Value chain analyses of whole crop harvesting to maximise co-generation.

WHOLE CROP harvesting to maximise co-generation requires a substantial change to the sugar value chain and substantial investment. Thus, careful analyses are required. Cogeneration of electricity can be maximised by harvesting the whole crop, i.e. using the additional fibre in tops and trash to fuel cogeneration. However, whole crop harvesting will have impacts on the whole value chain which will be very difficult to predict a priori. We worked with stakeholders in two mill regions to assess, through novel supply chain modelling techniques, the viability of options for co-generation maximisation within locally defined constraints relating to preferences for using existing or installing new power generation capacity. The modelling used agent-based approaches to facilitate integration of existing single-sector models into a whole of value chain framework model. Income from electricity and Renewable Energy Certificates sales was weighed against not only the costs of constructing (for some scenarios) and operating the co-generation facility, but also the costs associated with loss of trash from the field, harvesting the whole crop and transporting it to the mill, separation of trash from cane, and the impact of increased extraneous matter on sugar milling. In general, predictions of the impact of losing trash from the farming system were greater than anticipated, while the impacts in the harvesting and transport sectors were less than expected because of increased efficiency that might be achieved in these sectors. The analysis provided a more complete understanding of the possible impacts of whole crop harvesting than previously available, or than would be obtained using more traditional assessments. The analysis also provided other benefits, such as defining the value of trash and tops and possible improvements in harvesting and transport logistics, which are being used to improve the sugar value chain in the case study regions.

[1]  Peter Hobson,et al.  The Development Of A Prototype Factory-Based Trash Separation Plant , 2002 .

[2]  A. Higgins,et al.  A framework for integrating a complex harvesting and transport system for sugar production , 2004 .

[3]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Value chain research in sugar - : lessons from the past and opportunities for the future , 2006 .

[4]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  Scheduling of road vehicles in sugarcane transport: A case study at an Australian sugar mill , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  Malcolm K. Wegener,et al.  Can Renewable Energy Contribute to a Diversified Future for the Australian Sugar Industry , 2002 .

[6]  B. Milford VALUE CHAINS IN THE AUSTRALIAN SUGAR INDUSTRY: AN ASSESSMENT AND INITIAL STUDY , 2002 .

[7]  B. Keating,et al.  Observations of the harvesting, transporting and trial crushing of sweet sorghum in a sugar mill. , 2004 .

[8]  J. R. Wilson,et al.  New technologies for sugar milling and by-product modification. , 1997 .

[9]  Andrew Higgins,et al.  A simulation model for capacity planning in sugarcane transport , 2005 .

[10]  P. G. Everitt,et al.  Towards an integrated cane transport scheduling system , 1997 .

[11]  P. Thorburn,et al.  Modelling nitrogen dynamics in sugarcane systems: Recent advances and applications , 2005 .

[12]  C. Prahalad,et al.  Competing for the Future , 1994 .

[13]  R. F. Sutherland,et al.  NEW ENERGY OPTIONS IN THE AUSTRALIAN SUGAR INDUSTRY , 2002 .

[14]  D. M. Hogarth,et al.  HARVEST HAUL MODEL—THE COST OF HARVESTING PADDOCKS OF SUGARCANE ACROSS A SUGAR MILLING REGION , 2004 .

[15]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Modelling sugarcane production systems I. Development and performance of the sugarcane module , 1999 .