Compound words and structure in the lexicon

The structure of lexical entries and the status of lexical decomposition remain controversial. In the psycholinguistic literature, one aspect of this debate concerns the psychological reality of the morphological complexity difference between compound words (teacup) and single words (crescent). The present study investigates morphological decomposition in compound words using visual lexical decision with simultaneous magnetoencephalography (MEG), comparing compounds, single words, and pseudomorphemic foils. The results support an account of lexical processing which includes early decomposition of morphologically complex words into constituents. The behavioural differences suggest internally structured representations for compound words, and the early effects of constituents in the electrophysiological signal support the hypothesis of early morphological parsing. These findings add to a growing literature suggesting that the lexicon includes structured representations, consistent with previous findings supporting early morphological parsing using other tasks. The results do not favour two putative constraints, word length and lexicalisation, on early morphological-structure based computation.

[1]  A. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Pienie Zwitserlood,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds , 1994 .

[3]  Juan Segui,et al.  Morphological processing in word recognition:a review with particular reference to spanish data , 2000 .

[4]  Ingo Plag,et al.  Morphological Productivity , 1999 .

[5]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .

[6]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Word Length and Orthographic Neighborhood Size Effects in the Left and Right Cerebral Hemispheres , 2002, Brain and Language.

[7]  K. Rastle,et al.  The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English , 2004 .

[8]  K I Forster,et al.  The Pros and Cons of Masked Priming , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[9]  D. Kirsh,et al.  Proceedings of the 25th annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2003 .

[10]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  Early influences of word length and frequency: a group study using MEG , 2003, Neuroreport.

[11]  Miguel A. Pozo,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence of automatic early semantic processing , 2004, Brain and Language.

[12]  Gary Libben,et al.  Processing Compounds: A Cross-Linguistic Study , 1999, Brain and Language.

[13]  Valerie A. Carr,et al.  Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Modality-Specific and Supramodal Word Processing , 2003, Neuron.

[14]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[15]  Heikki Lyytinen,et al.  Cortical Activation during Spoken-Word Segmentation in Nonreading-Impaired and Dyslexic Adults , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  O. Bertrand,et al.  Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  John B. Carroll,et al.  The American Heritage Word Frequency Book , 1971 .

[18]  K. Forster The Microgenesis of Priming Effects in Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[19]  D. Balota,et al.  Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Reading and the Mental Lexicon , 1991 .

[21]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Morphology in word recognition , 1998 .

[22]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  The interpretation of isolated novel nominal compounds , 1991, Memory & cognition.

[23]  A. Marantz,et al.  A magnetoencephalographic component whose latency reflects lexical frequency. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[24]  E. G. Jones Cerebral Cortex , 1987, Cerebral Cortex.

[25]  P. Luce,et al.  Probabilistic Phonotactics and Neighborhood Activation in Spoken Word Recognition , 1999 .

[26]  Sachiko Koyama,et al.  Reading of Japanese Kanji (morphograms) and Kana (syllabograms): a magnetoencephalographic study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  Riitta Salmelin,et al.  Cortical Effects of Shifting Letter Position in Letter Strings of Varying Length , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  H. J. Jaarsveld,et al.  Frequency effects in the processing of lexicalized and novel nominal compounds , 1988 .

[29]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Distinct time courses of word and context comprehension in the left temporal cortex. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  R Kakigi,et al.  Evoked magnetic responses during a word completion task. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[31]  Gary Libben,et al.  Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness , 2003, Brain and Language.

[32]  Andrew Spencer,et al.  Ingo Plag, Morphological Productivity. Structural Constraints on English Derivation. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. , 2001 .

[33]  K I Forster,et al.  Decomposing morphologically complex words in a nonlinear morphology. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[34]  Alec Marantz,et al.  The precise time course of lexical activation: MEG measurements of the effects of frequency, probability, and density in lexical decision , 2004, Brain and Language.

