Culpable control and the psychology of blame.

A culpable control model is advanced to describe the conditions that encourage as well as mitigate blame and to assess the process by which blame and mitigation occur. The fundamental assumptions of the model are that evidence concerning harmful events is scrutinized for its contribution to personal control and spontaneously evaluated for its favorableness or unfavorableness. Spontaneous evaluations encourage a blame-validation mode of processing in which evidence concerning the event is reviewed in a manner that favors ascribing blame to the person or persons who evoke the most negative affect or whose behavior confirms unfavorable expectations. The author delineates the elements of perceived control and then discusses spontaneous evaluation influences on control and blame assessments. The blame-validation process is described next. Finally, the culpable control model is compared with extant theories of blame and responsibility and its basic tenets summarized.

[1]  J. Piaget.  The Moral Judgment of the Child , 1932 .

[2]  R. Collingwood.  An essay on metaphysics , 1940 .

[3]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[4]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[5]  A. Honoré,et al.  Causation in the law , 1960 .

[6]  M. Lerner.  EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE AS A FUNCTION OF PERFORMER'S REWARD AND ATTRACTIVENESS. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  E. Walster,et al.  Assignment of responsibility for an accident. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  M. Lerner,et al.  Observer's reaction to the "innocent victim": compassion or rejection? , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Bernard Berofsky.  Free will and determinism , 1966 .

[10]  C. Simmons,et al.  OBSERVER'S REACTION TO THE "INNOCENT VICTIM": , 1966 .

[11]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .

[12]  M. Lerner,et al.  Reactions to suffering of others under conditions of indirect responsibility. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Harry Kalven,et al.  The American Jury , 1967 .

[14]  M. Lerner,et al.  Altruism as a search for justice. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  H. Hart.  Punishment and responsibility , 1969 .

[16]  E. Aronson,et al.  The influence of the character of the criminal and his victim on the decisions of simulated jurors , 1969 .

[17]  J. Altrocchi,et al.  Attribution of intent. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  David Hume.  A Treatise of Human Nature: Being an Attempt to introduce the experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects , 1972 .

[19]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  Defensive attribution-Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident , 1970 .

[20]  F. L. Bailey,et al.  Successful techniques for criminal trials , 1971 .

[21]  John Austin,et al.  A plea for excuses , 1971 .

[22]  C. Nemeth,et al.  A simulated jury study: Characteristics of the defendant and the jurors. , 1973 .

[23]  R. H. Sosis,et al.  Internal-external control and the perception of responsibility of another for an accident. , 1974 .

[24]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Juror judgment as information integration: Combining evidential and nonevidential information. , 1974 .

[25]  Joel Feinberg,et al.  Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility , 1974 .

[26]  M. G. Efran,et al.  The effect of physical appearance on the judgment of guilt, interpersonal attraction, and severity of recommended punishment in a simulated jury task. , 1974 .

[27]  N. Vidmar,et al.  Authoritarianism and Recall of Evidence about Criminal Behavior. , 1975 .

[28]  Harold Sigall,et al.  Beautiful but dangerous: Effects of offender attractiveness and nature of the crime on juridic judgment. , 1975 .

[29]  P. Brickman,et al.  Causal chains: Attribution of responsibility as a function of immediate and prior causes. , 1975 .

[30]  J. G. Holmes,et al.  Deserving and the Emergence of Forms of Justice1 , 1976 .

[31]  James R. Scroggs.  Penalties for Rape as a Function of Victim Provocativeness, Damage, and Resistance , 1976 .

[32]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  An information-processing approach to attribution of responsibility ☆ , 1977 .

[33]  Harry T. Reis,et al.  Justice needs a new blindfold: A review of mock jury research. , 1977 .

[34]  L. Ross,et al.  The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes , 1977 .

[35]  N. Kerr.  Severity of prescribed penalty and mock jurors' verdicts. , 1978 .

[36]  B. Sales,et al.  The art and science of conducting the voir dire. , 1978 .

[37]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. , 1978 .

[38]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[39]  Torts : cases and materials , 1978 .

[40]  E. E. Jones,et al.  The rocky road from acts to dispositions. , 1979, The American psychologist.

[41]  B. R. Schlenker.  Impression Management: The Self-Concept, Social Identity, and Interpersonal Relations , 1980 .

[42]  Frank D. Fincham,et al.  Attribution of Responsibility: From Man the Scientist to Man As Lawyer , 1980 .

[43]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Belief in a Just World , 1980 .

[44]  M. R. Leippe,et al.  Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidence , 1980 .

[45]  K. A. Clarke,et al.  Understanding predictive relations of necessity and sufficiency in formally equivalent "causal" and "logical" problems , 1980 .

[46]  Attribution of responsibility to a victim of rape , 1981 .

[47]  M. Lerner,et al.  The Justice motive in social behavior : adapting to times of scarcity and change , 1981 .

[48]  J. Burger.  Motivational biases in the attribution of responsibility for an accident: A meta-analysis of the defensive-attribution hypothesis. , 1981 .

[49]  T. Shultz,et al.  Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of harm-doing. , 1981 .

[50]  Thomas R. Shultz,et al.  Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harm , 1981 .

[51]  B. Sales.  The trial process , 1981 .

[52]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Relative importance of prior and immediate events: A causal primacy effect. , 1982 .

[53]  B. R. Schlenker.  Translating Actions into Attitudes: An Identity-Analytic Approach to the Explanation of Social Conduct1 , 1982 .

