Practical Epistemic Cognition in a Design Project—Engineering Students Developing Epistemic Fluency

Contribution: This paper reports engineering students ’ practical epistemic cognition by studying their interactional work in situ. Studying “epistemologies in action” the study breaks away from mainstream approaches that describe this in terms of beliefs or of stage theories. Background: In epistemology, knowledge is traditionally seen as “justified true belief,” neglecting knowledge related to action. Interest has increased in studying the epistemologies people use in situated action, and their development of epistemic fluency. How appropriate such approaches are in engineering and design education need further investigation. Research Questions: 1) How do students in the context of a design project use epistemic tools in their interactional work? and 2) What are the implications of the findings in terms of how students’ cognitive and epistemological development could be conceptualized? Methodology: A collaborative group of six students were video recorded on the 14th day of a fifth-semester design project, as they were preparing for a formal critique session. The entire, almost 6 h, session was recorded by four video cameras mounted in the design studio, with an additional fifth body-mounted camera. The video data collected was analyzed using video ethnographic, conversation analysis, and embodied interaction analysis methods. Findings: The results show that the students use a wealth of bodily material resources as an integral and seamless part of their interactions as epistemic tools, in their joint production of understanding and imagining. The analysis also suggests that students’ epistemological and cognitive development, individually and as a group, should be understood in terms of developing “epistemic fluency.”

[1]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Collaborative design decision-making as social process , 2019 .

[2]  J. S. Philipsen,et al.  Co-Operative Action , 2018, Journal of Pragmatics.

[3]  J. O'Reilly,et al.  Theory, practice and interiority: an extended epistemology for engineering education , 2018, European Journal of Engineering Education.

[4]  Vivek Kant,et al.  Taking Stock of Engineering Epistemology: Multidisciplinary Perspectives , 2018, Philosophy & Technology.

[5]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Design science research – a powerful tool for improving methods in engineering education research , 2018, European Journal of Engineering Education.

[6]  K. Littleton,et al.  Socialising Epistemic Cognition , 2017 .

[7]  C. Cunningham,et al.  Epistemic Practices of Engineering for Education. , 2017 .

[8]  Nicky Wolmarans,et al.  Inferential reasoning in design: Relations between material product and specialised disciplinary knowledge , 2016 .

[9]  Thomas Ryberg,et al.  Problem and Project Based Learning in Hybrid Spaces , 2016, Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning.

[10]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Epistemic cognition in science , 2016 .

[11]  G. J. Kelly,et al.  Methodological considerations for the study of epistemic cognition in practice , 2016 .

[12]  Ronald W. Rinehart,et al.  Epistemic Cognition and Philosophy: Developing a New Framework for Epistemic Cognition , 2016 .

[13]  Wendelin Küpers,et al.  Phronesis as Professional Knowledge: Practical Wisdom in the Professions , 2013 .

[14]  G. Stahl Theories of Cognition in Collaborative Learning , 2013 .

[15]  Luke A. Buckland,et al.  Expanding the Dimensions of Epistemic Cognition: Arguments From Philosophy and Psychology , 2011 .

[16]  J. Dewey The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology , 2011 .

[17]  C. Peirce How to Make Our Ideas Clear , 2011, The Nature of Truth.

[18]  Sven Bernecker,et al.  Routledge Companion to Epistemology , 2011 .

[19]  M. Hess Is Truth the Primary Epistemic Goal , 2010 .

[20]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Student learning in an electric circuit theory course: critical aspects and task design , 2009 .

[21]  J. Whyte,et al.  Knowledge Practices in Design: The Role of Visual Representations as `Epistemic Objects' , 2009 .

[22]  O. Braddick,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 2008 .

[23]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Humans, Intentionality, Experience And Tools For Learning: Some Contributions From Post‐cognitive Theories To The Use Of Technology In Physics Education , 2007 .

[24]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners , 2007 .

[25]  Keith M. Murphy,et al.  Collaborative imagining: The interactive use of gestures, talk, and graphic representation in architectural practice , 2005 .

[26]  Geraldine McDonald,et al.  Artifacts, Tools, and Classrooms , 2005 .

[27]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  What you should know to survive in knowledge societies: On a semiotic understanding of ‘knowledge’ , 2005 .

[28]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  P. Wickman The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work , 2004 .

[30]  M. Schommer-Aikins Explaining the Epistemological Belief System: Introducing the Embedded Systemic Model and Coordinated Research Approach , 2004 .

[31]  Per Linell,et al.  Moving in and out of framings: activity contexts in talks with young unemployed people within a training project☆ , 2003 .

[32]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Tapping Epistemological Resources for Learning Physics , 2003 .

[33]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Artifact Mediation in Dewey and in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory , 2001 .

[34]  Thomas A. Litzinger,et al.  The Effects of a First‐Year Engineering Design Course on Student Intellectual Development as Measured by the Perry Scheme , 2000 .

