A Taxonomy-Based Usability Study of an Intelligent Speed Adaptation Device

Usability studies are often based on ad hoc definitions of usability. These studies can be difficult to generalize, they might have a steep learning curve, and there is always the danger of being inconsistent with the concept of usability as defined in standards and the literature. This alternative approach involves comprehensive, general-purpose, and hierarchically structured taxonomies that follow closely the main usability literature. These taxonomies are then instantiated for a specific product. To illustrate this approach, a usability study for a prototype of an Intelligent Speed Adaptation device is described. The usability study consists of usability requirements analysis, heuristic evaluation, and subjective analysis, which helped identify problems of clarity, operability, robustness, safety, and aesthetics. As a context-specific usability taxonomy for this particular field of application happened to exist, the way that real-world usability results can be mapped to that taxonomy compared to the taxonomy in this article is examined, with the argument that this study’s taxonomy is more complete and generalizable.

[1]  Oscar Mauricio Serrano Jaimes,et al.  EVALUACION DE LA USABILIDAD EN SITIOS WEB, BASADA EN EL ESTANDAR ISO 9241-11 (International Standard (1998) Ergonomic requirements For office work with visual display terminals (VDTs)-Parts II: Guidance on usability , 2012 .

[2]  G. Maycock,et al.  SPEED, SPEED LIMITS AND ACCIDENTS , 1994 .

[3]  Steven Broekx,et al.  POTENTIAL NETWORK EFFECTS OF INTELLIGENT SPEED ADAPTATION , 2004 .

[4]  Kyle R. Lynch,et al.  Development of a Weighted Heuristic for Website Evaluation for Older Adults , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Myung Hwan Yun,et al.  Evaluation of product usability: development and validation of usability dimensions and design elements based on empirical models , 2000 .

[6]  Omer Tsimhoni,et al.  Common Automotive Navigation System Usability Problems and a Standard Test Protocol to Identify Them , 2003 .

[7]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Context of use as a factor in determining the usability of in-vehicle devices , 2011 .

[8]  Niels Agerholm,et al.  Intelligent speed adaptation based on pay as you drive principles , 2007 .

[9]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model , 2006, Software Quality Journal.

[10]  Guoqiang Hu,et al.  A Methodology for Structured Use-Centered Quantitative Full-Life-Cycle Usability Requirements Specification and Usability Evaluation of Web Sites , 2006, International Conference on Internet Computing.

[11]  Ebba Þóra Hvannberg,et al.  Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems , 2007, Interact. Comput..

[12]  Sue Conger,et al.  Software Development Life Cycles and Methodologies: Fixing the Old and Adopting the New , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Syst. Approach.

[13]  Vicente Moret-Bonillo,et al.  Usability: A Critical Analysis and a Taxonomy , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  Luiz Fernando Capretz,et al.  Users’ perception of open source usability: an empirical study , 2011, Engineering with Computers.

[15]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES FOR ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS: LITERATURE REVIEW , 1996 .

[16]  G E Burnett.  USABLE VEHICLE NAVIGATION SYSTEMS : ARE WE THERE YET? , 2000 .

[17]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  In-Vehicle Information Systems to Meet the Needs of Drivers , 2011, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Sidney L. Smith,et al.  Guidelines for Designing User Interface Software , 1986 .

[19]  A Stevens,et al.  DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR SAFETY OF IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 2002 .

[20]  T A Dingus,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES FOR ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ATIS) AND COMMERCIAL VEHICLE OPERATIONS (CVO): HUMAN FACTORS EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTI-MODALITY DISPLAYS IN ADVANCED TRAVELER INFORMATION SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[21]  David Alonso Ríos.  Development of usability and context-of-use taxonomies, integration with techniques for the study of usability and application to real-world intelligent systems , 2015 .

[22]  Jonathan Earthy,et al.  The Benefits of Using ISO 13407: Human Centred Design Process for Interactive Systems , 2001, INTERACT.

[23]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Finding usability problems through heuristic evaluation , 1992, CHI.

[24]  Frank Lai,et al.  ISA UK - Intelligent Speed Adaptation - final report , 2008 .

[25]  Giancarlo Guizzardi,et al.  Ontological evaluation of the ITU-T Recommendation G.805 , 2011, 2011 18th International Conference on Telecommunications.

[26]  David Paine,et al.  In-vehicle intelligent speed advisory systems , 2007 .

[27]  Alain Abran,et al.  Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards , 2003, Software Quality Journal.

[28]  W. Buxton.  Human-Computer Interaction , 1988, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[29]  Leonard Adelman,et al.  Handbook for Evaluating Knowledge-Based Systems , 1997, Springer US.

[30]  Kristie Lee Young,et al.  EVALUATING IN-VEHICLE INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS: A CASE STUDY , 2002 .

[31]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability engineering , 1997, The Computer Science and Engineering Handbook.

[32]  Soohyung Joo,et al.  Measuring the usability of academic digital libraries: Instrument development and validation , 2011, Electron. Libr..

[33]  Frank Lai,et al.  ISA-UK: intelligent speed adaptation , 2008 .

[34]  A J McLean,et al.  Vehicle travel speeds and the incidence of fatal pedestrian crashes. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  Nsw Roads and Maritime Services.  Intelligent Speed Adaptation , 2010 .

[36]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  Representing part-whole relations in conceptual modeling: an empirical evaluation , 2008 .

[37]  David G. Novick,et al.  Usability inspection methods after 15 years of research and practice , 2007, SIGDOC '07.

[38]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Damaged Merchandise? A Review of Experiments That Compare Usability Evaluation Methods , 1998, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[39]  Benjamin Keevil,et al.  Measuring the usability index of your Web site , 1998, SIGDOC '98.

[40]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Chapter 4 – The Usability Engineering Lifecycle , 1993 .

[41]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic evaluation of user interfaces , 1990, CHI '90.

[42]  Raul Sanchez-Reillo,et al.  Evaluation methodology for analyzing usability factors in biometrics , 2010 .

[43]  Vicente Moret-Bonillo,et al.  A Context-of-Use Taxonomy for Usability Studies , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[44]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[45]  J Martin.  AFTER A 4 YEAR TRIAL ; WHAT THE SWEDES THINK OF ISA , 2002 .

[46]  Shuang Xu,et al.  A Study of the Feasibility and Effectiveness of Dual-Modal Information Presentations , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[48]  Pekka Jäppinen,et al.  Usability study of ME2.0 , 2011, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[49]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars , 1993, Inf. Syst. J..

[50]  Raul Sanchez-Reillo,et al.  Evaluation methodology for analyzing usability factors in biometrics , 2009, 43rd Annual 2009 International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.