Strong selection on a gene that influences reproductive competition in a social insect

COMPETITION among nestmate females for reproductive opportunities is a fundamental property of insect societies, the outcome of which defines the form of colony social organization and the nature of subsequent social evolution1–3. Several factors influencing the outcome of competition among potential reproductives have been identified in eusocial Hymenoptera, including age4, size5–7 and degree of ovary or exocrine gland development7–10. In no case is the genetic basis of traits associated with success in these social contests understood, although there is a heritable component to their expression in laying worker honey bees11. I report here the existence of a single mendelian factor that strongly influences success in reproductive competition in multiple-queen societies of an ant, and I also propose a mechanism by which variation is maintained at this gene despite the presence of strong directional selection.

[1]  E. Vargo,et al.  Colony Reproduction by Budding in the Polygyne Form of Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1989 .

[2]  H. Velthuis,et al.  Differentiation in Reproductive Physiology and Behaviour During the Development of Laying Worker Honey Bees , 1990 .

[3]  M. Blum,et al.  Nuptial flight and flight ranges of the imported fire ant, Solenopsis saevissima richteri (Hymenoptera : Formicidae). , 1971 .

[4]  E. Wilson The Insect Societies , 1974 .

[5]  Robert W. Matthews,et al.  The social biology of wasps. , 1991 .

[6]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Gerontocracy in the social wasp, Polistes exclamans , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  H. L. Collins,et al.  Colony Founding by Queens of the Red Imported Fire Ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1972 .

[8]  K. Ross,et al.  Regulation of Reproduction in Eusocial Hymenoptera , 1985 .

[9]  B. H. Smith,et al.  RELATEDNESS AND POPULATION STRUCTURE OF THE PRIMITIVELY EUSOCIAL BEE LASIOGLOSSUM ZEPHYRUM (HYMENOPTERA: HALICTIDAE) IN KANSAS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  M. Blum,et al.  Pheromonal control of dealation and oogenesis in virgin queen fire ants. , 1981, Science.

[11]  C. Michener Reproduction and Castes in Social Halictine Bees , 1990 .

[12]  W. Engels,et al.  Social Insects: An Evolutionary Approach to Castes and Reproduction , 2011 .

[13]  K. Ross,et al.  Differential viability of eggs laid by queens in polygyne colonies of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1989 .

[14]  M. Blum,et al.  Regulation of Queen Number by Workers in Colonies of Social Insects , 1983, Science.

[15]  Bruce S. Weir Genetic Data Analysis , 1990 .

[16]  D. Tinkle,et al.  Natural Selection and Social Behavior: Recent Research and New Theory , 1981 .

[17]  C. S. Lofgren,et al.  Student Symposium: Alternatives to Chemical Control of Insects: Adoption of Newly-Mated Queens: A Mechanism for Proliferation and Perpetuation of Polygynous Red Imported Fire Ants, Solenopsis Invicta Buren , 1988 .

[18]  K. G. Adiyodi,et al.  Advances in invertebrate reproduction , 1977 .

[19]  E. Vargo,et al.  Effect of queen number on the production of sexuals in natural populations of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1987 .

[20]  GENETIC ORIGIN OF MALE DIPLOIDY IN THE FIRE ANT, SOLENOPSIS INVICTA (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE), AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE , 1985, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.