Cancellation, negation, and rejection

In this paper, new evidence is presented for the assumption that the reason-relation reading of indicative conditionals ('if A, then C') reflects a conventional implicature. In four experiments, it is investigated whether relevance effects found for the probability assessment of indicative conditionals (Skovgaard-Olsen, Singmann, & Klauer, 2016a) can be classified as being produced by (a) a conversational implicature, (b) a (probabilistic) presupposition failure, or (c) a conventional implicature. After considering several alternative hypotheses, and the accumulating evidence from other studies as well, we conclude that the evidence is most consistent with the Relevance Effect being the outcome of a conventional implicature. This finding indicates that the reason-relation reading is part of the semantic content of indicative conditionals, albeit not part of their primary truth-conditional content.

[1]  Igor Douven,et al.  Rethinking Gibbard’s Riverboat Argument , 2014, Stud Logica.

[2]  Dorothy Edgington,et al.  Matter-of-Fact Conditionals , 1991 .

[3]  David E. Over,et al.  Betting on conditionals , 2010 .

[4]  David E. Over,et al.  Paradigms, possibilities and probabilities: Comment on Hinterecker et al. (2016) , 2018 .

[5]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[6]  Robert Stalnaker,et al.  Presuppositions of Compound Sentences , 2008 .

[7]  Gillian Ramchand,et al.  Conventional implicatures , a distinguished class of meanings ∗ , 2005 .

[8]  M. Lyons.  Presupposition , 2021, Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  On the negation of indicative conditionals∗ , 2013 .

[11]  K. Fintel.  Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presuppositions and Truth-Value Intuitions) , 2001 .

[12]  O. Wilhelm,et al.  The meaning(s) of conditionals: conditional probabilities, mental models, and personal utilities. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  Geoffrey P. Goodwin,et al.  Logic, probability, and human reasoning , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Gerald Gazdar,et al.  Pragmatics: Implicature, Presupposition, and Logical Form , 1978 .

[15]  Mikael Olsson.  Conditionals , 2018, Modern C Quick Syntax Reference.

[16]  Todor Koev,et al.  Notions of at-issueness , 2018, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[17]  Seth Yalcin,et al.  Context Probabilism , 2011, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[18]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Facts and Possibilities: A Model-Based Theory of Sentential Reasoning , 2018, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Christopher Potts.  The logic of conventional implicatures , 2004 .

[20]  K. Bach.  The Myth of Conventional Implicature , 1999 .

[21]  Florence March,et al.  2016 , 2016, Affair of the Heart.

[22]  K. Krzyzanowska.  Between "If" and "Then.": towards an empirically informed philosophy of conditionals , 2015 .

[23]  Wolfgang Spohn,et al.  A Ranking-Theoretic Approach to Conditionals , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  The relevance effect and conditionals , 2016, Cognition.

[25]  Richard Vallée,et al.  Conventional implicature revisited , 2008 .

[26]  Renaat Declerck,et al.  Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[27]  Igor Douven,et al.  The Epistemology of Indicative Conditionals: Formal and Empirical Approaches , 2015 .

[28]  David E Over,et al.  Conditionals and conditional probability. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  D. Over,et al.  The Psychology of Uncertainty and Three-Valued Truth Tables , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[30]  K. Fintel.  What is Presupposition Accommodation, Again? , 2008 .

[31]  Bart Geurts,et al.  Scalar Diversity , 2016, J. Semant..

[32]  Eve Sweetser,et al.  Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions , 2005 .

[33]  Robert Stalnaker.  A Theory of Conditionals , 2019, Knowledge and Conditionals.

[34]  Igor Douven.  How to account for the oddness of missing-link conditionals , 2015, Synthese.

[35]  M. Biezma.  The grammar of discourse: The case of then , 2014 .

[36]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Negation: A theory of its meaning, representation, and use , 2012 .

[37]  G. Kleiter,et al.  How people interpret conditionals: shifts toward the conditional event. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  M. Kölbel.  Edgington on Compounds of Conditionals , 2000 .

[39]  N. Chater,et al.  Précis of Bayesian Rationality: The Probabilistic Approach to Human Reasoning , 2009, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  Ulf-Dietrich Reips.  Standards for Internet-based experimenting. , 2002, Experimental psychology.

