Inter-institutional Social Capital for Self-Organising 'Nested Enterprises'

A self-governing institution designed according to Ostrom's principles provides a way for its members to self-organise the management and sustainability of common-pool resources. Such institutions have been studied as a form of social capital, used as an input to a decision-making framework for coordination in various collective action situations. It has been shown that formally representing and reasoning with (electronic) social capital can reduce the complexity of decision-making, enhance participation and improve outcomes of collective action. However, it was assumed that these institutions were essentially independent, and so the members were limited in their ability to fully exploit their social capital across different collective actions situations because they did no learning. Therefore, in this paper we examine the role and nature of social capital with learning agents in the context of Ostrom's institutional design principle regarding structural self-organisation, specifically in the form of multiple layers of nested enterprises. Both inter-agent and inter-institutional interactions are then situated in a Public Goods Game, typically used to study the effects of free-riding which diminishes the positive benefits of cooperation in otherwise unregulated situations. Our experimental results demonstrate that the Social Capital created both within and between the institutions beneficially affects the development of a bottom-up structure of nested enterprises.

[1]  Lester C. Thurow,et al.  INVESTMENT IN HUMAN CAPITAL , 2016 .

[2]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  Ada Diaconescu,et al.  On the Minimal Recognition of Rights in Holonic Institutions , 2016, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[4]  L. Lachmann,et al.  Capital and its structure , 1956 .

[5]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Experiments with Social Capital in Multi-agent Systems , 2014, PRIMA.

[6]  L. Hooghe,et al.  Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[7]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Trust and relational capital , 2011, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[8]  Jaime Simão Sichman,et al.  An Empirical Approach for Relating Environmental Patterns with Agent Team Compositions , 2016, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[9]  Pablo Noriega,et al.  Implementing norms in electronic institutions , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[10]  Ada Diaconescu,et al.  Holonic Institutions for Multi-scale Polycentric Self-governance , 2014, COIN@AAMAS/PRICAI.

[11]  E. Shils The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[12]  Bernhard E. Boser,et al.  A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers , 1992, COLT '92.

[13]  Rino Falcone,et al.  Trust and relational capital , 2011, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[14]  Olivier Boissier,et al.  Developing organised multiagent systems using the MOISE+ model: programming issues at the system and agent levels , 2007, Int. J. Agent Oriented Softw. Eng..

[15]  Frank Dignum,et al.  A logic of agent organizations , 2012, Log. J. IGPL.

[16]  Jeff Heaton,et al.  Encog: library of interchangeable machine learning models for Java and C# , 2015, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[17]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  Collective Intelligence and Algorithmic Governance of Socio-Technical Systems , 2014 .

[18]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Governing the commons , 1990 .

[19]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Foundations of Social Capital , 2003 .

[20]  Alun D. Preece,et al.  Agent-based virtual organisations for the Grid , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[21]  Alexander Artikis,et al.  Axiomatization of Socio-Economic Principles for Self-Organizing Institutions: Concepts, Experiments and Challenges , 2012, TAAS.

[22]  F. Scharpf Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centered Institutionalism In Policy Research , 1997 .

[23]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  A Generic Social Capital Framework for Optimising Self-Organised Collective Action , 2015, 2015 IEEE 9th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems.

[24]  Scott A. DeLoach,et al.  Omacs: A Framework for Adaptive, Complex Systems , 2009, Handbook of Research on Multi-Agent Systems.

[25]  Simon Gaechter,et al.  Conditional cooperation: Behavioral regularities from the lab and the field and their policy implications , 2006 .

[26]  Ronald J. Oakerson,et al.  분권화 시대의 대도시 거버넌스 = Governing local public economies : creating the civic metropolis , 1999 .

[27]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[28]  Andrzej Nowak,et al.  The Reinvention of Social Capital for Socio-Technical Systems [Special Section Introduction] , 2014, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[29]  G. Psacharopoulos,et al.  Investment in Human Capital. , 1972 .

[30]  Dídac Busquets,et al.  System modeling: Principled operationalization of social systems using Presage2 , 2014, Modeling and Simulation-Based Systems Engineering Handbook.

[31]  Marina De Vos,et al.  Specifying and Reasoning About Multiple Institutions , 2006, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.