Holistic methodological framework for the characterization of urban sustainability and strategic planning

Abstract In the past decades several attempts were made for the ad-hoc application of systems of indicators as decision-support tools towards sustainable urban development. The selected systems’ results are often questioned, either for the suitability of the selected system per se, or for its ability to characterize effectively urban sustainability. In the attempt to satisfy the demanding needs of indicators’ systems, the primar reason for which such tools were introduced is often neglected and we enter into an endless, time consuming process of arithmetic calculations, forgetting about the need to link results to strategies and applicable measures. Citizens’ perception and social maturity to accept decisions, as well as the multiplying effect of decisions to the environment, applicability and funding availability, are criteria that need to be considered, before the uptake of decisions. The current study introduces an ‘‘Indicator System for Characterization of Urban Sustainability’’ (ICARUS). ICARUS is a system for the elaboration of sustainability profile of a city. It addresses the Euro-Mediterranean urban contexts that from an eco-systemic approach point of view interact in a unique way with sustainability pillars. It is designed for aiding the delivery of the sustainability agenda as well. The methodological framework leads to a prioritized list of sustainability measures that takes into consideration not only stand-alone data but also citizens’ perception and assessment against other important criteria. The methodology is applied for the case of Municipality of Thessaloniki, in Greece. Proximity to basic services, green element and space for pedestrians are the most highly hierarchized measures.

[1]  Tomás B. Ramos,et al.  Meta-performance evaluation of sustainability indicators , 2010 .

[2]  Nicolas Moussiopoulos,et al.  A multiple criteria decision-making approach to put forward tree species in urban environment , 2014 .

[3]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Decision-aid for discrete multiple criteria decision making problems with imprecise data , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Lucien Yves Maystre,et al.  Méthodes multicritères ELECTRE : description, conseils pratiques et cas d'application à la gestion environnementale , 1994 .

[5]  M. Ziyaee Assessment of urban identity through a matrix of cultural landscapes , 2017 .

[6]  Christos Vlachokostas,et al.  Environmental, social and economic information management for the evaluation of sustainability in urban areas: A system of indicators for Thessaloniki, Greece , 2010 .

[7]  N. Moussiopoulos,et al.  Preservation of the Mediterranean Identity: An Intra-City Analysis Towards a Macro-Regional Approach for the Characterisation of Urban Sustainability , 2018, Sustainability.

[8]  M. Vizzari,et al.  Landscape liveability spatial assessment integrating ecosystem and urban services with their perceived importance by stakeholders , 2017 .

[9]  Yuh-Ming Lee,et al.  Urban sustainability assessment of Taiwan based on data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[10]  Giuseppe Munda,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis and Sustainable Development , 2005 .

[11]  Bernard Roy,et al.  Ranking of suburban line extension projects on the Paris metro system by a multicriteria method , 1982 .

[12]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  C. Achillas,et al.  Prioritize strategies to confront environmental deterioration in urban areas: Multicriteria assessment of public opinion and experts’ views , 2011 .

[14]  Bernard Roy,et al.  A programming method for determining which Paris metro stations should be renovated , 1986 .

[15]  L. Perini,et al.  Long-Term Urban Growth and Land Use Efficiency in Southern Europe: Implications for Sustainable Land Management , 2015 .

[16]  Fjalar J. de Haan,et al.  The needs of society: A new understanding of transitions, sustainability and liveability , 2014 .

[17]  P. Coelho,et al.  The role of common local indicators in regional sustainability assessment , 2010 .

[18]  Mark Reed,et al.  An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities , 2006 .

[19]  Konstantinos Moustakas,et al.  An integrated approach for the management of demolition waste in Cyprus , 2008, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[20]  N. Moussiopoulos,et al.  Involving decision-makers in the transformation of results into urban sustainability policies , 2016 .

[21]  Nicolas Moussiopoulos,et al.  Characterisation of sustainability in urban areas: An analysis of assessment tools with emphasis on European cities , 2018, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[22]  Heracles Polatidis,et al.  Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework , 2003 .

[23]  Luís Miguel Nunes,et al.  Selection of sustainability indicators for planning: combining stakeholders' participation and data reduction techniques , 2015 .

[24]  Martin Rogers,et al.  Choosing realistic values of indifference, preference and veto thresholds for use with environmental criteria within ELECTRE , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  C. Siriopoulos,et al.  Trade asymmetries in the Mediterranean basin , 2018, The Journal of Economic Asymmetries.

[26]  L. Ntziachristos,et al.  Decision support system for the evaluation of urban air pollution control options: application for particulate pollution in Thessaloniki, Greece. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[27]  X. Zhang,et al.  The trends, promises and challenges of urbanisation in the world , 2016 .

[28]  N Moussiopoulos,et al.  Air quality status in Greater Thessaloniki Area and the emission reductions needed for attaining the EU air quality legislation. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[30]  N. Munier,et al.  Methodology to select a set of urban sustainability indicators to measure the state of the city, and performance assessment , 2011 .

[31]  M. Mourshed,et al.  Urban sustainability assessment framework development: The ranking and weighting of sustainability indicators using analytic hierarchy process , 2019, Sustainable Cities and Society.

[32]  Jose Manuel Cabello,et al.  Multicriteria development of synthetic indicators of the environmental profile of the Spanish regions , 2014 .

[33]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods , 2008 .

[34]  M. G. Pérez,et al.  URBIUS : a method for assessing the sustainability of urban renewal strategies at neighborhood scale , 2015 .