[35]  S. Leigland Pragmatism, Science, And Society: A Review Of Richard Rorty's Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth: Philosophical Papers, Volume 1. , 1999, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[36]  Cynthia J. Atman,et al.  A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes , 1999 .

[37]  Paul ten Have,et al.  Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide , 1999 .

[38]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  On Line and On Paper: Visual Representations, Visual Culture, and Computer Graphics in Design Engineering , 1998 .

[39]  W. Frawley Mind as Action , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications , 1998 .

[41]  H. Simon,et al.  The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[42]  M. Pavelich,et al.  Measuring the Effect of Experiential Education Using the Perry Model , 1996 .

[43]  C. Mitcham,et al.  Thinking through Technology: The Path between Engineering and Philosophy by Carl Mitcham (review) , 1995, Technology and Culture.

[44]  R. Rorty Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Frontmatter , 1990 .

[45]  Marlene Schommer Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. , 1990 .

[46]  R. Bogumil The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[47]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[48]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[49]  Edwin T. Layton,et al.  American Ideologies of Science and Engineering , 1976 .

[50]  W. G. Perry Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development in the College Years: A Scheme. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1970 .

[51]  Henryk Skolimowski,et al.  The Structure of Thinking in Technology , 1966 .

[52]  J. Dewey,et al.  How we think : a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process , 1934 .

[53]  Shannon M. Chance,et al.  Using Architecture Design Studio Pedagogies to Enhance Engineering Education , 2016 .

[54]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  The Group as Paradigmatic Unit of Analysis: The Contested Relationship of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to the Learning Sciences , 2016 .

[55]  Christelle Didier,et al.  Engineering education research as engineering research , 2015 .

[56]  P. Goodyear,et al.  Epistemic fluency and professional education innovation , knowledgeable action and actionable knowledge , 2015 .

[57]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Analysing and modelling engineering students’ learning in the laboratory : A comparison of two methodologies , 2015 .

[58]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  A tool to see with or just something to manipulate? Investigating engineering students' use of oscilloscopes in the laboratory , 2015 .

[59]  P. Kroes,et al.  Extending the Scope of the Theory of Knowledge , 2013 .

[60]  Anna-Karin Carstensen,et al.  Connect : Modelling Learning to Facilitate Linking Models and the Real World trough Lab-Work in Electric Circuit Courses for Engineering Students , 2013 .

[61]  Jonte Bernhard,et al.  Make Links : Overcoming the Threshold and Entering the Portal of Understanding , 2012 .

[62]  Scott P. McDonald,et al.  Science learning and epistemology , 2012 .

[63]  P. Pescarmona,et al.  Science & Technology , 2012 .

[64]  Mieke Boon,et al.  Models as Epistemic Tools in Engineering Sciences , 2009 .

[65]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning , 2009 .

[66]  Robin Adams,et al.  Students with differing design processes as freshmen: case studies on change , 2008 .

[67]  Roger Malmberg,et al.  Analog Circuit Topology Development: Practice methods for technology and teaching based on comprehensible transistor models , 2007 .

[68]  P. Have Doing conversation analysis , 2007 .

[69]  Charles L. Owen,et al.  Design Thinking: Notes on Its Nature and Use , 2006 .

[70]  Lars Bo Henriksen,et al.  Engineers and Bildung , 2006 .

[71]  S. Todd Stubbs,et al.  Design Drawing in Instructional Design at Brigham Young University's Center for Instructional Design: A Case Study , 2006 .

[72]  Alva Noë,et al.  Action in Perception , 2006, Representation and Mind.

[73]  Michael Kompf,et al.  We have met technology and it is us , 2005 .

[74]  Margot Brereton,et al.  Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between abstract and material representations , 2004 .

[75]  Anette Kolmos,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning , 2003 .

[76]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Design Knowing & Learning: A Socially Mediated Activity , 2001 .

[77]  William G. Perry,et al.  Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years , 1999 .

[78]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Do interviews really assess students’ knowledge? , 1998 .

[79]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Pointing as Situated Practice , 1998 .

[80]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[81]  José Antonio Méndez Sanz,et al.  Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy , 1995 .

[82]  A. Collins,et al.  Epistemic Fluency and Constructivist Learning Environments. , 1995 .

[83]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[84]  Joseph Dunne,et al.  Back to the rough ground : 'phronesis' and 'techne' in modern philosophy and in Aristotle , 1993 .

[85]  A. E. Samuel,et al.  The acquisition of wisdom in engineering design , 1991 .

[86]  A. Costall,et al.  Introduction: In place of cognitivism , 1987 .

[87]  Donald A. Schön Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[88]  J. Dewey Logic, the theory of inquiry , 1938 .

[89]  Lennette Kipper Experience and Nature , 1930, Nature.

[90]  E. Graaff,et al.  Characteristics of Problem-Based Learning * , 2022 .