Gas holdup of rotating foam reactors measured by γ‐tomography—effect of solid foam pore size and liquid viscosity

Rotating foam reactors have already shown to give high mass transfer rates compared to stirred tank reactors. For a deeper insight into the hydrodynamics of these reactors, the hydrodynamics of rotating foam reactors were studied using -ray tomography. The two phase flow through the foam block stirrer is mainly influenced by the solid foam pore size and the liquid viscosity. For low viscosity, the optimal foam block pore size was identified in the range between 10 and 20 ppi. With smaller pore size, the gas-holdup inside the foam block strongly increases due to bubble entrapment. For higher viscosity, pore sizes larger than 10 ppi have to be used in order to achieve a sufficient liquid flow rate through the foam block to avoid a strong gradient over the reactor height. The effect of the hydrodynamics on the gas-liquid and liquid-solid mass transfer and the reactor performance are discussed.

[1]  Haibo Jin,et al.  The axial distribution of holdups in an industrial-scale bubble column with evaluated pressure using γ-ray attenuation approach , 2005 .

[2]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Quantitative measurement of gas hold-up distribution in a stirred chemical reactor using X-ray cone-beam computed tomography , 2008 .

[3]  Angélique Léonard,et al.  Phase distribution measurements in metallic foam packing using X-ray radiography and micro-tomography , 2009 .

[4]  M. Duduković,et al.  From Laboratory to Field Tomography: Data Collection and Performance Assessment , 2011 .

[5]  van der J John Schaaf,et al.  Solid foam packings for multiphase reactors: Modelling of liquid holdup and mass transfer , 2006 .

[6]  Vivek V. Ranade,et al.  Gas–liquid flow generated by a Rushton turbine in stirred vessel: CARPT/CT measurements and CFD simulations , 2005 .

[7]  Muthanna H. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Measuring gas–liquid distribution in a pilot scale monolith reactor via an Industrial Tomography Scanner (ITS) , 2007 .

[8]  L. Pel,et al.  Non-isothermal drying of fired-clay brick, an NMR study , 2009 .

[9]  U. Hampel,et al.  Experimental two-phase flow measurement using ultra fast limited-angle-type electron beam X-ray computed tomography , 2009 .

[10]  Tomasz Dyakowski,et al.  GAS-LIQUID AND MISCIBLE LIQUID MIXING IN A PLANT-SCALE VESSEL MONITORED USING ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE TOMOGRAPHY , 1999 .

[11]  Katherine A. Koen,et al.  Time-of-flight flow imaging of two-component flow inside a microfluidic chip. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[12]  Jason J. Ford,et al.  X-ray computed tomography of a gas-sparged stirred-tank reactor , 2008 .

[13]  Charlotte Pham,et al.  Experimental measurements and multiphase flow models in solid SiC foam beds , 2008 .

[14]  D. Schweich,et al.  Towards a more realistic modeling of solid foam: Use of the pentagonal dodecahedron geometry , 2009 .

[15]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Tomography measurements of gas holdup in rotating foam reactors with Newtonian, non-Newtonian and foaming liquid , 2011 .

[16]  Uwe Hampel,et al.  Application of high-resolution gamma ray tomography to the measurement of gas hold-up distributions in a stirred chemical reactor , 2007 .

[17]  Milorad P. Dudukovic,et al.  Mass-transfer in rotating packed beds—II. Experimental results and comparison with theory and gravity flow , 1989 .

[18]  Jc Jaap Schouten,et al.  Gas-liquid mass transfer in rotating solid foam reactors , 2010 .

[19]  J. B. Segur,et al.  Viscosity of Glycerol and Its Aqueous Solutions , 1951 .

[20]  Sadatoshi Taneda,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Wakes behind Cylinders and Plates at Low Reynolds Numbers , 1956 .

[21]  P. Shankar,et al.  Experimental determination of the kinematic viscosity of glycerol-water mixtures , 1994, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Lynn F. Gladden,et al.  Recent Advances in MRI Studies of Chemical Reactors: Ultrafast Imaging of Multiphase Flows , 2003 .

[23]  Joseph N. Gray,et al.  An X-ray system for visualizing fluid flows , 2008 .

[24]  M. Al-Dahhan,et al.  Phase distribution in an upflow monolith reactor using computed tomography , 2006 .

[25]  J. Joshi,et al.  Measurement of Gas Hold-up Profiles in Bubble Column by Gamma Ray Tomography: Effect of Liquid Phase Properties , 2000 .

[26]  F. Walsh,et al.  Reticulated vitreous carbon cathodes for metal ion removal from process streams part I: Mass transport studies , 1991 .

[27]  Freek Kapteijn,et al.  Gas and liquid distribution in the monolith film flow reactor , 2003 .

[28]  Joseph N. Gray,et al.  X-ray computed tomography in large bubble columns , 2005 .

[29]  Mi Wang,et al.  Measurements of gas-liquid mixing in a stirred vessel using electrical resistance tomography (ERT) , 2000 .

[30]  Y. Chisti,et al.  Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors , 2006 .

[31]  Faïçal Larachi,et al.  Dynamics of filtration in monolith reactors using electrical capacitance tomography , 2010 .

[32]  I. Hoek,et al.  Towards the catalytic application of a monolithic stirrer reactor , 2004 .

[33]  Jc Jaap Schouten,et al.  Liquid−Solid Mass Transfer in Agitated Slurry Reactors and Rotating Solid Foam Reactors , 2010 .

[34]  Adrian Zenklusen,et al.  Axial dispersion in metal foams and streamwise-periodic porous media , 2011 .

[35]  G. Baron,et al.  Micro-fiber elements as perfusive catalysts or in catalytic mixers: Flow, mixing and mass transfer , 2005 .

[36]  Ehud J. Schmidt,et al.  Gas–liquid phase distribution and void fraction measurements using MRI , 2005 .

[37]  F. Chenlo,et al.  Kinematic viscosity and water activity of aqueous solutions of glycerol and sodium chloride , 2004 .

[38]  Hristo Vesselinov Hristov,et al.  A study on the two-phase flow in a stirred tank reactor agitated by a gas-inducing turbine , 2008 .

[39]  Sailesh Kumar,et al.  A γ-ray tomographic scanner for imaging voidage distribution in two-phase flow systems , 1995 .

[40]  J. P. Du Plessis,et al.  Pressure drop modelling in cellular metallic foams , 2002 .

[41]  Gabriel Wild,et al.  Measuring techniques in gas–liquid and gas–liquid–solid reactors , 2002 .

[42]  Chia-Chang Lin,et al.  Characteristics of a rotating packed bed equipped with blade packings , 2007 .

[43]  Guy A. Dumont,et al.  Cavern formation in pulp suspensions using side-entering axial-flow impellers , 2009 .

[44]  D. Rao,et al.  Process intensification in a trickle‐bed reactor: Experimental studies , 2005 .

[45]  Michael J. Hoffmann,et al.  Preparation of Transparent Glass Sponges via Replica Method using High‐Purity Silica , 2010 .

[46]  Matthew H. M. Lim,et al.  Insights into the Mechanism of the Trickle-to-Pulse Transition in Trickle-Bed Reactors , 2005 .