Experimental and Self‐Reported Measures of Risk Taking and Digit Ratio (2d:4d): Evidence from a Large, Systematic Study

Using a large (n=704) sample of laboratory subjects, we systematically investigate the links between the digit ratio - a biomarker for pre-natal testosterone exposure - and two measures of individual risk taking: (i) risk preferences over lotteries with real monetary incentives, and (ii) self-reported risk attitude. The digit ratio (also called 2D:4D) is the ratio of the length of the index finger to the length of the ring finger, and we consider both hands’ digit ratios. Previous studies have found that the digit ratio correlates with risk taking in some subject samples, but not others. In our sample, we find that both the right-hand and the left-hand digit ratio are significantly associated with risk preferences: subjects with lower digit ratios tend to choose riskier lotteries. Neither digit ratio, however, is associated with self-reported risk attitude.

[1]  C. Bonferroni.  Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste , 1935 .

[2]  Gary L. Grahn.  NBD Model of Repeat-Purchase Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation , 1969 .

[3]  D N Jackson,et al.  A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking. , 1972, Journal of personality.

[4]  Ben M. Enis,et al.  Students as Subjects in Consumer Behavior Experiments , 1972 .

[5]  S. Holm.  A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[6]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[7]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses: An Expected Utility Analysis , 1980 .

[8]  H. P. Binswanger.  Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural india , 1980 .

[9]  H. P. Binswanger.  Attitudes toward Risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India , 1981 .

[10]  A. Arnold,et al.  Organizational and activational effects of sex steroids on brain and behavior: A reanalysis , 1985, Hormones and Behavior.

[11]  W. Collins,et al.  Testosterone levels in midtrimester maternal and fetal plasma and amniotic fluid , 1985, Prenatal diagnosis.

[12]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[13]  G. Hommel.  A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test , 1988 .

[14]  J. K. Finegan,et al.  A window for the study of prenatal sex hormone influences on postnatal development. , 1989, The Journal of genetic psychology.

[15]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  Risk within reason. , 1990, Science.

[16]  Kenneth R. MacCrimmon,et al.  Characteristics of risk taking executives , 1990 .

[17]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[18]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Utility Functions That Depend on Health Status: Estimates and Economic Implications , 1990 .

[19]  E. Miller.  Prenatal sex hormone transfer: A reason to study opposite-sex twins , 1994 .

[20]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Statistical Bias Functions and Informative Hypothetical Surveys , 1994 .

[21]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible? , 1995 .

[22]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[23]  J. Potters,et al.  An experiment on risk taking and evaluation periods , 1997 .

[24]  G. Loewenstein.  Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[25]  M. Johannesson,et al.  Characterizing QALYs by Risk Neutrality , 1997 .

[26]  R. G. Cummings,et al.  Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible? , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[27]  S. Paradiso.  The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life , 1998 .

[28]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. , 1999 .

[29]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits , 2000 .

[30]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[31]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  J. Swaddle,et al.  Digit Ratio: A Pointer to Fertility, Behavior, and Health , 2002, Heredity.

[33]  S. M. Breedlove,et al.  Masculinized Finger Length Patterns in Human Males and Females with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia , 2002, Hormones and Behavior.

[34]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects , 2002 .

[35]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Attitude Scale: Measuring Risk Perceptions and Risk Behaviors , 2002 .

[36]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Sex Differences and Statistical Stereotyping in Attitudes Toward Financial Risk , 2002 .

[37]  Gary Charness,et al.  Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An Experiment , 2003 .

[38]  B. Fink,et al.  Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Rebecca C. Knickmeyer,et al.  2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. , 2004, Early human development.

[40]  Christian Thöni,et al.  Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence , 2004 .

[41]  S. Frederick.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[42]  D. Lieberman,et al.  The development of sex differences in digital formula from infancy in the Fels Longitudinal Study , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[43]  J. Ioannidis.  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[44]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects: New Data without Order Effects , 2005 .

[45]  R. Gitau,et al.  Fetal plasma testosterone correlates positively with cortisol , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[46]  G. Harrison.  Hypothetical Bias Over Uncertain Outcomes , 2005 .

