Image Statistics and the Fine Lines of Material Perception

We experience vivid percepts of objects and materials despite complexities in the way images are structured by the interaction of light with surface properties (3D shape, albedo, and gloss or specularity). Although the perception of gloss (and lightness) has been argued to depend on image statistics (e.g., sub-band skew), studies have shown that perceived gloss depends critically on the structure of luminance variations in images. Here, we found that separately adapting observers to either positive or negative skew generated declines in perceived gloss, contrary to the predictions of theories involving image statistics. We also found similar declines in perceived gloss following adaptation to contours geometrically correlated with sharp specular edges. We further found this aftereffect was stronger when contour adaptors were aligned with specular edges compared with adaptation to the same contours rotated by 90°. These findings support the view that the perception of gloss depends critically on the visual system’s ability to encode specular edge structure and not image skew.

[1]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[2]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[3]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Lightness Constancy in the Presence of Specular Highlights , 2004, Psychological science.

[4]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[5]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Generative constraints on image cues for perceived gloss. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[6]  S. Anstis,et al.  Perceived depth from shading boundaries. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[7]  G. Orban,et al.  Perception of Three-Dimensional Shape From Specular Highlights, Deformations of Shading, and Other Types of Visual Information , 2004, Psychological science.

[8]  S. Anstis Contour adaptation. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[9]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[10]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance , 2012, Current Biology.

[11]  Ofir Weber,et al.  Conformal mesh deformations with Möbius transformations , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[12]  Roland W Fleming,et al.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[13]  A. Torralba,et al.  Specular reflections and the perception of shape. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[14]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[15]  Robert J. Rothfarb,et al.  SimsalaGrimm: fairy-tale themed on-line 3D community , 2000, COMG.

[16]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[17]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The dark side of gloss , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Texture-shading flow interactions and perceived reflectance. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[19]  Gregory J. Ward,et al.  The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  Highlights and the perception of glossiness , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. , 2011, Journal of vision.