Automated method to measure trabecular thickness from microcomputed tomographic scans and its application.

Trabeculae form the internal bony mesh work and provide strength to the bone; interconnectivity, overall density, and trabecular thickness are important measures of the integrity of the internal architecture. Such strength is achieved only gradually during ontogeny, whereby an increase in trabecular thickness precedes an increase in mineralization. Loss of bone mass later in life may be compensated for by thickening of the remaining trabeculae. These facts, and the role of trabeculae in mineral homeostasis, highlight the importance of investigating trabecular thickness within and between species. While nondestructive imaging techniques (i.e., muCT and MRI) are becoming increasingly popular, quantification of trabecular thickness using nondestructive techniques has proved difficult owing to limitations imposed by scanning parameters, uniform thresholding, and partial volume averaging. Here we present a computer application, which aims to overcome these problems. Validation is carried out against a phantom and against trabecular thickness measured in corresponding histological sections. Good agreement was found between these measurements. Furthermore, when trabecular thickness is recorded for modern human fetal ilia, a trend toward trabecular thickness increase is found and is in line with reports of ontogenetic morphometric changes using histological sections. However, there are discrepancies. These may in part be due to partial volume effects of obliquely oriented structures. More crucial, however, are problems inherent in histological sections, e.g., shrinkage and distortion, especially where differences in mineralization are concerned; this may affect biological interpretations.

[1]  A A Biewener,et al.  Adaptive changes in trabecular architecture in relation to functional strain patterns and disuse. , 1996, Bone.

[2]  W. Kalender,et al.  Accuracy limits for the determination of cortical width and density: the influence of object size and CT imaging parameters. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Resolution dependency of microstructural properties of cancellous bone based on three-dimensional mu-tomography. , 1996, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[4]  F. Zonneveld,et al.  Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed tomography: applications and problems. , 1993, American journal of physical anthropology.

[5]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Angular orientation of trabecular bone in the femoral head and its relationship to hip joint loads in leaping primates , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[6]  T. Ryan,et al.  The three-dimensional structure of trabecular bone in the femoral head of strepsirrhine primates. , 2002, Journal of human evolution.

[7]  H. Frost On the Trabecular “Thickness”‐Number Problem , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. , 1983, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[9]  Zbisław Tabor,et al.  Estimating structural properties of trabecular bone from gray-level low-resolution images. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  F. Glorieux,et al.  Human fetal bone development: histomorphometric evaluation of the proximal femoral metaphysis. , 2002, Bone.

[11]  R. Recker,et al.  Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women with parathyroid hormone 1-84 for 18 months increases cancellous bone formation and improves cancellous architecture: a study of iliac crest biopsies using histomorphometry and micro computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[12]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  Architecture and mineralization of developing cortical and trabecular bone of the mandible , 2005, Anatomy and Embryology.

[13]  R. Müller,et al.  Age-related changes in trabecular bone microstructures: global and local morphometry , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[14]  S Prohaska,et al.  Stereological measures of trabecular bone structure: comparison of 3D micro computed tomography with 2D histological sections in human proximal tibial bone biopsies , 2005, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The influence of microcomputed tomography threshold variations on the assessment of structural and mechanical trabecular bone properties. , 2002, Bone.

[16]  A. Koivisto,et al.  Bone structure and volumetric density in young adults born prematurely: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study. , 2005, Bone.

[17]  Daniel Chappard,et al.  Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs is correlated with bone histomorphometry , 2004, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[18]  I. Marić,et al.  Age- and Region-Dependent Changes in Human Lumbar Vertebral Bone: A Histomorphometric Study , 2004, Spine.

[19]  G. Macho,et al.  Age changes in bone microstructure: do they occur uniformly? , 2005 .

[20]  A. Freemont,et al.  Age related histomorphometric changes in bone in normal British men and women. , 1994, Journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  J. R. Bowen,et al.  Normative data for iliac bone histomorphometry in growing children. , 1992, Bone.

[22]  R Seliktar,et al.  Comparison of the trabecular architecture and the isostatic stress flow in the human calcaneus. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Static histomorphometry of human iliac crest and vertebral trabecular bone: a comparative study. , 2002, Bone.

[24]  S. Swartz,et al.  Theoretical and empirical scaling patterns and topological homology in bone trabeculae. , 1998, The Journal of experimental biology.

[25]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. , 1999, Bone.

[26]  I. Hvid,et al.  Quantification of age-related changes in the structure model type and trabecular thickness of human tibial cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[27]  P. Meunier,et al.  Age-related changes in cancellous bone structure. A two-dimensional study in the transiliac and iliac crest biopsy sites. , 1988, Bone and mineral.

[28]  M Ding,et al.  Accuracy of cancellous bone volume fraction measured by micro-CT scanning. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  M. Grynpas,et al.  Patient-specific microarchitecture of vertebral cancellous bone: a peripheral quantitative computed tomographic and histological study. , 2002, Bone.

[30]  J. T. Bryant,et al.  Three-dimensional computational reconstruction of mixed anatomical tissues following histological preparation. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[31]  R Huiskes,et al.  Osteocyte density and histomorphometric parameters in cancellous bone of the proximal femur in five mammalian species , 1996, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[32]  H. Kreipe,et al.  Diagnosis and quantification of bone marrow fibrosis are significantly biased by the pre‐staining processing of bone marrow biopsies , 2006, Histopathology.

[33]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  Architecture and mineralization of developing trabecular bone in the pig mandibular condyle. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[34]  H. Takahashi,et al.  A Morphometric Comparison of Trabecular Structure of Human Ilium Between Microcomputed Tomography and Conventional Histomorphometry , 1997, Calcified Tissue International.

[35]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Volumetric spatial decomposition of trabecular bone into rods and plates--a new method for local bone morphometry. , 2006, Bone.

[36]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Impact of spatial resolution on the prediction of trabecular architecture parameters. , 1998, Bone.

[37]  F Peyrin,et al.  Microarchitectural and Physical Changes During Fetal Growth in Human Vertebral Bone , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[38]  H. Genant,et al.  Accuracy of CT-based thickness measurement of thin structures: modeling of limited spatial resolution in all three dimensions. , 2002, Medical physics.

[39]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures , 1985, Calcified Tissue International.

[40]  Z. Ráliš,et al.  Changes in dimensions of large cancellous bone specimens during histological preparation as measured on slabs from human femoral heads , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[41]  Jesper Skovhus Thomsen,et al.  Zone-dependent changes in human vertebral trabecular bone: clinical implications. , 2002, Bone.

[42]  T. Ryan,et al.  Femoral head trabecular bone structure in two omomyid primates. , 2002, Journal of human evolution.

[43]  Peter Dangerfield,et al.  Developmental Juvenile Osteology. By LOUISE SCHEUER and SUE BLACK. (Pp. x+587; fully illustrated; $159 hardback; ISBN 0 12 624000 0.) San Diego: Academic Press. 2000 , 2001 .

[44]  R Müller,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of nonhuman primate trabecular architecture using micro-computed tomography. , 2001, American journal of physical anthropology.

[45]  David P Fyhrie,et al.  The effect of microcomputed tomography scanning and reconstruction voxel size on the accuracy of stereological measurements in human cancellous bone. , 2004, Bone.