[47]  E. Weber,et al.  A Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) Scale for Adult Populations , 2006, Judgment and Decision Making.

[48]  John Manning,et al.  A longitudinal study of digit ratio (2D:4D) and other finger ratios in Jamaican children , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[49]  P. Vernon,et al.  Finger-length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone-transfer between opposite-sex twins , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[50]  M. Hines.  Prenatal testosterone and gender-related behaviour. , 2006, European journal of endocrinology.

[51]  K. Desdicioglu,et al.  Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). , 2006, Early human development.

[52]  J. Archer.  Testosterone and human aggression: an evaluation of the challenge hypothesis , 2006, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[53]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Second to fourth digit length ratio (2D:4D) and adult sex hormone levels: New data and a meta-analytic review , 2007, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[54]  A. Campbell,et al.  Sporting achievement: what is the contribution of digit ratio? , 2007, Journal of personality.

[55]  A. Falk,et al.  Are Risk Aversion and Impatience Related to Cognitive Ability? , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[56]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[57]  L. Prosser,et al.  Do Risk Attitudes Differ across Domains and Respondent Types? , 2007, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[58]  Colin Camerer,et al.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[59]  J. Herbert,et al.  Endogenous steroids and financial risk taking on a London trading floor , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  C. Apicella,et al.  Testosterone and financial risk preferences , 2008 .

[61]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Men, Women and Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence , 2008 .

[62]  A. Falk,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences , 2009 .

[63]  Soo Hong Chew,et al.  The Heritability of Attitude Toward Economic Risk , 2009, Twin Research and Human Genetics.

[64]  L. Kršková,et al.  Testosterone enhancement during pregnancy influences the 2D:4D ratio and open field motor activity of rat siblings in adulthood , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[65]  S. Moffat,et al.  Fingers as a marker of prenatal androgen exposure. , 2009, Endocrinology.

[66]  Benjamin C. Campbell,et al.  The 7R polymorphism in the dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) is associated with financial risk taking in men , 2009 .

[67]  M. Johannesson,et al.  A randomized trial of the effect of estrogen and testosterone on economic behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[68]  Burkhard C. Schipper,et al.  The Visible Hand: Finger ratio (2D:4D) and competitive behavior , 2009 .

[69]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Gender Differences in Preferences , 2009 .

[71]  Paola Sapienza,et al.  Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[72]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Genetic Determinants of Financial Risk Taking , 2009, PloS one.

[73]  S. Donn.  Second-to-fourth digit ratio predicts success among high-frequency financial traders , 2009 .

[74]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking , 2009 .

[75]  A. Falk,et al.  Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences , 2009 .

[76]  A. Arnold.  The organizational–activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues , 2009, Hormones and Behavior.

[77]  Richard Ronay,et al.  Power, Testosterone, and Risk-Taking , 2010 .

[78]  A. Schwerdtfeger,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) is associated with traffic violations for male frequent car drivers. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[79]  Johannes Hönekopp,et al.  Meta‐analysis of digit ratio 2D:4D shows greater sex difference in the right hand , 2010, American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council.

[80]  Chetan Dave,et al.  Eliciting risk preferences: When is simple better? , 2008 .

[81]  Mark Gurnell,et al.  From molecule to market: steroid hormones and financial risk-taking , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[82]  S. Van Dongen,et al.  Sexual Dimorphism in the Prenatal Digit Ratio (2D:4D) , 2009, Archives of sexual behavior.

[83]  Gad Saad,et al.  Testosterone and domain-specific risk: Digit ratios (2D:4D and rel2) as predictors of recreational, financial, and social risk-taking behaviors , 2011 .

[84]  Burkhard C. Schipper,et al.  The visible hand: finger ratio (2D:4D) and competitive bidding , 2011, Experimental Economics.

[85]  Justin R. Sydnor,et al.  Digit ratios (2D:4D) as predictors of risky decision making for both sexes , 2011 .