[35]  K. Forster,et al.  What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked-priming investigation of morphological representation. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  K. Rayner,et al.  Early morphological effects in word recognition in Hebrew: Evidence from parafoveal preview benefit , 2000 .

[37]  Sachiko Kinoshita,et al.  Masked priming : the state of the art , 2003 .

[38]  Michael E. J. Masson,et al.  A Retrospective View of Masked Priming : Toward a Unified Account of Masked and Long-Term Repetition Priming , 2003 .

[39]  Y. Adachi,et al.  Reduction of non-periodic environmental magnetic noise in MEG measurement by continuously adjusted least squares method , 2001 .

[40]  R. Baayen,et al.  Shifting paradigms: gradient structure in morphology , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[41]  William Badecker,et al.  Stem Homographs and Lemma Level Representations , 2002, Brain and Language.

[42]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  The role of semantic transparency in the processing of Finnish compound words , 2005 .

[43]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[44]  J. Fletcher,et al.  Brain mechanisms for reading words and pseudowords: an integrated approach. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  A morphological effect obtains for isolated words but not for words in sentence context , 2002 .

[46]  Sachiko Koyama,et al.  The Effect of Stimulus Repetition on Cortical Magnetic Responses Evoked by Words and Nonwords , 2001, NeuroImage.

[47]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[48]  J. Elman An alternative view of the mental lexicon , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[50]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked cross-modal morphological priming: Unravelling morpho-orthographic and morpho-semantic influences in early word recognition , 2005 .

[51]  M. Masson,et al.  Masked priming of words and nonwords in a naming task: Further evidence for a nonlexical basis for priming , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[52]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[53]  R. Baayen,et al.  Affixal Homonymy triggers full-form storage, even with inflected words, even in a morphologically rich language , 2000, Cognition.

[54]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  The role of context in morphological processing: Evidence from Finnish , 2000 .

[55]  R. Baayen,et al.  Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model , 1997 .

[56]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity , 1992 .

[57]  K. M. Gill,et al.  Word length and exposure time effects on the recognition of bilaterally presented words , 1974 .

[58]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Semantic Cortical Activation in Dyslexic Readers , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[60]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Reading morphologically complex words: Some thoughts from masked priming. , 2003 .

[61]  Robert Fiorentino,et al.  Masked morphological priming of compound constituents , 2009 .

[62]  Manuel Martín-Loeches,et al.  The Recognition Potential: An ERP Index of Lexical Access , 1999, Brain and Language.

[63]  J. McQueen Segmentation of Continuous Speech Using Phonotactics , 1998 .

[64]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Morpholexical Access and Naming: The Semantic Interpretability of New Root–Suffix Combinations , 1999, Brain and Language.

[65]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[66]  Ka Cormier,et al.  Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America , 2004 .

[67]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Parsing and productivity , 2002 .

[68]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Morpho-lexical Representations in Naming , 1997 .

[69]  W J Levelt,et al.  Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[70]  J. Hyönä,et al.  The length of a complex word modifies the role of morphological structure: Evidence from eye movements when reading short and long Finnish compounds , 2003 .

[71]  S Braeutigam,et al.  Phase-locked gamma band responses to semantic violation stimuli. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[72]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[73]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[74]  A. Ellis Progress in the psychology of language , 1985 .

[75]  B MacWhinney,et al.  Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[76]  Christina L. Gagné,et al.  Lexical and Relational Influences on the Processing of Novel Compounds , 2002, Brain and Language.

[77]  David Poeppel,et al.  The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[78]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  A tale of two frequencies: Determining the speed of lexical access for Mandarin Chinese and English compounds , 2008 .

[79]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[80]  Dieter Kastovsky,et al.  English word-formation , 1986 .

[81]  Marcus Taft,et al.  The processing of morpheme-like units in monomorphemic words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[82]  Laurie Bauer,et al.  English Word-Formation: Frontmatter , 1983 .

[83]  L. Manelis,et al.  The processing of affixed words , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[84]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.

[85]  M. Taft Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[86]  S. Small The neuroscience of language , 2008, Brain and Language.

