Pathologic Fracture in Osteosarcoma: Prognostic Importance and Treatment Implications

Background: The presence of a pathologic fracture in an osteosarcoma has been considered a poor prognostic factor and an indication for immediate amputation. The purpose of the present study was to determine, in the current era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whether a pathologic fracture in an osteosarcoma has prognostic importance and whether limb salvage can be safely performed in such patients without compromising clinical outcome. Methods: In a cooperative effort of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, members from eight institutions provided retrospective data on fifty-two patients with osteosarcoma who had a pathologic fracture and on fifty-five patients with osteosarcoma who had not had a pathologic fracture and had been followed for at least two years or until disease recurrence, metastasis, or death. The two groups were matched for patient age and tumor location. Outcomes examined were survival and local recurrence. A subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in outcome within the group with the pathologic fracture. Results: The five-year estimated survival rates were 55% for the group with a pathologic fracture and 77% for the group without a fracture (p = 0.02). The rate of survival without a local recurrence at five years was 75% for the group with a fracture and 96% for the group without a fracture (p = 0.007). In the group with a fracture, seven (23%) of the thirty patients managed with limb salvage and four (18%) of the twenty-two managed with an amputation had a local recurrence (p = 0.75). Eleven (37%) of the thirty patients with a fracture who were managed with limb salvage and ten (45%) of the twenty-two patients with a fracture who were managed with an amputation died of the disease (p = 0.50). Five patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation followed by limb-salvage surgery. Two of them had a local recurrence and died at an average of eight months postoperatively. The remaining three patients were alive at an average of 6.1 years postoperatively. Local disease control and the survival of these patients were not significantly different from those for the thirty-three patients who were treated with nonoperative immobilization of the fracture followed by limb-salvage surgery. Conclusions: Patients with osteosarcoma who present with a pathologic fracture or sustain one during preoperative chemotherapy have an increased risk of local recurrence and a decreased rate of survival compared with patients who have not sustained a pathologic fracture. The performance of a limb-salvage procedure in carefully selected patients with a pathologic fracture does not significantly increase the risk of local recurrence or death. Factors predictive of improved outcome, such as the response to chemotherapy and union of the fracture, should be taken into account when limb salvage is being considered.

[1]  H J Mankin,et al.  Limb-salvage treatment versus amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  G. Bacci Pathologic fracture in osteosarcoma. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  B. Widhe,et al.  Initial Symptoms and Clinical Features in Osteosarcoma and Ewing Sarcoma* , 2000, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  R. Grimer,et al.  The surgical treatment and outcome of pathological fractures in localised osteosarcoma. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  S. Scully,et al.  The Surgical Treatment of Patients With Osteosarcoma Who Sustain a Pathologic Fracture , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  H. Kroon,et al.  Radiologic Atlas of Bone Tumors , 1993 .

[7]  A. Craft,et al.  A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults: the first study of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  G. Rosen,et al.  Survival, prognosis, and therapeutic response in osteogenic sarcoma. The memorial hospital experience , 1992, Cancer.

[9]  W. Enneking,et al.  Surgical treatment for osteosarcoma. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  M. Simon Limb salvage for osteosarcoma. , 1988, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  N. Jaffe,et al.  Pathologic fracture in osteosarcoma. Impact of chemotherapy on primary tumor and survival , 1987, Cancer.

[12]  J. Shuster,et al.  The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse-free survival in patients with osteosarcoma of the extremity. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  W. Enneking A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[15]  B. Coley,et al.  FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PROGNOSIS IN OSTEOGENIC SARCOMA. , 1940, Annals of surgery.

[16]  G Rosen,et al.  Chemotherapy for nonmetastatic osteogenic sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Simon,et al.  Limb-salvage surgery in the treatment of osteosarcoma in skeletally immature individuals. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[18]  W. Taylor,et al.  Prognostic variables in osteosarcoma: a multi-institutional study. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  D. Dahlin Osteosarcoma of bone and a consideration of prognostic variables. , 1978, Cancer treatment reports.

[20]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .