On the Specific Role of the Occipital Cortex in Scene Perception

In recent years there has been mounting scientific excitement about the perception of scenes containing more realistic and complex stimuli than simple objects or drawings. Visual recognition of scenes is a fast, automatic and reliable process. Experimental studies have shown that complex natural scenes can be categorized in a very short time (under 150 ms [1]), suggesting a simple and efficient coding process. Many studies have attested to the importance of the Fourier components of images in scene categorization. In terms of signal representation, an image can be expressed in the Fourier domain as amplitude and phase spectra [2-5]. The amplitude spectrum highlights the dominant spatial scales (spatial frequencies) and the dominant orientations of the image, while the phase spectrum describes the relationship between spatial frequencies. It is now well established that the primary visual cortex is mainly dominated by complex cells which respond preferentially to orientations and spatial frequencies [6-8]. Simulation and psychophysical experiments have shown that information from low/medium frequencies of the amplitude spectrum is sufficient to enable scene categorization [9, 10]. These data support current influential models of scene perception [11-14].

[1]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[2]  Muriel Boucart,et al.  Does context or color improve object recognition in patients with low vision? , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[3]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A physiological correlate of the 'spotlight' of visual attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Johannes R. Vingerling,et al.  The prevalence of age-related maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study. , 1995, Ophthalmology.

[6]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. III. Color , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Scott O. Murray,et al.  Hemispheric Asymmetry in Global/Local Processing: Effects of Stimulus Position and Spatial Frequency , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  D R Badcock,et al.  Low-Frequency Filtering and the Processing of Local—Global Stimuli , 1990, Perception.

[10]  J. Sergent,et al.  Role of task factors in visual field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  G. McKitterick,et al.  THE MAGNITUDE OF π , 1983 .

[13]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[14]  L. Robertson,et al.  The effect of visual angle on global and local reaction times depends on the set of visual angles presented , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Antonio Torralba,et al.  Statistics of natural image categories , 2003, Network.

[17]  C. Curcio,et al.  Topography of ganglion cells in human retina , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  Benita J. O’Colmain,et al.  Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  R. L. Valois,et al.  The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex , 1982, Vision Research.

[20]  E. Midena,et al.  Macular function impairment in eyes with early age-related macular degeneration. , 1997, Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science.

[21]  D. Pollen,et al.  Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurones in visual cortical areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. , 1985, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  R C Kleiner,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[23]  G. R Mangun,et al.  On the processing of spatial frequencies as revealed by evoked-potential source modeling , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  M. Boucart,et al.  Scene perception in age-related macular degeneration. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[26]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of human inferior temporal cortex during coarse-to-fine and fine-to-coarse analysis of natural visual scenes , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  E. Souied,et al.  [Epidemiology of age related macular degeneration]. , 2009, Journal Francais d'Ophtalmologie.

[28]  M. Gillies,et al.  Immunological and Aetiological Aspects of Macular Degeneration , 2001, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[29]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Recognition of facial emotion in low vision: A flexible usage of facial features , 2008, Visual Neuroscience.

[30]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[31]  A. T. Smith,et al.  Spatiotemporal Frequency and Direction Sensitivities of Human Visual Areas Measured Using fMRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[32]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Amplitude spectra of natural images. , 1992, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[33]  K Zilles,et al.  A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of local/global processing with stimulus presentation in the peripheral visual hemifields , 2004, Neuroscience.

[34]  G. Holmes DISTURBANCES OF VISION BY CEREBRAL LESIONS , 1918, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[35]  Xiangmin Xu,et al.  How do functional maps in primary visual cortex vary with eccentricity? , 2007, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  G L Shulman,et al.  The Role of Spatial-Frequency Channels in the Perception of Local and Global Structure , 1986, Perception.

[37]  Monica Baciu,et al.  Hemispheric predominance assessment of phonology and semantics: A divided visual field experiment , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[38]  B S Hawkins,et al.  Epidemiology of age-related macular degeneration. , 1999, Molecular vision.

[39]  N. Guyader,et al.  Residual abilities in age-related macular degeneration to process spatial frequencies during natural scene categorization , 2011, Visual Neuroscience.

[40]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Image phase or amplitude? Rapid scene categorization is an amplitude-based process. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[41]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  Neural Activity in Early Visual Areas During Global and Local Processing: A Reply to Fink, Marshall, Halligan, and Dolan , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  N. Guyader,et al.  Figure ground discrimination in age-related macular degeneration. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[43]  R Näsänen,et al.  Training-induced cortical representation of a hemianopic hemifield , 2006, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[44]  S. Miyauchi,et al.  Attention-regulated activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  M. Stryker,et al.  Spatial Frequency Maps in Cat Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  M. Bar,et al.  Cortical Mechanisms Specific to Explicit Visual Object Recognition , 2001, Neuron.

[47]  J. Bullier Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[48]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Spatial filtering and visual form perception. , 1986 .

