Using causal models in heterogeneous information fusion to detect terrorists

We describe basic research that uses a causal, uncertainty-sensitive computational model rooted in qualitative social science to fuse disparate pieces of threat information. It is a cognitive model going beyond rational-actor methods. Having such a model has proven useful when information is uncertain, fragmentary, indirect, soft, conflicting, and even deceptive. Inferences from fusion must then account for uncertainties about the model, the credibility of information, and the fusion methods - i.e. we must consider both structural and parametric uncertainties, including uncertainties about the uncertainties. We use a novel combination of (1) probabilistic and parametric methods, (2) alternative models and model structures, and (3) alternative fusion methods that include nonlinear algebraic combination, variants of Bayesian inference, and a new entropy-maximizing approach. Initial results are encouraging and suggest that such an analytically flexible and model-based approach to fusion can simultaneously enrich thinking, enhance threat detection, and reduce harmful false alarms.

[1]  Douglas Yeung,et al.  Using Behavioral Indicators to Detect Potential Violent Acts , 2013 .

[2]  Christopher Paul,et al.  Social Science for Counterterrorism: Putting the Pieces Together , 2009 .

[3]  R. Selten,et al.  Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox , 2000 .

[4]  Cosma Rohilla Shalizi,et al.  Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. , 2010, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[5]  F. Al-Shamali,et al.  Author Biographies. , 2015, Journal of social work in disability & rehabilitation.

[6]  Rocco J. Perla,et al.  Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes , 2007 .

[7]  D. Seddon A `New Paradigm' for Analysis? , 1986 .

[8]  J. Mingers,et al.  A New Paradigm of Analysis , 2001 .

[9]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[10]  Florentin Smarandache,et al.  Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion , 2004 .

[11]  Jean Dezert,et al.  An introduction to DSmT , 2009, ArXiv.

[12]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Primer for building factor trees to represent social-science knowledge , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[13]  D. Kahneman MAPS OF BOUNDED RATIONALITY: A PERSPECTIVE ON INTUITIVE JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 2003 .

[14]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Implications of Modern Decision Science for Military Decision-Support Systems , 2005 .

[15]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Lessons from RAND's Work on Planning Under Uncertainty for National Security , 2012 .

[16]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 1: Alternative Perspectives , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[17]  Gary Klein,et al.  Making Sense of Sensemaking 2: A Macrocognitive Model , 2006, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[18]  David G. Groves,et al.  A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[20]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Understanding and Influencing Public Support for Insurgency and Terrorism , 2012 .

[21]  Angela O'Mahony,et al.  A Computational Model of Public Support for Insurgency and Terrorism: A Prototype for More-General Social-Science Modeling , 2013 .

[22]  Florentin Smarandache,et al.  Advances and Applications of DSmT for Information Fusion (Collected Works) , 2004 .

[23]  Paul K. Davis,et al.  Using Behavioral Indicators to Help Detect Potential Violent Acts: A Review of the Science Base , 2013 .

[24]  John Hollywood,et al.  Building on Clues: Examining Successes and Failures in Detecting U.S. Terrorist Plots, , 2010 .

[25]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .