Identifying Situational Clustering and Quantifying Its Magnitude in Dominant Case Configurations: New Methods for Conjunctive Analysis

Steps for conducting Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations (CACC) are well documented in the literature; however, methods for identifying and quantifying “situational clustering” vary and are often based on subjective interpretation of a CACC truth table. In response, the current article presents two new techniques that (a) enable researchers to determine whether data used to populate a truth table cluster significantly within dominant case configurations and (b) apply an established metric from the economics literature and modified for configural analysis to quantify its relative magnitude. These new methods are applied to four existing CACC studies, demonstrating how they offer a more systematic, transparent, and replicable approach to analyzing and interpreting case configurations than what is currently used.

[1]  Walter S. DeKeseredy,et al.  Context Matters: Violence Against Women and Reporting to Police in Rural, Suburban and Urban Areas , 2013 .

[2]  Heng Xiao,et al.  A New Representation Theorem for Elastic Constitutive Equations of Cubic Crystals , 1998 .

[3]  Michael Kenneth Townsley,et al.  Preventing maritime pirate attacks: a conjunctive analysis of the effectiveness of ship protection measures recommended by the international maritime organisation , 2014 .

[4]  Jaclyn M. Cwick,et al.  Unpacking the Complexity of Life Events and Desistance: An Application of Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations to Developmental and Life Course Criminology , 2016, Journal of developmental and life-course criminology.

[5]  Lynn A. Addington,et al.  Rape Against Adolescent and Emerging Adult Females , 2015 .

[6]  H. Dalton The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes , 1920 .

[7]  Graham Bell,et al.  A Comparative Method , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Rethinking Homicide: Exploring the Structure and Process Underlying Deadly Situations , 2004 .

[9]  T. Mieczkowski,et al.  Lethal Outcome in Sexual Assault Events: A Conjunctive Analysis , 2010 .

[10]  Eric Beauregard,et al.  Choice of weapon or weapon of choice? Examining the interactions between victim characteristics in single-victim male sexual homicide offenders , 2016 .

[11]  Walter S. DeKeseredy,et al.  Situational Contexts of Rural Violence: A Comparison of Male and Female Perpetration , 2017 .

[12]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Exploring the Social Context of Instrumental and Expressive Homicides: An Application of Qualitative Comparative Analysis , 1999 .

[13]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Contextualizing sentencing disparities: using conjunctive analysis of case configurations to identify patterns of variability , 2014 .

[14]  Peter J. Diggle,et al.  Simple Monte Carlo Tests for Spatial Pattern , 1977 .

[15]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Situational Context of Student Bullying Victimization and Reporting Behavior: A Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations , 2013 .

[16]  Routine Activity Theory and the Likelihood of Arrest: A Replication and Extension With Conjunctive Methods , 2017 .

[17]  Jeremy D. Barnum,et al.  Crime in Context: Utilizing Risk Terrain Modeling and Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations to Explore the Dynamics of Criminogenic Behavior Settings , 2017 .

[18]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Carjacking and its consequences: A situational analysis of risk factors for differential outcomes , 2010 .

[19]  T. Hart,et al.  First Nations Peoples and Judicial Sentencing: Main Effects and the Impact of Contextual Variability , 2015 .

[21]  Timothy C. Hart,et al.  Street robbery and public bus stops: A case study of activity nodes and situational risk , 2014 .

[22]  M. O. Lorenz,et al.  Methods of Measuring the Concentration of Wealth , 1905, Publications of the American Statistical Association.

[23]  J. Walkup Fuzzy-set social science , 2003 .

[24]  Terance D. Miethe,et al.  Exploring Bystander Presence and Intervention in Nonfatal Violent Victimization: When Does Helping Really Help? , 2008, Violence and Victims.

[25]  Timothy C. Hart,et al.  The Conjunctive Analysis of Case Configurations: An Exploratory Method for Discrete Multivariate Analyses of Crime Data , 2008 .

[26]  Wouter Steenbeek,et al.  More Places than Crimes: Implications for Evaluating the Law of Crime Concentration at Place , 2017 .

[27]  Timothy C. Hart,et al.  Configural Behavior Settings of Crime Event Locations , 2015 .

[28]  Jeff Gruenewald,et al.  Suspicious preoperational activities and law enforcement interdiction of terrorist plots , 2019, Policing: An International Journal.

[29]  Are Similar Sex Offenders Treated Similarly? A Conjunctive Analysis of Disparities in Community Notification Decisions , 2011 .

[30]  Lucia Summers,et al.  Spatial conjunctive analysis of (crime) case configurations: Using Monte Carlo methods for significance testing , 2017 .

[31]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy set theory , 1992 .