Single-subject analysis reveals variation in knee mechanics during step landing.

PURPOSE Evidence concerning the alteration of knee function during landing suffers from a lack of consensus. This uncertainty can be attributed to methodological flaws, particularly in relation to the statistical analysis of variable human movement data. The aim of this study was to compare single-subject and group analyses in detecting changes in knee stiffness and coordination during step landing that occur independent of an experimental intervention. METHODS A group of healthy men (N=12) stepped-down from a knee-high platform for 60 consecutive trials, each trial separated by a 1-minute rest. The magnitude and within-participant variability of sagittal stiffness and coordination of the landing knee were evaluated with both group and single-subject analyses. RESULTS The group analysis detected significant changes in knee coordination. However, the single-subject analyses detected changes in all dependent variables, which included increases in variability with task repetition. Between-individual variation was also present in the timing, size and direction of alterations. CONCLUSION The results have important implications for the interpretation of existing information regarding the adaptation of knee mechanics to interventions such as fatigue, footwear or landing height. It is proposed that a participant's natural variation in knee mechanics should be analysed prior to an intervention in future experiments.

[1]  B T Bates,et al.  Single-subject methodology: an alternative approach. , 1996, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Denis Marchand,et al.  Perceived safety and biomechanical stress to the lower limbs when stepping down from fire fighting vehicles. , 2005, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  B. Thompson,et al.  How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes , 2004 .

[4]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  P. Komi,et al.  Interaction between pre-landing activities and stiffness regulation of the knee joint musculoskeletal system in the drop jump: implications to performance , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[6]  C. Lovejoy.  The natural history of human gait and posture. Part 3. The knee. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[7]  Nicholas Stergiou,et al.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament recontruction on lower extremity relative phase dynamics during walking and running , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[8]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Antonio Pedotti,et al.  Motor strategies in landing from a jump: the role of skill in task execution , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  B. Boden,et al.  Mechanisms of anterior cruciate ligament injury. , 2000, Orthopedics.

[11]  Michael L Madigan,et al.  Changes in landing biomechanics during a fatiguing landing activity. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[12]  H. Preuschoft.  Mechanisms for the acquisition of habitual bipedality: are there biomechanical reasons for the acquisition of upright bipedal posture? , 2004, Journal of anatomy.

[13]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Dynamics of human gait , 1992 .

[14]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  Identifying the control structure of multijoint coordination during pistol shooting , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  S. Dye,et al.  The knee as a biologic transmission with an envelope of function: a theory. , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[16]  Keith Davids,et al.  Coordination changes in a discrete multi-articular action as a function of practice. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[17]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Baseline measures are altered in biomechanical studies. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  N. Stergiou,et al.  Interactive effects between group and single-subject response patterns , 1995 .

[19]  Joseph Hamill,et al.  Gender differences in lower extremity coupling variability during an unanticipated cutting maneuver. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[20]  P. Leva.  Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. , 1996 .

[21]  Jill S Higginson,et al.  Foot clearance during stair descent: effects of age and illumination. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[22]  Frank Mayer,et al.  Stiffness adaptations in shod running. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[23]  P. Komi,et al.  Acute and prolonged reduction in joint stiffness in humans after exhausting stretch-shortening cycle exercise , 2002, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[24]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[25]  W. Herzog,et al.  The role of muscles in joint adaptation and degeneration , 2003, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[26]  B T Bates,et al.  Contributions of lower extremity joints to energy dissipation during landings. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[27]  Nicholas Stergiou,et al.  Effect of normalization and phase angle calculations on continuous relative phase. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  J R Steele,et al.  Is lower limb muscle synchrony during landing affected by gender? Implications for variations in ACL injury rates. , 2001, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[29]  F.,et al.  The Knee as a Biologic Transmission With an Envelope of Function , 2005 .

[30]  B T Bates,et al.  Effects of injury proneness and task difficulty on joint kinetic variability. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.