Unleashed enthusiasm: ethical reflections on harms, benefits, and animal-centered aims of ACI

This paper offers an interdisciplinary approach to ethical questions concerning animal welfare in Animal Computer Interaction (ACI), combining concepts from animal ethics and the empirical foundations of ethology and animal welfare science. First, we reflect on the self-proclaimed ethical positions of ACI, its responsibilities toward human and nonhuman animals, and potential conflicts in practical application. We then explore the central aims of ACI to improve welfare, benefit animals, and improve the human-animal relationship. There are exciting potentials for animals to benefit from ACI; nevertheless, there are some methodological problems given the non-speciesist aspirations of ACI. There is a need for a greater focus on data collection, attention to long-term implications of ACI technology use, assessment of animal time budgets, and careful interpretation of preference tests. Finally, we briefly discuss the opportunity for critical anthropomorphism to strengthen the methodology of ACI.

[1]  Jolina H. Ruckert,et al.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE The Human Relation With Nature and Technological Nature , 2022 .

[2]  Márta Gácsi,et al.  Behavioral assessment and owner perceptions of behaviors associated with guilt in dogs , 2012 .

[3]  Kirsten Schmidt,et al.  Concepts of Animal Welfare in Relation to Positions in Animal Ethics , 2011, Acta biotheoretica.

[4]  Karen L. Overall,et al.  The mismeasure of behavior: Identifying tests meaningful to the species studied , 2015 .

[5]  Nicholas H. Dodman,et al.  Animal Models of Obsessive-Compulsive Behavior: A Neurobiological and Ethological Perspective , 2005 .

[6]  Heli Väätäjä,et al.  Ethical issues and guidelines when conducting HCI studies with animals , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  G. Tami,et al.  Description of the behaviour of domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by experienced and inexperienced people , 2009 .

[8]  Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge,et al.  Entertainment Computing - ICEC 2015 , 2015, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[9]  M. Sjöström,et al.  International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity Physical Activity, Overweight and Central Adiposity in Swedish Children and Adolescents: the European Youth Heart Study , 2022 .

[10]  Heli Väätäjä,et al.  Animal Welfare as a Design Goal in Technology Mediated Human-Animal Interaction , 2014, ACE '14 Workshops.

[11]  Maarten H. Lamers,et al.  Interactive Digital Gameplay Can Lower Stress Hormone Levels in Home Alone Dogs - A Case for Animal Welfare Informatics , 2015, ICEC.

[12]  Heli Väätäjä,et al.  Please, Don't Drive Me Nuts! Experience Goals for Dogs , 2012 .

[13]  G. Arbanas.  Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) , 2015 .

[14]  Tom Feltwell,et al.  Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs , 2015, CHI.

[15]  Matthias Rauterberg,et al.  Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2007 , 2007, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[16]  Janet C. Read,et al.  Who Is Really In The Center Of Dog Computer Design? , 2014, ACE '14 Workshops.

[17]  G. Burghardt.  Animal suffering, critical anthropomorphism, and reproductive rights , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  NorthSteve.  Do Androids dream of electric steeds , 2016 .

[19]  Donald M. Broom,et al.  Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment , 1996 .

[20]  Margie Scherk,et al.  From Problem to Success , 2012, Journal of feline medicine and surgery.

[21]  Evgeny V. Morozov,et al.  To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems that Don't Exist by E. Morozov, ed., , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[22]  Randolph G. Bias,et al.  Research Methods for Human-Computer Interaction , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Robert E. McGrath,et al.  Species-appropriate computer mediated interaction , 2009, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[24]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership , 2006 .

[25]  D. Arney,et al.  42 What is Animal Welfare and How is it Assessed , 2012 .

[26]  Fredrik Aspling,et al.  Animals, plants, people and digital technology: exploring and understanding multispecies-computer interaction , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[27]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto , 2011, INTR.

[28]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction (ACI): changing perspective on HCI, participation and sustainability , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[29]  Lene Juul Pedersen,et al.  Using motivation tests to assess ethological needs and preferences , 2008 .

[30]  Ben Mepham,et al.  The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition or Regulation? , 2010, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[31]  Marcus Carter,et al.  Cross-disciplinary perspectives on animal welfare science and animal-computer interaction , 2015, Advances in Computer Entertainment.

[32]  Gordon M. Burghardt,et al.  Critical anthropomorphism, uncritical anthropocentrism, and naïve nominalism , 2006 .

[33]  Steve North,et al.  Do Androids dream of electric steeds? , 2016, Interactions.