[49]  J Sergent,et al.  Role of the input in visual hemispheric asymmetries. , 1983, Psychological bulletin.

[50]  J. Faubert,et al.  Binocular Vision in Older People with Adventitious Visual Impairment: Sometimes One Eye Is Better than Two , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[51]  M. Bar A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Sylvie Chokron,et al.  Selective attention, inhibition for repeated events and hemispheric specialization , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[53]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  D. Navon Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.

[55]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[56]  Pia Rotshtein,et al.  Distinct and Convergent Visual Processing of High and Low Spatial Frequency Information in Faces , 2007 .

[57]  P. Jong Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in the United States. , 2004 .

[58]  RussLL L. Ds Vnlos,et al.  SPATIAL FREQUENCY SELECTIVITY OF CELLS IN MACAQUE VISUAL CORTEX , 2022 .

[59]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[60]  E. Switkes,et al.  Functional anatomy of macaque striate cortex. V. Spatial frequency , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[61]  J. Sergent The cerebral balance of power: confrontation or cooperation? , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  Richard B Buxton,et al.  Putting spatial attention on the map: timing and localization of stimulus selection processes in striate and extrastriate visual areas , 2001, Vision Research.

[63]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  An Invitation to cognitive science , 1997 .

[64]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[65]  D. Voyer,et al.  On the magnitude of laterality effects and sex differences in functional lateralities. , 1996, Laterality.

[66]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[67]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Functional properties of neurons in macaque area V3. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[68]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  J. Hegdé Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[70]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  M. Buchsbaum,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry for selective attention. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[72]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[73]  B W Knight,et al.  Representation of spatial frequency and orientation in the visual cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[75]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The order of visual processing: “Top-down,” “bottom-up,” or “middle-out” , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[76]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[77]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  Philip W. Anderson,et al.  From the top down , 1996, Nature.

[79]  Tetsuya Iidaka,et al.  Spatial frequency of visual image modulates neural responses in the temporo-occipital lobe. An investigation with event-related fMRI. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[80]  M G Woldorff,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries for different components of global/local attention occur in distinct temporo-parietal loci. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[81]  S Marrett,et al.  Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[82]  Carole Peyrin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for spatial frequency processing in the analysis of natural scenes , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[83]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries , 1986, Brain and Cognition.

[84]  Maryanne Martin,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for local and global processing , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[85]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Hemispneric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI , 1997, Neuroreport.

[86]  J. Mcglone,et al.  Sex differences in cerebral processing of visuospatial tasks. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[87]  Monica Baciu,et al.  Cerebral regions and hemispheric specialization for processing spatial frequencies during natural scene recognition. An event-related fMRI study , 2004, NeuroImage.

[88]  Gereon R. Fink,et al.  Neuronal Activity in Early Visual Areas during Global and Local Processing: A Comment on Heinze, Hinrichs, Scholz, Burchert, and Mangun , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[89]  G. Mangun,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Global and Local Processing: A Combined PET and ERP Study , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[90]  Stephen Christman,et al.  Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[91]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Effect of temporal constraints on hemispheric asymmetries during spatial frequency processing , 2006, Brain and Cognition.

[92]  Shingo Yamagata,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[93]  J R Lishman,et al.  Role of coarse and fine spatial information in face and object processing. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[94]  G. Poggio,et al.  Spatial properties of neurons in striate cortex of unanesthetized macaque monkey. , 1972, Investigative ophthalmology.

[95]  Cheuk Y. Tang,et al.  Thalamocortical circuits: fMRI assessment of the pulvinar and medial dorsal nucleus in normal volunteers , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[96]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[97]  R. Dolan,et al.  Switching between the Forest and the Trees: Brain Systems Involved in Local/Global Changed-Level Judgments , 2001, NeuroImage.

[98]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Neural correlates of spatial frequency processing: A neuropsychological approach , 2006, Brain Research.

[99]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[100]  A. Oliva,et al.  Flexible, Diagnosticity-Driven, Rather Than Fixed, Perceptually Determined Scale Selection in Scene and Face Recognition , 1997, Perception.

[101]  F. Kitterle,et al.  Visual field effects in the discrimination of sine-wave gratings , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[102]  E W Yund,et al.  The role of spatial frequency in the processing of hierarchically organized stimuli , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[103]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual Object Recognition , 1996, ISTCS.

[104]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. , 1995 .

[105]  Poggio Gf Spatial properties of neurons in striate cortex of unanesthetized macaque monkey. , 1972 .

[106]  P Girard,et al.  Feedback connections act on the early part of the responses in monkey visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[107]  A. Dale,et al.  The Retinotopy of Visual Spatial Attention , 1998, Neuron.

[108]  J Sergent,et al.  Theoretical and methodological consequences of variations in exposure duration in visual laterality studies , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[109]  Stephen E. Palmer,et al.  Modern Theories of Gestalt Perception , 1990 .

[110]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.