OBJECTIVE
To develop and pilot test a telephone-based survey instrument that enables parents to identify and characterize the body region and severity of childhood injuries using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scoring system.
DESIGN
A prospective cross-sectional survey.
SETTING
The emergency department of an urban, tertiary care, pediatric trauma center.
PARTICIPANTS
One hundred forty-seven parents of children younger than 18 years and seen in the emergency department for acute treatment of an unintentional injury.
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE
The degree of agreement, measured as sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistic, between medical record information and parents' responses to the telephone survey regarding the identification and characterization of clinically significant (AIS > or =2) injuries.
RESULTS
The survey, known as the Injury Severity Assessment Survey/Parent Report, was developed via a systematic review of the AIS 1990 manual. Answers to questions were developed in a way that enabled automated coding of responses into AIS scores or ranges of scores. The sensitivity of the survey (its ability to detect injuries scoring 2 or more on the AIS that were documented in the medical record) varied somewhat by the body region of injury, ranging from 88% for head, face, neck, and spine injuries to 95% for extremity injuries. Intermediate sensitivity (92%) was noted for the detection of significant chest and abdomen injuries. The specificity of the survey (its ability to rule out the presence of a significant injury when one was not documented in the medical record) was more than 95% in each of the 3 body region groups. The kappa statistics for the 3 body region groups ranged from 0.89 to 0.92.
CONCLUSIONS
A new telephone-based survey has been developed that enables parents to characterize their child's injuries by body region and to differentiate between minor injuries and more significant injuries using a well-established injury classification system. This survey has a significant advantage over previous telephone-based or written surveys of childhood injuries and may be particularly valuable in population-based (e.g., random-digit dial surveys) or multi-institutional studies of pediatric injuries.
[1]
Flaura Koplin Winston,et al.
A COMPREHENSIVE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM TO INVESTIGATE TARGETED ISSUES IN CHILD OCCUPANT PROTECTION
,
1998
.
[2]
I B Pless,et al.
Reliability and validity of proxy respondent information about childhood injury: an assessment of a Canadian surveillance system.
,
1997,
American journal of epidemiology.
[3]
S. Derk,et al.
Injury in West Virginia: a statewide survey.
,
1996,
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[4]
G R Griffith,et al.
Australian farm work injuries: incidence, diversity and personal risk factors.
,
1996,
The Australian journal of rural health.
[5]
R. Gofin,et al.
The development of disability scales for childhood and adolescent injuries.
,
1995,
Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[6]
I B Pless,et al.
How well they remember. The accuracy of parent reports.
,
1995,
Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine.
[7]
P. Scheidt,et al.
The effects of recall on estimating annual nonfatal injury rates for children and adolescents.
,
1994,
American journal of public health.
[8]
A. Coulter,et al.
accidents: a practice survey using general practitioners' records and parental reports
,
2006
.
[9]
Stephen Z. Turney,et al.
An ICD-9CM to AIS conversion table: Development and application
,
1986
.
[10]
Susan C. Partyka,et al.
A comparison of AIS and ISS predictions of fatality on NCSS
,
1980
.
[11]
Rating the severity of tissue damage. I. The abbreviated scale.
,
1971,
JAMA.