In vivo optical detection of pH in microscopic tissue samples of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Minimally invasive in vivo measurement of pH in microscopic biological samples of μm or μl size, e.g. plant cells, tissues and saps, may help to explain complex biological processes. Consequently, techniques to achieve such measurements are a focus of interest for botanists. This paper describes a technique for the in vivo measurement of pH in the range pH5.0 to pH7.8 in microscopic plant tissue samples of Arabidopsis thaliana based on a ratiometric fluorescence method using low-loss robust tapered fiber probes. For this purpose tapered fiber probes were prepared and coated with a detection layer containing ion-paired fluorescent pH-transducer 8-hydroxypyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid trisodium salt (c-HPTS). A fluorescence ratiometric approach was employed based on excitation at 415 nm and 450 nm and on the comparison of the fluorescence response at 515 nm. The suitability of tapered fiber probes for local detection of pH between 5.0 and 7.8 was demonstrated. A pH sensitivity of 0.15 pH units was achieved within the pH ranges 5.0-5.9 and 7.1-7.8, and this was improved to 0.04 pH units within the pH range 5.9-7.1. Spatial resolution of the probes was better than 20 μm and a time response within 15-20s was achieved. Despite the minute dimensions of the tapered fiber probes the setup developed was relatively robust and compact in construction and performed reliably. It has been successfully employed for the in vivo local determination of pH of mechanically resistant plant tissues of A. thaliana of microscopic scale. The detection of momentary pH gradients across the intact plant seems to be a good tool for the determination of changes in pH in response to experimental treatments affecting for example enzyme activities, availability of mineral nutrients, hormonal control of plant development and plant responses to environmental cues.

[1]  R. Kopelman,et al.  Development of a submicrometer optical fiber oxygen sensor. , 1995, Analytical chemistry.

[2]  David A. Morris,et al.  Auxin inhibits endocytosis and promotes its own efflux from cells , 2005, Nature.

[3]  W. Davies,et al.  Modification of Leaf Apoplastic pH in Relation to Stomatal Sensitivity to Root-Sourced Abscisic Acid Signals1 , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[4]  W. Davies,et al.  Variability among species in the apoplastic pH signalling response to drying soils. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[5]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  Design and Fabrication of Fiber-Optic Nanoprobes for Optical Sensing , 2010, Nanoscale research letters.

[6]  T. Vo‐Dinh,et al.  Single-cell monitoring using fiberoptic nanosensors. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology.

[7]  Julia Cordek,et al.  Direct Immobilization of Glutamate Dehydrogenase on Optical Fiber Probes for Ultrasensitive Glutamate Detection , 1999 .

[8]  L. Meisel,et al.  Auxin transport inhibitors impair vesicle motility and actin cytoskeleton dynamics in diverse eukaryotes , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  F. Skoog,et al.  A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures , 1962 .

[10]  Sergey M Borisov,et al.  Fiber-optic microsensors for simultaneous sensing of oxygen and pH, and of oxygen and temperature. , 2007, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  Aniruddha Ray,et al.  Two-photon nano-PEBBLE sensors: subcellular pH measurements. , 2011, The Analyst.

[12]  O. Wolfbeis,et al.  Long-lifetime based pH micro-optodes without oxygen interference , 1999 .

[13]  Colette McDonagh,et al.  High performance optical ratiometric sol–gel-based pH sensor , 2009 .

[14]  Klaus Danzer,et al.  Analytical Chemistry: Theoretical and Metrological Fundamentals , 2006 .

[15]  F. Baluška,et al.  Neutral red as a probe for confocal laser scanning microscopy studies of plant roots. , 2006, Annals of botany.

[16]  M. Flaishman,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SUBMERGENCE ON ONTOGENY OF CAMBIUM AND SECONDARY XYLEM AND ON FIBER LIGNIFICATION IN INFLORESCENCE STEMS OF ARABIDOPSIS , 2001 .

[17]  T. Martan,et al.  Fiber-optic pH detection in small volumes of biosamples , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[18]  Yasuyuki Nemoto,et al.  Tobacco BY-2 Cell Line as the “HeLa” Cell in the Cell Biology of Higher Plants , 1992 .

[19]  Sarah M. Buck,et al.  Nanoscale probes encapsulated by biologically localized embedding (PEBBLEs) for ion sensing and imaging in live cells. , 2004, Talanta: The International Journal of Pure and Applied Analytical Chemistry.

[20]  Gilberto Brambilla,et al.  Optical fibre nanotaper sensors , 2010 .

[21]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  Fiber-optic nanosensors for single-cell monitoring , 2005, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[22]  R. Kopelman,et al.  Submicrometer intracellular chemical optical fiber sensors. , 1992, Science.

[23]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  Nanosensing at the single cell level. , 2008, Spectrochimica acta. Part B, Atomic spectroscopy.

[24]  R Kopelman,et al.  Development and cellular applications of fiber optic nitric oxide sensors based on a gold-adsorbed fluorophore. , 1998, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  R. Kopelman,et al.  Analytical properties and sensor size effects of a micrometer-sized optical fiber glucose biosensor. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[26]  K. Malínská,et al.  Auxin Transporters Controlling Plant Development , 2011 .

[27]  Tuan Vo-Dinh,et al.  Fabrication of nanodot plasmonic waveguide structures using FIB milling and electron beam-induced deposition. , 2009, Scanning.

[28]  Raoul Kopelman,et al.  Development of submicron chemical fiber optic sensors , 1992 .