Abstract Multiunit site selection models have long ignored the impact of time delays in store openings. To determine the effect of this limitation and to identify a solution, we compare three multiunit site selection procedures. The first is a sequential procedure that selects sites and then opens them one at a time. The second is a global approach that selects all future sites in a single decision process. Third, is a proposed anticipated-delay procedure that incorporates opening delays, firm planning horizons and discount rates in determining appropriate sites for multiunit retail systems. We further compare the results of these site-selection procedures to similar procedures that incorporate leakage to unidentified competitors when seeking locations for new outlets. We make the comparisons based upon discounted revenues by using a two-party, game-like simulation. The simulation estimates revenue results under the various alternatives while allowing for reactive and preemptive competitive store openings. Our results indicate that the anticipated-delay procedure incorporating leakage produces a significantly better revenue stream than either the standard sequential or global approach procedures.
[1]
C. Craig,et al.
Formulating Retail Location Strategy in a Changing Environment
,
1983
.
[2]
Avijit Ghosh,et al.
FRANSYS: a franchise distribution system location model
,
1991
.
[3]
Lee G. Cooper,et al.
Parameter Estimation for a Multiplicative Competitive Interaction Model—Least Squares Approach
,
1974
.
[4]
Allen J. Scott,et al.
Combinatorial programming, spatial analysis and planning
,
1971
.
[5]
Lars Lundqvist,et al.
Dynamic allocation of urban space
,
1975
.
[6]
Patrick J. Kaufmann,et al.
A Model for Managing System Conflict during Franchise Expansion
,
1990
.
[7]
S. McLafferty,et al.
Location Strategies for Retail and Service Firms
,
1987
.