[86]  M. Cohn,et al.  Developmental basis of sexually dimorphic digit ratios , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[87]  Johannes Hönekopp.  Relationships between digit ratio 2D:4D and self-reported aggression and risk taking in an online study , 2011 .

[88]  Aldo Rustichini,et al.  Organizing Effects of Testosterone and Economic Behavior: Not Just Risk Taking , 2011, PloS one.

[89]  R. Nayga,et al.  Do risk and time preferences have biological roots , 2014 .

[90]  R. Bergès,et al.  Environmental levels of oestrogenic and antiandrogenic compounds feminize digit ratios in male rats and their unexposed male progeny , 2013, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[91]  T. Ventura,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) in newborns: influences of prenatal testosterone and maternal environment. , 2013, Early human development.

[92]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Experimental subjects are not different , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[93]  Alex Imas,et al.  Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences , 2013 .

[94]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  WHO IS 'BEHAVIORAL'? COGNITIVE ABILITY AND ANOMALOUS PREFERENCES. , 2013, Journal of the European Economic Association.

[95]  R. Trivers,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) in Klinefelter's syndrome , 2013, Andrology.

[96]  Pablo Brañas-Garza,et al.  Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio Has a Non-Monotonic Impact on Altruism , 2013, PloS one.

[97]  R. Trivers,et al.  Digit Ratio (2D:4D) and Gender Inequalities Across Nations , 2014, Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior.

[98]  G. Loomes,et al.  Measuring Individual Risk Attitudes When Preferences are Imprecise , 2014 .

[99]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  P-Curve: A Key to the File Drawer , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[100]  Diego Aycinena,et al.  Risk Preferences and Prenatal Exposure to Sex Hormones for Ladinos , 2014, PloS one.

[101]  A. Espín,et al.  Can exposure to prenatal sex hormones (2D:4D) predict cognitive reflection? , 2014, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[102]  C. Apicella,et al.  Testosterone and Economic Risk Taking: A Review , 2015 .

[103]  Burkhard C. Schipper.  Sex Hormones and Competitive Bidding , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[104]  M. Hines,et al.  Early androgen exposure and human gender development , 2015, Biology of Sex Differences.

[105]  Roderick E. White,et al.  The Fetal Origins Hypothesis in Finance: Prenatal Environment, the Gender Gap, and Investor Behavior* , 2015 .

[106]  C. Cook,et al.  Digit ratio (2D:4D) and salivary testosterone, oestradiol and cortisol levels under challenge: Evidence for prenatal effects on adult endocrine responses. , 2015, Early human development.

[107]  Tae Beom Kim,et al.  Does the Mother or Father Determine the Offspring Sex Ratio? Investigating the Relationship between Maternal Digit Ratio and Offspring Sex Ratio , 2015, PloS one.

[108]  Soham Saha,et al.  Sexual dimorphism in the hypophysiotropic tyrosine hydroxylase-positive neurons in the preoptic area of the teleost, Clarias batrachus , 2015, Biology of Sex Differences.

[109]  Paolo Crosetto,et al.  A theoretical and experimental appraisal of four risk elicitation methods , 2013 .

[110]  Paolo Crosetto,et al.  A Reconsideration of Gender Differences in Risk Attitudes , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[111]  M. Miraldo,et al.  In sickness but not in wealth: field evidence on patients’ risk preferences in the financial and health domain , 2016 .

[112]  Steven J. Bosworth,et al.  Overconfidence, Incentives and Digit Ratio , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[113]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[114]  Sara R. Machado,et al.  Temporal Stability, Cross-Validity, and External Validity of Risk Preferences Measures: Experimental Evidence from a UK Representative Sample , 2016 .

[115]  M. Miraldo,et al.  In Sickness but Not in Wealth , 2016, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[116]  Jan Duchoslav.  Prenatal Temperature Shocks Reduce Cooperation: Evidence from Public Goods Games in Uganda , 2017, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[117]  P. Dalton,et al.  Self-confidence, Overconfidence and Prenatal Testosterone Exposure: Evidence from the Lab , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..