Video-guided versus direct laryngoscopy: considerations for using simulation to teach inexperienced medical students

The goal of this study was to determine whether video laryngoscopy (VL) provides any advantage over direct laryngoscopy (DL) in first-attempt intubations. This was a controlled, randomized study of 120 medical students. Students were randomly assigned to either of 2 intubation groups, which used (1) DL (n=64) or (2) VL (n=56) with the Karl Storz C-MAC® video laryngoscope. Each student attempted 1 endotracheal intubation on a Laerdal® Airway Management Trainer. The primary outcome measure was the time for successful endotracheal intubation. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of esophageal intubation (EI), excess application of pressure on the maxillary incisor teeth (EMP), and first-time success rate. Mean time for endotracheal intubation was significantly faster in the VL group than in the DL group (101 ± 83 seconds vs. 180 ± 102.5 seconds; P<0.001). In the VL group, 3.6% of the students committed an EI versus 56.3% in the DL group (P<0.001). No significant difference was found in the incidence of EMP: 51.8% in the VL group versus 57.8% in the DL group (P=0.508). For medical students with little or no endotracheal intubation experience, VL facilitates success and decreases the number of EIs, at least in a simulated environment.

[1]  S J Stratton,et al.  Prospective study of manikin-only versus manikin and human subject endotracheal intubation training of paramedics. , 1991, Annals of emergency medicine.

[2]  K L Posner,et al.  Airway injury during anesthesia: a closed claims analysis. , 1999, Anesthesiology.

[3]  H. Owen,et al.  Learning Endotracheal Intubation in a Clinical Skills Learning Center: A Quantitative Study , 2001, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  George Berci,et al.  A new video laryngoscope-an aid to intubation and teaching. , 2002, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[5]  Chris Field,et al.  Laryngoscopic Intubation: Learning and Performance , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[6]  B. Harte,et al.  Learning and performance of tracheal intubation by novice personnel: a comparison of the Airtraq® and Macintosh laryngoscope , 2006, Anaesthesia.

[7]  George Berci,et al.  Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. , 2006, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[8]  D. Hess,et al.  Urgent tracheal intubation in general hospital units: an observational study. , 2007, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[9]  R. Steadman,et al.  Video-assisted instruction improves the success rate for tracheal intubation by novices. , 2008, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  D. Healy,et al.  The use of the BERCI DCI® Video Laryngoscope for teaching novices direct laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation * , 2008, Anaesthesia.

[11]  Ron Medzon,et al.  Comparison of Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy in the Difficult Airway Using High-Fidelity Simulation , 2009, Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

[12]  Peter A. Wieringa,et al.  Forces Applied to the Maxillary Incisors During Video-Assisted Intubation , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  A. Vlatten,et al.  A comparison of the STORZ video laryngoscope and standard direct laryngoscopy for intubation in the Pediatric airway – a randomized clinical trial , 2009, Paediatric anaesthesia.

[14]  Timothy F Platts-Mills,et al.  A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[15]  Liang Shen,et al.  Experiential learning improves the learning and retention of endotracheal intubation , 2009, Medical education.

[16]  C. Karsli,et al.  A comparison between the GlideScope® Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways – a pilot study , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[17]  T. Xanthos,et al.  Video‐laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature , 2010, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  A G Butchart,et al.  The learning curve for videolaryngoscopy , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[19]  M F El-Khatib,et al.  Tracheal intubation following training with the GlideScope® compared to direct laryngoscopy , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[20]  R Maassen,et al.  Correspondence: Comparison of the C‐MAC® videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh, Glidescope® and Airtraq® laryngoscopes in easy and difficult laryngoscopy scenarios in manikins , 2010, Anaesthesia.

[21]  Jürgen Peters,et al.  Learning Endotracheal Intubation Using a Novel Videolaryngoscope Improves Intubation Skills of Medical Students , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[22]  R. Levitan,et al.  The complexities of tracheal intubation with direct laryngoscopy and alternative intubation devices. , 2011, Annals of emergency medicine.

[23]  Nathan Delson,et al.  The Effect of Cross-Training with Adjustable Airway Model Anatomies on Laryngoscopy Skill Transfer , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[24]  Ben H. Boedeker,et al.  Combined Intubation Training (Simulated and Human) for 4th Year Medical Students: The Center for Advanced Technology and Telemedicine Airway Training Program , 2011, MMVR.

[25]  Adam de Laveaga,et al.  Ergonomics of novices and experts during simulated endotracheal intubation. , 2012, Work.

[26]  Helmut Ringl,et al.  Degrees of Reality: Airway Anatomy of High-fidelity Human Patient Simulators and Airway Trainers , 2012, Anesthesiology.