Measuring the Change Towards More Sustainable Mobility: MUV Impact Evaluation Approach

Urban areas can be considered the ground for the challenges related to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The objective of shaping cities as human settlement that will see a more inclusive, safe, resilient, and sustainable future is often argued in literature as an issue dependent on behavioral change of inhabitants in urban areas. In this paper, the authors question if experimental applications based on gamification can co-produce more sustainable neighborhoods through an impact evaluation method that departs from individual choices within the complex of urban mobility. This investigation is carried out within MUV (Mobility Urban Values), an EU research and innovation project, which aims to trigger more sustainable urban mobility in six pilot cities. This article describes the critical method of validation, an impact assessment of the MUV experimental gamification in the pilot cities, in order to represent a proof for future urban strategies. This methodological approach is based on an evaluation structured on indicators of both impact and process suitable for urban contexts. As based on six pilot cities, with possibilities for transferability to other contexts and scalability to other cities, the method represents a reference work for the evaluation of similar experimental applications.

[1]  Un Desa Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[2]  K. Groos The Play of Man , 1901, Nature.

[3]  Lynne Stuart,et al.  TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development A/RES/70/1: THEME: statement, ‘Do not leave Indigenous Australians behind’ , 2017 .

[4]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[5]  J. Innes,et al.  Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century , 2004 .

[6]  Bernard Suits,et al.  The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia , 1978 .

[7]  R. Joumard,et al.  Framework for Assessing Indicators of Environmental Impacts in the Transport Sector , 2011 .

[8]  Stephen Wendel,et al.  Designing for Behavior Change: Applying Psychology and Behavioral Economics , 2013 .

[9]  G. Rizzo,et al.  Design, technology and social innovation: the serious game of traffic O2 , 2019 .

[10]  Y. Strengers,et al.  Introduction : Social practices, intervention and sustainability: beyond behaviour change , 2015 .

[11]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Does Gamification Work? -- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies on Gamification , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  Andrea Vesco,et al.  MUV: A Game to Encourage Sustainable Mobility Habits , 2018, GALA.

[13]  Aapo Huovila,et al.  What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities , 2017 .

[14]  M. Requier-Desjardins,et al.  The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2015, An Insider's Guide to the UN.

[15]  Urban Innovation Through Co-design Scenarios , 2018 .

[16]  M. Washburn,et al.  The Play of Man. , 1902 .

[17]  Ezio Manzini,et al.  Making Things Happen: Social Innovation and Design , 2014, Design Issues.

[18]  P. Bosch,et al.  CITYkeys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities , 2017 .

[19]  Gürhan Durak,et al.  A Systematic Review of Gamification Research: In Pursuit of Homo Ludens , 2018, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[20]  Nicole Fruehauf Flow The Psychology Of Optimal Experience , 2016 .

[21]  Ann-Carita Evaldsson Play and games , 2009 .

[22]  O. Devisch,et al.  Participatory Design Theory , 2018 .

[23]  John Nalbandian Public Participation for 21st Century Democracy , 2017 .

[24]  M. N. Saunders,et al.  The origins and conceptualizations of ‘triple-loop’ learning: A critical review , 2012 .

[25]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.