[41]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial , 2019, Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science.

[43]  David Barner,et al.  Ignorance and Inference: Do Problems with Gricean Epistemic Reasoning Explain Children's Difficulty with Scalar Implicature? , 2014, J. Semant..

[44]  P. Strawson.  III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .

[45]  Thomas Hinterecker,et al.  Modality, probability, and mental models. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  D. Edgington.  General conditional statements: a response to Kölbel , 2000 .

[47]  David E. Over,et al.  New paradigm psychology of reasoning , 2009 .

[48]  Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al.  A Priori True and False Conditionals. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[49]  D. Over,et al.  Studies in the Way of Words. , 1989 .

[50]  John K. Kruschke,et al.  Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan , 2014 .

[51]  J. Bennett.  A Philosophical Guide to Conditionals , 2003 .

[52]  S. Moss.  On the semantics and pragmatics of epistemic vocabulary , 2015 .

[53]  François Recanati,et al.  Truth-Conditional Pragmatics , 2011 .

[54]  R. Carston.  Conjunction, explanation and relevance , 1993 .

[55]  Christopher Potts.  Presupposition and Implicature , 2015 .

[56]  H. Savin,et al.  The projection problem for presuppositions , 1971 .

[57]  R. Byrne,et al.  It is not the case that if you understand a conditional you know how to negate it , 2012 .

[58]  Judith Tonhauser,et al.  Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content , 2011 .

[59]  E. W. Adams,et al.  The logic of conditionals , 1975 .

[60]  Gennaro Chierchia,et al.  Meaning and grammar , 1990 .

[61]  R. Carston.  Thoughts and Utterances , 2002 .

[62]  Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Presuppositions, provisos, and probability , 2012 .

[63]  Ulrike Hahn,et al.  The Puzzle of Conditionals with True Clauses: Against the Gricean Account , 2017, CogSci.

[64]  I. Douven,et al.  The Adams family , 2010, Cognition.

[65]  N. Olsen.  Making Ranking Theory useful for Psychology of Reasoning , 2014 .

[66]  Philip N Johnson-Laird,et al.  The modulation of conditional assertions and its effects on reasoning , 2010 .

[67]  A. Böhmer,et al.  Macrolides and community-acquired pneumonia: is quorum sensing the key? , 2010, Critical care.

[68]  Niki Pfeifer,et al.  A process model of the understanding of uncertain conditionals , 2018 .

[69]  David Kellen,et al.  Relevance differently affects the truth, acceptability, and probability evaluations of “and”, “but”, “therefore”, and “if–then” , 2017 .

[70]  Henrik Singmann,et al.  Relevance and Reason Relations. , 2017, Cognitive science.

[71]  S. Sloman,et al.  The probability of causal conditionals , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[72]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Conditionals: A Theory of Meaning, Pragmatics, and Inference , 2002 .

[73]  Michael Blome-Tillmann,et al.  Conversational Implicatures (and How to Spot Them) , 2013 .

[74]  The negated conditional: a litmus test for the suppositional conditional? , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[75]  Siobhan Chapman.  Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[76]  W. Salmon.  Conventional implicature, presupposition, and the meaning of must , 2011 .

[77]  Raydonal Ospina,et al.  A general class of zero-or-one inflated beta regression models , 2011, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[78]  David E. Over,et al.  Probabilistic accounts of conditional reasoning , 2017 .

[79]  U. Hahn,et al.  Between a conditional’s antecedent and its consequent: Discourse coherence vs. probabilistic relevance , 2017, Cognition.

[80]  Betty J. Birner.  Introduction to Pragmatics , 2012 .

[81]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Everything That Linguists Have Always Wanted to Know About Logic , 1980, Stud Logica.

[82]  Igor Douven,et al.  The New Paradigm and Mental Models , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[83]  F. Ramsey.  General Propositions and Causality , 1931 .

[84]  B. Russell.  II.—On Denoting , 1905 .

[85]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan , 2017 .

[86]  J. Gawron.  Implicature , 2019, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Human Communication Sciences and Disorders.

[87]  Todor Koev,et al.  Experimental Evidence for the Truth Conditional Contribution and Shifting Information Status of Appositives , 2015, J. Semant..