[87]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of prime word frequency and cumulative root frequency in masked morphological priming , 2000 .

[88]  Judith N. Levi,et al.  The syntax and semantics of complex nominals , 1978 .

[89]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  The broth in my brother’s brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[90]  C Pantev,et al.  Magnetic brain activity evoked and induced by visually presented words and nonverbal stimuli. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[91]  S. Andrews,et al.  Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap , 2004 .

[92]  William Badecker,et al.  Stem Homograph Inhibition and Stem Allomorphy: Representing and Processing Inflected Forms in a Multilevel Lexical System☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[93]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Explaining derivational morphology as the convergence of codes , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[94]  David Poeppel,et al.  Decomposition of compound words: an MEG measure of early access to constituents , 2003 .

[95]  Michael C. Doyle,et al.  Effects of frequency on visual word recognition tasks: where are they? , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[96]  M. Taft Morphological Decomposition and the Reverse Base Frequency Effect , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[97]  Alec Marantz,et al.  Neural correlates of the effects of morphological family frequency and family size: an MEG study , 2004, Cognition.

[98]  Alec Marantz,et al.  A single route, full decomposition model of morphological complexity: MEG evidence , 2006 .

[99]  F. Pulvermüller The Neuroscience of Language , 2003 .

[100]  Victoria A. Fromkin,et al.  Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: The mental lexicon , 1988 .

[101]  David Poeppel,et al.  Processing correlates of lexical semantic complexity , 2003, Cognition.

[102]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[103]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[104]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological Priming Effect: The Role of Surface Frequency , 1999, Brain and Language.

[105]  R. Holloway The broth in my brother ’ s brothel : Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition , 2005 .

[106]  A. Jongman,et al.  Processing of English inflectional morphology , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[107]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Morphology by itself in planning the production of spoken words , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[108]  Sally Andrews,et al.  Racehorses, reindeer, and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification , 2003 .

[109]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1991 .

[110]  L. Henderson Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[111]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Neuromagnetic Evidence for the Timing of Lexical Activation: An MEG Component Sensitive to Phonotactic Probability but Not to Neighborhood Density , 2002, Brain and Language.

[112]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[113]  C. Petten,et al.  Neural localization of semantic context effects in electromagnetic and hemodynamic studies , 2006, Brain and Language.

[114]  Pamela A. Downing On the Creation and Use of English Compound Nouns. , 1977 .

[115]  W. Badecker,et al.  Morphological Parsing and the Perception of Lexical Identity: A Masked Priming Study of Stem Homographs , 2002 .

[116]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Reading Finnish compound words: eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[117]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study , 2000 .

[118]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  N400-like Magnetoencephalography Responses Modulated by Semantic Context, Word Frequency, and Lexical Class in Sentences , 2002, NeuroImage.

[119]  S. Andrews Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? , 1986 .

[120]  J. Segui,et al.  Morphological priming without morphological relationship , 2003 .

[121]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Basic issues in lexical processing , 1989 .

[122]  Lars Borin,et al.  What is a lexical representation? , 1985, NODALIDA.

[123]  L. Feldman,et al.  Morphological Priming: The Role of Prime Duration, Semantic Transparency, and Affix Position , 1999, Brain and Language.

[124]  L. Feldman,et al.  Are morphological effects distinguishable from the effects of shared meaning and shared form? , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[125]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Pre- and postlexical loci of contextual effects on word recognition , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[126]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: evidence from naming, lexical decisions and eye fixations. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[127]  A. Inhoff,et al.  Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[128]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  Somatotopic Representation of Action Words in Human Motor and Premotor Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[129]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Graded semantic and phonological similarity effects in priming: evidence for a distributed connectionist approach to morphology. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[130]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  The Representation of Polysemy: MEG Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[131]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[132]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[133]  J. Segui,et al.  On the representation and processing of prefixed and suffixed derived words: A differential frequency effect , 1989 .

[134]  L. Pylkkänen,et al.  Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.