Cable tray fire tests in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility

Cable fires are one of the main fire hazards in nuclear power plants. As part of the cable fire spreading (CFS) campaign of the OECD PRISME-2 programme, 3 real-scale cable tray fire tests were performed in open atmosphere (1 CFS support test, named CFSS-2) and in a confined and mechanically ventilated facility (2 CFS tests, named CFS-3 and CFS-4). This study aims at investigating the effects of confined and ventilated conditions on cable tray fires that used a halogen-free flame retardant cable-type. The CFS-3 and CFS-4 tests involved 2 ventilation renewal rates of 4 and 15 h−1, respectively. The confined conditions lead to decrease the fire growth rate and the peaks of mass loss rate and heat release rate, compared with open atmosphere. The reductions are larger for the lower ventilation renewal rate. Furthermore, it is shown that the CFS-4 test may be classified as a well-ventilated fire and the CFS-3 test as an under-ventilated fire. For this last one, its fire characteristics and its consequences in the fire room highlight an oscillatory behaviour, with the same low frequency, for about 30 minutes. These oscillations arise from successive combustions of unburnt gases.

[1]  Stephen J. Grayson,et al.  Assessing the fire performance of electric cables (FIPEC) , 2001 .

[2]  Hugues Pretrel,et al.  Experimental Study of the Fire Mass Loss Rate in Confined and Mechanically Ventilated Multi-Room Scenarios , 2008 .

[3]  Archibald Tewarson,et al.  Ventilation-controlled combustion of polymers , 1993 .

[4]  Marc Janssens,et al.  Measuring rate of heat release by oxygen consumption , 1991 .

[5]  Hugues Pretrel,et al.  Experimental Study of Burning Rate Behaviour in Confined and Ventilated Fire Compartments , 2005 .

[6]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations During Fire (CHRISTIFIRE) Phase 2: Vertical Shafts and Corridors | NIST , 2013 .

[7]  Laurent Audouin,et al.  Effects of vitiation on the heat release rate in mechanically-ventilated compartment fires , 2008 .

[8]  L. Delfosse,et al.  Combustion of ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer filled with aluminium and magnesium hydroxides , 1989 .

[9]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Cable Heat Release, Ignition, and Spread in Tray Installations during Fire (CHRISTIFIRE): Phase 1 - Horizontal Trays | NIST , 2012 .

[10]  T. R. Hull,et al.  Flame retardancy of some ethylene–vinyl acetate copolymer‐based formulations , 2000 .

[11]  S. Suard,et al.  Fuel Mass-Loss Rate Determination in a Confined and Mechanically Ventilated Compartment Fire Using a Global Approach , 2011 .

[12]  L. Audouin,et al.  Experimental determination of fire heat release rate with OC and CDG calorimetry for ventilated compartments fire scenario , 2014 .

[13]  Michael A. Delichatsios,et al.  Mass pyrolysis rates and excess pyrolysate in fully developed enclosure fires , 2004 .

[14]  J. Garo,et al.  Ventilation effects in confined and mechanically ventilated fires , 2014 .

[15]  Christian Delvosalle,et al.  The Measurement of Heat Release from Oxygen Consumption in Sooty Fires , 2000 .

[16]  W. Plumecocq,et al.  Energy balance in a confined fire compartment to assess the heat release rate of an electrical cabinet fire , 2012 .