Force track analysis of contemporary hip simulators.

In an earlier paper, the authors presented the first verified method of computation of slide tracks in the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup of total hip prostheses. The method was applied for gait and for two hip simulator designs, and in a subsequent paper, for another eight designs. In the present paper, the track drawn by the resultant contact force, the so-called force track, was studied in depth. The variations of sliding distance, sliding velocity and direction of sliding during a cycle, all of which are important with respect to wear, were computed for gait and for 11 hip simulator designs. Moreover, the product of the instantaneous load and increment of sliding distance was numerically integrated over a cycle. This integral makes it possible to compare clinical wear rates with those produced by hip simulators in terms of a wear factor. For the majority of contemporary hip simulators, the integral has so far been unknown. The computations revealed considerable differences, which are likely to explain the substantial differences in wear produced by the simulators. With the most common head diameter, 28 mm, the ranges for sliding distance per cycle, mean sliding velocity, total change of direction of sliding and integral were: 19.7-34.3 mm, 19.7-49.0 mm/s, 360-1513 degrees, and 17.4-43.5 Nm, respectively.

[1]  Max Schaldach,et al.  Engineering in Medicine , 1975 .

[2]  Duncan Dowson,et al.  Laboratory wear tests and clinical observations of the penetration of femoral heads into acetabular cups in total replacement hip joints , 1985 .

[3]  Olof Calonius,et al.  Slide track analysis of the relative motion between femoral head and acetabular cup in walking and in hip simulators. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  H. McKellop,et al.  Degradation and Wear of Ultra-High-Molecular-Weight Polyethylene , 1985 .

[5]  C. Bragdon,et al.  The Importance of Multidirectional Motion on the Wear of Polyethylene , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[6]  D Dowson,et al.  Design and development of a versatile hip joint simulator and a preliminary assessment of wear and creep in Charnley total replacement hip joints. , 1988, Engineering in medicine.

[7]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  A. Wang,et al.  The significance of nonlinear motion in the wear screening of orthopaedic implant materials , 1997 .

[9]  Olof Calonius,et al.  Slide track analysis of eight contemporary hip simulator designs. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  D Dowson,et al.  A multi-station hip joint simulator study of the performance of 22 mm diameter zirconia-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene total replacement hip joints , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[11]  A Unsworth,et al.  A five-station hip joint simulator , 2001, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  J Fisher,et al.  A hip joint simulator study using simplified loading and motion cycles generating physiological wear paths and rates , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[13]  G. Smidt,et al.  Measurement of hip-joint motion during walking. Evaluation of an electrogoniometric method. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  V O Saikko,et al.  A Three-Axis Hip Joint Simulator for Wear and Friction Studies on Total Hip Prostheses , 1996, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  V. Saikko,et al.  Type of motion and lubricant in wear simulation of polyethylene acetabular cup , 1999, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.