[54]  Harry G. Frankfurt,et al.  The importance of what we care about: Freedom of the will and the concept of a person , 1971 .

[55]  Jennifer Campbell,et al.  Alcohol and Rape , 1982 .

[56]  Rules of evidence for the United States Courts and magistrates : practice comments , 1982 .

[57]  Frank D. Fincham,et al.  Attribution Theory and Research: Conceptual, Developmental and Social Dimensions , 1983 .

[58]  J. Karuza,et al.  Relative preference and adaptiveness of behavioral blame for observers of rape victims. , 1984, Journal of personality.

[59]  F. Fincham,et al.  Intervening causation and the mitigation of responsibility for harm doing II. The role of limited mental capacities , 1985 .

[60]  C. Muehlenhard,et al.  Is Date Rape Justifiable?: The Effects of Dating Activity, Who Initiated, Who Paid, and Men's Attitudes toward Women , 1985 .

[61]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Excuses: Masquerades in Search of Grace , 1985 .

[62]  T. Shultz,et al.  Judging the intentionality of action-outcomes. , 1985 .

[63]  Kelly G. Shaver,et al.  The attribution of blame : causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness , 1985 .

[64]  Yaacov Schul,et al.  When discounting fails: Conditions under which individuals use discredited information in making a judgment. , 1985 .

[65]  Roselle L. Wissler,et al.  On the inefficacy of limiting instructions , 1985 .

[66]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Judging probable cause. , 1986 .

[67]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives , 1986 .

[68]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[69]  N. Pennington,et al.  Evidence evaluation in complex decision making. , 1986 .

[70]  R. Fazio,et al.  On the automatic activation of attitudes. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[71]  Irving B. Weiner,et al.  Handbook of forensic psychology. , 2005 .

[72]  E. E. Jones.  Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior , 1987 .

[73]  Conditions for assigning blame: the impact of necessity and sufficiency. , 1987, The British journal of social psychology.

[74]  H. Kelley.  Attribution in social interaction. , 1987 .

[75]  Assessing the competence of juries. , 1987 .

[76]  Norman Miller,et al.  Ten years of research on the false-consensus effect: an empirical and theoretical review , 1987 .

[77]  F. Fincham,et al.  Implicit theories of criminal responsibility , 1987 .

[78]  M. Brewer.  A dual process model of impression formation. , 1988 .

[79]  J. Baron,et al.  Outcome bias in decision evaluation. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Excuses: their effective role in the negotiation of reality. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[81]  Limited mental capacities and perceived control in attribution of responsibility. , 1988, The British journal of social psychology.

[82]  J. Darley,et al.  Attribution of Responsibility for Accidents: A Negligence Law Analogy , 1988 .

[83]  Joel T. Johnson,et al.  Causal Primacy and Comparative Fault , 1989 .

[84]  R. Fazio.  On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. , 1989 .

[85]  G. Wells,et al.  Mental Simulation of Causality , 1989 .

[86]  M. Alicke,et al.  The role of a posteriori victim information in judgments of blame and sanction , 1989 .

[87]  Patricia G. Devine,et al.  Automatic and controlled processes in prejudice: The role of stereotypes and personal beliefs. , 1989 .

[88]  J. Bargh.  Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. , 1989 .

[89]  M. Weigold,et al.  Inferring Intentions and Responsibility from Motives and Outcomes: Evidential and Extra-Evidential Judgments , 1990 .

[90]  T. Shultz,et al.  Moral Rules: Their Content and Acquisition , 1990 .

[91]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  Attitude structure and function , 1990 .

[92]  Capacity Responsibility in Social Evaluation , 1990 .

[93]  P. White.  Ideas About Causation in Philosophy and Psychology , 1990 .

[94]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: implications for blame assignment , 1990 .

[95]  S. Kassin,et al.  Blood and Guts: General and Trial-Specific Effects of Videotaped Crime Scenes on Mock Jurors , 1991 .

[96]  L. Schneider,et al.  The Role of Sexual Provocativeness, Rape History, and Observer Gender in Perceptions of Blame in Sexual Assault , 1991 .

[97]  S. Golding,et al.  The social construction of criminal responsibility and insanity , 1991 .

[98]  Charles Stangor,et al.  Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. , 1992 .

[99]  N. Pennington,et al.  Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. , 1992 .

[100]  Tracy Bostwick,et al.  Effects of gender and specific dating behaviors on perceptions of sex willingness and date rape , 1992 .

[101]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[102]  G. Bodenhausen.  Emotions, Arousal, and Stereotypic Judgments: A Heuristic Model of Affect and Stereotyping , 1993 .

[103]  Diane M. Mackie,et al.  Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception. , 1993 .

[104]  B. R. Schlenker,et al.  The triangle model of responsibility. , 1994, Psychological review.

[105]  M. Alicke,et al.  A Posteriori adjustment of a priori decision criteria. , 1994 .

[106]  B. Weiner.  Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct , 1995 .

[107]  D. Gilbert,et al.  The correspondence bias. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[108]  M. Alicke,et al.  Perpetrator Personality and Judgments of Acquaintance Rape , 1995 .

[109]  P. Skolnick,et al.  When is defendant status a shield or a liability? Clarification and extension , 1996 .

[110]  Julie H. Goldberg,et al.  Sober Second Thought: The Effects of Accountability, Anger, and Authoritarianism on Attributions of Responsibility , 1998 .

[111]  A. L. McGill.  Relative use of necessity and sufficiency information in causal judgments about natural categories , 1998 .

[112]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[113]  H. Zeisel,et al.  The American Jury , 1966 .