Exploring Innovation in Policy-making within Central Government

The first and main contribution of this article is its access to the decision-making processes which drive innovation in policy-making within central government. The article will present a detailed case history of how the innovation came about and conclude by highlighting analytic possibilities for future research. The policy in focus is the UK’s Traffic Management Act 2004, which passed responsibility for managing incidents on major roads from the police to the Highways Agency (HA), and has been interpreted as a world first in traffic management. The article tracks the Traffic Management Act 2004 from problem identification to a preliminary evaluation. It is then suggested that future research could explain organizational change more theoretically. By taking a longitudinal and multi-level approach, the research falls into a processual account of organizational change. The second contribution of the article is to highlight two novel ways in which this approach is being applied to policy-making, through an institutional processualist research programme on public management reform and empirical investigations using complex systems to explain policy change.

[1]  P. Allen,et al.  Understanding Policy Implementation Processes as Self-Organizing Systems , 2008 .

[2]  James Baldwin,et al.  Complexity and the limits to learning , 2007 .

[3]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  From “New Institutionalism” to “Institutional Processualism”: Advancing Knowledge about Public Management Policy Change , 2006 .

[4]  C. Chew Positioning and its strategic relevance , 2006 .

[5]  P. John,et al.  Is There Life After Policy Streams, Advocacy Coalitions, and Punctuations: Using Evolutionary Theory to Explain Policy Change? , 2003 .

[6]  Neil F. Johnson,et al.  The science of complexity , 2002 .

[7]  Michael J.R. Butler,et al.  Local Government Modernization: UK and Comparative Analysis from an Organizational Perspective , 2002 .

[8]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  What Is Complexity Science? Knowledge of the Limits to Knowledge , 2001 .

[9]  Keith Dowding,et al.  How Not to Use Evolutionary Theory in Politics: A Critique of Peter John , 2000 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew WHAT IS A PROCESSUAL ANALYSIS. , 1997 .

[11]  D. Sutherland,et al.  On the road. , 1996, Nursing times.

[12]  A. Pettigrew Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice , 1990 .

[13]  R. H. Waterman,et al.  In Search of Excellence , 1983 .

[14]  Anthony Giddens,et al.  Studies in social and political theory , 1979 .

[15]  A. Giddens,et al.  New Rules of Sociological Method: A Positive Critique of Interpretative Sociologies. , 1977 .

[16]  A. Strauss,et al.  Excerpts from : The Discovery of Grounded Theory : Strategies for Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[17]  Eric D. Beinhocker The Origin of Wealth - Evolution, Complexity, and the Radical Remaking of Economics , 2007 .

[18]  Celine Chew,et al.  What factors influence positioning strategies in voluntary non-profit organisations? Towards a conceptual framework , 2003 .

[19]  M. Mintrom,et al.  Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation , 1997 .

[20]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The New Public Management in Action , 1996 .

[21]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Longitudinal Field Research on Change , 1995 .