Perceptions, User Satisfaction and Success: Testing the DeLone and McLean Model in the User Developed Application Domain

DeLong and McLean's (1992) model of information systems success has received much attention among researchers. This study applies an adaptation of the full DeLone and McLean model, for the first time, in the user developer domain. Of the nine hypotheses derived from the model, four were found to be significant and the reminder not significant. There was strong support for the proposed relationships between perceived system quality and user satisfaction, perceived information quality and user satisfaction, user satisfaction and intended use, and user satisfaction and perceived individual impact. This study indicates that user perceptions of information systems success play a significant role in the user developed application domain. There was, however, no relationship between user developer's perceptions of system quality and independent experts' evaluations, and user ratings of individual impact were not associated with organizational impact measured as company performance in a business simulation. Further research is required to understand the relationship between user perceptions of information systems success and objective measures of success, and to provide a model of information systems success appropriate to end user development.

[1]  N. Melone A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[2]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[3]  B. Elango,et al.  The Effect of Attitudes, Goal Setting and Self-Efficacy on End User Performance , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[4]  Jon Hartwick,et al.  The Impact of Automated Office Systems on Middle Managers and Their Work , 1987, MIS Q..

[5]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Keen An Empirical Evaluation of User Information Satisfaction (UIS) Measures for Use with General Ledger Accounting Software I. Introduction , 2002 .

[7]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[8]  Jane Klobas,et al.  Adults Learning To Use the Internet: A Longitudinal Study of Attitudes and Other Factors Associated with Intended Internet Use , 2000 .

[9]  Paul H. Cheney,et al.  Organizational Factors Affecting the Success of End-User Computing , 1986, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Margi Levy,et al.  Developing a 3-D model of information systems success , 1998 .

[11]  Henri Barki,et al.  Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude , 1994, MIS Q..

[12]  John H. Murphy,et al.  Are Students Real People , 1974 .

[13]  Seija Ridell,et al.  ICTs and the communicative conditions for democracy: a local experiment with web-mediated civic publicness , 2004 .

[14]  Mehdi Khosrow-Pour,et al.  Printed at: , 2011 .

[15]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  Beyond information quality: fitness for purpose and electronic information resource use , 1995, J. Inf. Sci..

[16]  Barbara D. Klein,et al.  User evaluations of IS as surrogates for objective performance , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Lori N. K. Leonard,et al.  Citation classics from the information systems literature , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[18]  William R. King,et al.  Determinants of the effectiveness of personal decision support systems , 1986, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Mark John Taylor,et al.  End‐user computing and information systems methodologies , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[20]  Margaret Tan,et al.  The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Exploring the measurement of end user computing success , 1999 .

[22]  Amy W. Gatian Is user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectiveness? , 1994, Inf. Manag..

[23]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  A Partial Test and Development of Delone and Mclean's Model of IS Success , 1996, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Graduate business students as surrogates for executives in the evaluation of technology , 1996 .

[25]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[27]  Malcolm King,et al.  Spreadsheet Modelling Abuse: An Opportunity for OR? , 1993 .

[28]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[29]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  A Snapshot of MIS Researcher Agendas , 1996 .

[30]  Kwasi Amoako-Gyampah,et al.  User involvement and user satisfaction: An exploratory contingency model , 1993, Inf. Manag..

[31]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Information Systems Effectiveness: A User Satisfaction Approach , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  M. Gordon,et al.  The “Science of the Sophomore” Revisited: from Conjecture to Empiricism , 1986 .

[33]  Donald L. Amoroso,et al.  Quality end user-developed applications: some essential ingredients , 1992, DATB.

[34]  George M. Kasper,et al.  A laboratory study of user characteristics and decision-making performance in end-user computing , 1985, Inf. Manag..

[35]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[36]  P. Robinson,et al.  Entrepreneurial Research on Student Subjects Does Not Generalize to Real World Entrepreneurs , 1991 .

[37]  Tanya McGill,et al.  User satisfaction as a measure of success in end user application development: An empirical investigation , 1998 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  Graham C. Low,et al.  Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[40]  Jane E. Klobas,et al.  A planned behavior in context model of networked information resource use , 1999, HCI.

[41]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[42]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[43]  Gina Green,et al.  Gender Differences in Perceptions and Use of Communication Technologies: A Diffusion of Innovation Approach , 2005, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[44]  M. L. Gibson,et al.  Students as Surrogates for Managers in a Decision-Making Environment: An Experimental Study , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..