Mechanism-Based Classification of PAH Mixtures to Predict Carcinogenic Potential.

We have previously shown that relative potency factors and DNA adduct measurements are inadequate for predicting carcinogenicity of certain polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and PAH mixtures, particularly those that function through alternate pathways or exhibit greater promotional activity compared to benzo[a]pyrene (BaP). Therefore, we developed a pathway-based approach for classification of tumor outcome after dermal exposure to PAH/mixtures. FVB/N mice were exposed to dibenzo[def,p]chrysene (DBC), BaP, or environmental PAH mixtures (Mix 1-3) following a 2-stage initiation/promotion skin tumor protocol. Resulting tumor incidence could be categorized by carcinogenic potency as DBC >> BaP = Mix2 = Mix3 > Mix1 = Control, based on statistical significance. Gene expression profiles measured in skin of mice collected 12 h post-initiation were compared with tumor outcome for identification of short-term bioactivity profiles. A Bayesian integration model was utilized to identify biological pathways predictive of PAH carcinogenic potential during initiation. Integration of probability matrices from four enriched pathways (P < .05) for DNA damage, apoptosis, response to chemical stimulus, and interferon gamma signaling resulted in the highest classification accuracy with leave-one-out cross validation. This pathway-driven approach was successfully utilized to distinguish early regulatory events during initiation prognostic for tumor outcome and provides proof-of-concept for using short-term initiation studies to classify carcinogenic potential of environmental PAH mixtures. These data further provide a 'source-to-outcome' model that could be used to predict PAH interactions during tumorigenesis and provide an example of how mode-of-action-based risk assessment could be employed for environmental PAH mixtures.

[1]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[2]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[3]  L J Lesko,et al.  Systems Approaches in Risk Assessment , 2013, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[4]  K. Gallagher,et al.  A framework for the use of genomics data at the EPA , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  Amir F. Atiya,et al.  Estimating the Posterior Probabilities Using the K-Nearest Neighbor Rule , 2005, Neural Computation.

[6]  Sarah E. Reese,et al.  Non-additive hepatic gene expression elicited by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) and 2,2',4,4',5,5'-hexachlorobiphenyl (PCB153) co-treatment in C57BL/6 mice. , 2011, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[7]  Tatiana Nikolskaya,et al.  Functional analysis of OMICs data and small molecule compounds in an integrated "knowledge-based" platform. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[8]  Terence P. Speed,et al.  A comparison of normalization methods for high density oligonucleotide array data based on variance and bias , 2003, Bioinform..

[9]  Y. Huang The Role of in Vitro Gene Expression Profiling in Particulate Matter Health Research , 2013, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[10]  R. McClellan Hazard and risk: assessment and management , 2010 .

[11]  David E. Williams,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons as skin carcinogens: comparison of benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[def,p]chrysene and three environmental mixtures in the FVB/N mouse. , 2012, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[12]  U. Stenius,et al.  Interactions between polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in complex mixtures and implications for cancer risk assessment. , 2014, Toxicology.

[13]  W. Liang,et al.  9) TM4 Microarray Software Suite , 2006 .

[14]  Mi-Kyung Song,et al.  Identification of molecular signatures predicting the carcinogenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). , 2012, Toxicology letters.

[15]  David E. Williams,et al.  Application of a fuzzy neural network model in predicting polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-mediated perturbations of the Cyp1b1 transcriptional regulatory network in mouse skin. , 2013, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[16]  Harold F. Gómez,et al.  Genomic Models of Short-Term Exposure Accurately Predict Long-Term Chemical Carcinogenicity and Identify Putative Mechanisms of Action , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Thomas Backhaus,et al.  Hazard and Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures under REACH - State of the Art, Gaps and Options for Improvement. Swedish Chemicals Inspectorate , Report PM/3 2010 , 2010 .

[18]  Bobbie-Jo M. Webb-Robertson,et al.  VIBE 2.0: Visual Integration for Bayesian Evaluation , 2009, Bioinform..

[19]  T. Zacharewski,et al.  Automated dose-response analysis and comparative toxicogenomic evaluation of the hepatic effects elicited by TCDD, TCDF, and PCB126 in C57BL/6 mice. , 2010, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[20]  David M DeMarini,et al.  Transcriptional responses to complex mixtures: a review. , 2007, Mutation research.

[21]  Joel G. Pounds,et al.  Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 14:451-463 (2009) A BAYESIAN INTEGRATION MODEL OF HIGH- THROUGHPUT PROTEOMICS AND METABOLOMICS DATA FOR IMPROVED EARLY DETECTION OF MICROBIAL INFECTIONS , 2022 .

[22]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  Analysis of Variance for Gene Expression Microarray Data , 2000, J. Comput. Biol..

[23]  V. Arlt,et al.  The influence of diesel exhaust on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-induced DNA damage, gene expression, and tumor initiation in Sencar mice in vivo. , 2008, Cancer letters.

[24]  S. Burchiel,et al.  Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. , 2010, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.

[25]  A I Saeed,et al.  TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis. , 2003, BioTechniques.