conditions. In Experiment 2, resolution of global inconsistencies improved memory for the regions of the text that involved the inconsistencies, whereas resolution of local inconsistencies did not. The results are discussed in terms of the different strategies readers may use to resolve local and global coherence breaks.

[1]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .

[2]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[3]  John B. Black,et al.  Point of view in narrative comprehension, memory, and production , 1979 .

[4]  Charles R. Fletcher.  Short-term memory processes in text comprehension , 1981 .

[5]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[6]  P. Johnson-Laird.  Mental models , 1989 .

[7]  J. Keenan,et al.  The effects of causal cohesion on comprehension and memory , 1984 .

[8]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.

[9]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  When comprehension difficulty improves memory for text. , 1985 .

[10]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Causal relatedness and importance of story events , 1985 .

[11]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[12]  M. Just,et al.  The psychology of reading and language comprehension , 1986 .

[13]  Charles R. Fletcher,et al.  Strategies for the allocation of short-term memory during comprehension , 1986 .

[14]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension , 1987 .

[15]  S. Duffy,et al.  Degree of causal relatedness and memory , 1987 .

[16]  S. Garrod,et al.  Thematic subjecthood and cognitive constraints on discourse structure , 1988 .

[17]  C. Fletcher,et al.  Causal reasoning in the comprehension of simple narrative texts , 1988 .

[18]  S. Duffy,et al.  The effect of encoding task on memory for sentence pairs varying in causal relatedness , 1990 .

[19]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Comprehension strategies in the development of a mental model. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Inference during reading. , 1992 .

[21]  A. Glenberg,et al.  Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models☆ , 1992 .

[22]  Jason E. Albrecht,et al.  Updating a mental model: maintaining both local and global coherence , 1993 .

[23]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Maintaining global coherence during reading , 1994 .

[24]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. , 1994 .

[25]  T. Trabasso,et al.  Minimal or Global Inference during Reading , 1994 .