Customized Peptide Biomaterial Synthesis via an Environment-Reliant Auto-Programmer Stigmergic Approach

Stigmergy, a form of self-organization, was employed here to engineer a self-organizing peptide capable of forming a nano- or micro-structure and that can potentially be used in various drug delivery and biomedical applications. These self-assembling peptides exhibit several desirable qualities for drug delivery, tissue engineering, cosmetics, antibiotics, food science, and biomedical surface engineering. In this study, peptide biomaterial synthesis was carried out using an environment-reliant auto-programmer stigmergic approach. A model protein, α-gliadin (31, 36, and 38 kD), was forced to attain a primary structure with free –SH groups and broken down enzymatically into smaller fragments using chymotrypsin. This breakdown was carried out at different environment conditions (37 and 50 °C), and the fragments were allowed to self-organize at these temperatures. The new peptides so formed diverged according to the environmental conditions. Interestingly, two peptides (with molecular weights of 13.8 and 11.8 kD) were isolated when the reaction temperature was maintained at 50 °C, while four peptides with molecular weights of 54, 51, 13.8, and 12.8 kD were obtained when the reaction was conducted at 37 °C. Thus, at a higher temperature (50 °C), the peptides formed, compared to the original protein, had lower molecular weights, whereas, at a lower temperature (37 °C), two peptides had higher molecular weights and two had lower molecular weights.

[1]  Francis Heylighen,et al.  Stigmergy as a universal coordination mechanism I: Definition and components , 2016, Cognitive Systems Research.

[2]  Wim E Hennink,et al.  Biomedical Applications of Self-Assembling Peptides. , 2016, Bioconjugate chemistry.

[3]  Jonathan R. Potts,et al.  Stigmergy, collective actions, and animal social spacing , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  S. Hoffmann,et al.  Conformational changes to deamidated wheat gliadins and β-casein upon adsorption to oil–water emulsion interfaces , 2012 .

[5]  V. Isaeva Self-organization in biological systems , 2012, Biology Bulletin.

[6]  Anupama Lakshmanan,et al.  Short self-assembling peptides as building blocks for modern nanodevices. , 2012, Trends in biotechnology.

[7]  Qin Fu,et al.  Preparation of proteins and peptides for mass spectrometry analysis in a bottom-up proteomics workflow. , 2009, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[8]  André Thomas,et al.  The performance of product-driven manufacturing control: An emulation-based benchmarking study , 2009, Comput. Ind..

[9]  S. Stupp,et al.  Self-assembly of giant peptide nanobelts. , 2009, Nano letters.

[10]  B. Berne,et al.  Urea's action on hydrophobic interactions. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[11]  Ruhong Zhou,et al.  Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  F. Moyano,et al.  Polymorphism and partial characterization of digestive enzymes in the spiny lobster Panulirus argus. , 2008, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology.

[13]  J. Lu,et al.  Recent development of peptide self-assembly , 2008 .

[14]  Christian Onof,et al.  Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition , 2008, Cognitive Systems Research.

[15]  H V Parunak,et al.  Expert Assessment of Human-Human Stigmergy , 2005 .

[16]  H. Van Dyke Parunak,et al.  A Survey of Environments and Mechanisms for Human-Human Stigmergy , 2005, E4MAS.

[17]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Editor's Introduction: Stigmergy , 1999, Artificial Life.

[18]  Philip Ball,et al.  The Self-Made Tapestry: Pattern Formation in Nature , 1999 .

[19]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Pitfalls of agent-oriented development , 1998, AGENTS '98.

[20]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Phase-ordering kinetics of cemetery organization in ants , 1998 .

[21]  Anders Wallqvist,et al.  HYDROPHOBIC INTERACTIONS IN AQUEOUS UREA SOLUTIONS WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF PROTEIN DENATURATION , 1998 .

[22]  H. Wieser,et al.  The location of disulphide bonds in α-type gliadins , 1995 .

[23]  E. Méndez,et al.  Characterization of distinct α- and γ-type gliadins and low molecular weight components from wheat endosperm as coeliac immunoreactive proteins , 1995 .

[24]  U. K. Laemmli,et al.  Cleavage of Structural Proteins during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4 , 1970, Nature.

[25]  T. Chardot,et al.  Combining chymotrypsin/trypsin digestion to identify hydrophobic proteins from oil bodies. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[26]  Honggang Cui,et al.  Self‐assembly of peptide amphiphiles: From molecules to nanostructures to biomaterials , 2010, Biopolymers.

[27]  Stefania Bandini,et al.  Environments for Multi-Agent Systems II , 2005, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[28]  Sven A. Brueckner,et al.  RETURN FROM THE ANT SYNTHETIC ECOSYSTEMS FOR MANUFACTURING CONTROL , 2000 .

[29]  E. Méndez,et al.  Characterization of distinct alpha- and gamma-type gliadins and low molecular weight components from wheat endosperm as coeliac immunoreactive proteins. , 1995, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[30]  B. Ásgeirsson,et al.  Structural and kinetic properties of chymotrypsin from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Comparison with bovine chymotrypsin. , 1991, Comparative biochemistry and physiology. B, Comparative biochemistry.

[31]  D. Kasarda,et al.  Secondary structures of wheat α- and ω-gliadin proteins: Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , 1988 .