On-Board Fuel Property Identification Method Based on High-Pressure Common Rail Pressure Signal

This paper investigates the impact of fuel property variations on the common rail pressure fluctuation in high-pressure common rail (HPCR) system and explores the possibility of identifying the fuel types based on the measurement of rail pressure for internal combustion engines. Fluid transients, particularly the water hammer effect in a HPCR system, are discussed and the 1D governing equations are given. A typical HPCR system model is developed in GT-Suite with the injectors, three-plunger high-pressure pump, and pressure control valve being modeled in a relatively high level of detail. Four different fuels including gasoline, ethanol, diesel, and biodiesel are modeled and their properties including density, bulk modulus, and acoustic wave speed are validated against data in the literature. Simulation results are obtained under different conditions with variable rail pressures and engine speeds. To reduce the excessive rail pressure oscillation caused by multiple injections, only four main-injections are enabled in each engine revolution. The results show that the natural frequency of a common rail varies with the type of fuel filled in it. By applying the fast Fourier transform (FFT) to the pressure signal, the differences of fuel properties can be revealed in the frequency domain. The experiment validation is conducted on a medium-duty diesel engine, which is equipped with a typical HPCR system and piezo-electric injectors. Tests results are given for both pure No. 2 diesel and pure soybean biodiesel at different rail pressure levels and different engine speeds. This approach is proved to be potentially useful for fuel property identification of gasoline-ethanol or diesel-biodiesel blends on internal combustion engines.

[1]  Javad Mohammadpour,et al.  Real-Time and Robust Estimation of Biodiesel Blends Based on Fuel Consumption and Crankshaft Torsionals , 2011 .

[2]  David L. Harrington,et al.  Automotive Spark-Ignited Direct-Injection Gasoline Engines , 2000 .

[3]  David B. Snyder,et al.  Steady-State Biodiesel Blend Estimation via a Wideband Oxygen Sensor , 2009 .

[4]  Mohamed Salah Ghidaoui,et al.  A Review of Water Hammer Theory and Practice , 2005 .

[5]  Heiko Kubach,et al.  Effects of increased injection pressures of up to 1000 bar – opportunities in stratified operation in a direct-injection spark-ignition engine , 2010 .

[6]  A. K. Mitra,et al.  Radial and Axial Variations in Transient Pressure Waves Transmitted Through Liquid Transmission Lines , 1985 .

[7]  Junmin Wang,et al.  On-Board Fuel Property Identification Method Based on Common Rail Pressure Signal , 2012 .

[8]  Junfeng Zhao,et al.  Energy-based and oxygen-based biodiesel blend level estimation methods for diesel engines , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[9]  E. Benjamin Wylie,et al.  Fluid Transients in Systems , 1993 .

[10]  Junmin Wang,et al.  Effect of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Biodiesel Blend Level Estimation in Diesel Engines , 2013 .

[11]  Javad Mohammadpour,et al.  Real-Time and Robust Estimation of Biodiesel Blends Using NOx Sensor , 2011 .

[12]  Fengjun Yan,et al.  Common rail injection system iterative learning control based parameter calibration for accurate fuel injection quantity control , 2011 .

[13]  Marco Coppo,et al.  Numerical analysis and experimental investigation of a common rail-type diesel injector , 2002 .