From methods to methodology: Reflection on keeping the philosophical commitments of interpretative phenomenological analysis

This paper details the transition of one researcher in his journey from attending to the methods of research to identifying and enacting the methodology of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). In the backdrop of this paper is a larger qualitative study that is employing IPA to understand a rich picture of how engineering student become engineers, particularly by attending to the fuzzy boundaries between technical and social features of this identity. To ground the discussion of the paper, we draw on a transcript from a single interview in this study conducted with Kevin, a graduating mechanical engineer. We transparently share a reflexive account of conducting IPA research in order to introduce IPA as an excellent research tool for open areas of engineering education research. Further, our goals are to instill confidence in novice qualitative researchers as they embark on the arduous but rewarding path of conducting engineering education research using qualitative methods.

[1]  Catherine T. Amelink,et al.  Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education , 2009 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Cognitive artifacts , 1991 .

[3]  Reed Stevens,et al.  Becoming an Engineer: Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning , 2008 .

[4]  W. Faulkner Dualisms, Hierarchies and Gender in Engineering , 2000 .

[5]  Alice L. Pawley,et al.  "Learning from small numbers" of underrepresented students' stories: Dis- cussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative , 2013 .

[6]  Brenda Capobianco,et al.  Undergraduate Women Engineering Their Professional Identities , 2006 .

[7]  Jennifer Turns,et al.  Constructing Professional Portfolios: Sense‐Making and Professional Identity Development for Engineering Undergraduates , 2011 .

[8]  Jonathan A. Smith Beyond the divide between cognition and discourse: using interpretative phenomenological analysis in health psychology , 1996 .

[9]  Maura Borrego,et al.  Conceptual Difficulties Experienced by Trained Engineers Learning Educational Research Methods , 2007 .

[10]  Jonathan A. Smith ‘We could be diving for pearls’: The value of the gem in experiential qualitative psychology , 2011, QMiP Bulletin.

[11]  J. Trevelyan Reconstructing engineering from practice , 2010 .

[12]  Barbara M. Moskal,et al.  Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations , 2005 .

[13]  William C. Oakes,et al.  Making Sense of Design: A Thematic Analysis of Alumni Perspectives , 2013 .

[14]  Cindy E. Foor,et al.  “I Wish that I Belonged More in this Whole Engineering Group:” Achieving Individual Diversity , 2007 .

[15]  Tomas Jungert,et al.  Social identities among engineering students and through their transition to work: a longitudinal study , 2013 .

[16]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study , 2013 .

[17]  J. Jorgenson Engineering Selves , 2002 .