A recurrent network involving the transcription factors PU.1 and Gfi1 orchestrates innate and adaptive immune cell fates.

The transcription factor PU.1, encoded by the Sfpi1 gene, functions in a graded manner to regulate macrophage versus B cell generation; its higher concentration favors the macrophage fate. We demonstrated that Gfi1 reciprocally promoted B cell fate choice at the expense of myeloid progeny. Gfi1(-/-) multipotential progenitors (MPPs) were unable to constrain the expression of PU.1 because Gfi1 functioned to repress the Sfpi1 gene by displacing PU.1 from positive autoregulatory elements. Attenuating a transcriptional module composed of PU.1 and Egr suppressed the B lineage developmental defects of Gfi1(-/-) MPPs. Finally Ikaros, a transcription factor required for B cell development, promoted Gfi1 and antagonized PU.1 expression in MPPs. Our results reveal that a core transcriptional regulatory network used for directing cell fate choice in the innate immune system has been co-opted by Ikaros to orchestrate B lymphocyte generation. These findings have important implications for the evolution of the adaptive immune system.

[1]  Pu Zhang,et al.  Potential Autoregulation of Transcription Factor PU.1 by an Upstream Regulatory Element , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[2]  T. Graf,et al.  Determinants of lymphoid-myeloid lineage diversification. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[3]  P. Lásló,et al.  Multilineage Transcriptional Priming and Determination of Alternate Hematopoietic Cell Fates , 2006, Cell.

[4]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Contingent gene regulatory networks and B cell fate specification. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Richard Dahl,et al.  Regulation of macrophage and neutrophil cell fates by the PU.1:C/EBPα ratio and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor , 2003, Nature Immunology.

[6]  A. Sharpe,et al.  Selective defects in the development of the fetal and adult lymphoid system in mice with an Ikaros null mutation. , 1996, Immunity.

[7]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Gene regulatory networks directing myeloid and lymphoid cell fates within the immune system. , 2008, Seminars in immunology.

[8]  Ignacio A. Demarco,et al.  Regulation of B cell fate commitment and immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangements by Ikaros , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[9]  Hui Zeng,et al.  Transcription factor Gfi1 regulates self‐renewal and engraftment of hematopoietic stem cells , 2004, The EMBO journal.

[10]  E. Bertolino,et al.  Transcription factor EBF restricts alternative lineage options and promotes B cell fate commitment independently of Pax5 , 2008, Nature Immunology.

[11]  S. Ng,et al.  Early hematopoietic lineage restrictions directed by Ikaros , 2006, Nature Immunology.

[12]  C. Murre,et al.  E protein function in lymphocyte development. , 2002, Annual review of immunology.

[13]  J. Kutok,et al.  Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1 , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[14]  T. Möröy,et al.  Gfi1:Green Fluorescent Protein Knock-in Mutant Reveals Differential Expression and Autoregulation of the Growth Factor Independence 1 (Gfi1) Gene during Lymphocyte Development* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[15]  Jiangwen Zhang,et al.  Genome-wide lineage-specific transcriptional networks underscore Ikaros-dependent lymphoid priming in hematopoietic stem cells. , 2009, Immunity.

[16]  John O. Trent,et al.  Mutations in growth factor independent-1 associated with human neutropenia block murine granulopoiesis through colony stimulating factor-1. , 2008, Immunity.

[17]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Assembling a gene regulatory network for specification of the B cell fate. , 2004, Developmental cell.

[18]  C. Murre,et al.  Regulation of the helix-loop-helix proteins, E2A and Id3, by the Ras-ERK MAPK cascade , 2001, Nature Immunology.

[19]  Ellen V Rothenberg,et al.  Molecular genetics of T cell development. , 2005, Annual review of immunology.

[20]  E. Scott,et al.  Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. , 1994, Science.

[21]  P. Swiatek,et al.  Perinatal lethality and defects in hindbrain development in mice homozygous for a targeted mutation of the zinc finger gene Krox20. , 1993, Genes & development.

[22]  Lina A. Thoren,et al.  Identification of Flt3+ Lympho-Myeloid Stem Cells Lacking Erythro-Megakaryocytic Potential A Revised Road Map for Adult Blood Lineage Commitment , 2005, Cell.

[23]  T. Möröy,et al.  The Transcriptional Repressor Gfi1 Affects Development of Early, Uncommitted c-Kit+ T Cell Progenitors and CD4/CD8 Lineage Decision in the Thymus , 2003, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  J. Rowley,et al.  Knockdown of Pu.1 by small interfering RNA in CD34+ embryoid body cells derived from mouse ES cells turns cell fate determination to pro-B cells. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Ellen V Rothenberg,et al.  Constitutive expression of PU.1 in fetal hematopoietic progenitors blocks T cell development at the pro-T cell stage. , 2002, Immunity.

[26]  T. Graf,et al.  Reprogramming of committed T cell progenitors to macrophages and dendritic cells by C/EBP alpha and PU.1 transcription factors. , 2006, Immunity.

[27]  H. Singh,et al.  Regulation of B lymphocyte and macrophage development by graded expression of PU.1. , 2000, Science.

[28]  Rochelle A. Diamond,et al.  Notch/Delta signaling constrains reengineering of pro-T cells by PU.1 , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  J. Milbrandt,et al.  Thymocyte Development in Early Growth Response Gene 1-Deficient Mice1 , 2002, The Journal of Immunology.

[30]  J. Walsh,et al.  PU.1 regulates both cytokine‐dependent proliferation and differentiation of granulocyte/macrophage progenitors , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[31]  P. Charnay,et al.  Conditional, floxed allele of the Krox20 gene , 2002, Genesis.

[32]  R. Månsson,et al.  E2A proteins promote development of lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors. , 2008, Immunity.

[33]  Nicola K. Wilson,et al.  A Two-Step, PU.1-Dependent Mechanism for Developmentally Regulated Chromatin Remodeling and Transcription of the c-fms Gene , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  Hui Zeng,et al.  Inflammatory reactions and severe neutropenia in mice lacking the transcriptional repressor Gfi1 , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[35]  M. Simon,et al.  The Transcriptional Repressor GFI-1 Antagonizes PU.1 Activity through Protein-Protein Interaction* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  A. Feeney,et al.  Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[37]  Harinder Singh,et al.  Gene targeting reveals a hierarchy of transcription factors regulating specification of lymphoid cell fates. , 1996, Current opinion in immunology.

[38]  John Anastasi,et al.  Cooperative and antagonistic interplay between PU.1 and GATA-2 in the specification of myeloid cell fates. , 2002, Immunity.

[39]  H. Singh,et al.  PU.1, a shared transcriptional regulator of lymphoid and myeloid cell fates. , 1999, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[40]  Donald Metcalf,et al.  Dynamic regulation of PU.1 expression in multipotent hematopoietic progenitors , 2005, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[41]  Scott Cameron,et al.  Intrinsic requirement for zinc finger transcription factor Gfi-1 in neutrophil differentiation. , 2003, Immunity.

[42]  Achim Leutz,et al.  Lymphoid cell growth and transformation are suppressed by a key regulatory element of the gene encoding PU.1 , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[43]  Hyun-Jun Lee,et al.  PU.1 regulates expression of the interleukin-7 receptor in lymphoid progenitors. , 2002, Immunity.

[44]  S. Orkin,et al.  Gfi-1 restricts proliferation and preserves functional integrity of haematopoietic stem cells , 2004, Nature.

[45]  F. Camargo,et al.  Regulation of lymphoid versus myeloid fate 'choice' by the transcription factor Mef2c , 2009, Nature Immunology.