Fine Scale Patterns in Microbial Extracellular Enzyme Activity during Leaf Litter Decomposition in a Stream and its Floodplain

Microorganisms mediate the decomposition of leaf-litter through the release of extracellular enzymes. The surfaces of decomposing leaves are both chemically and physically heterogeneous, and spatial patterns in microbial enzyme activity on the litter surface should provide insights into fine-scale patterns of leaf-litter decomposition. Platanus occidentalis leaves were collected from the floodplain of a third-order stream in northern Mississippi, enclosed in individual litter bags, and placed in the stream channel and in the floodplain. Replicate leaves were collected approximately monthly over a 9-month period and assayed for spatial variation in microbial extracellular enzyme activity and rates of organic matter (OM) decomposition. Spatial variation in enzyme activity was measured by sampling 96 small discs (5-mm diameter) cut from each leaf. Discs were assayed for the activity of enzymes involved in lignin (oxidative enzymes) and cellulose (β-glucosidase, cellobiohydrolase) degradation. Rates of OM loss were greater in the stream than the floodplain. Activities of all enzymes displayed high variability in both environments, with severalfold differences across individual leaves, and replicate leaves varied greatly in their distribution of activities. Geostatistical analysis revealed no clear patterns in spatial distribution of activity over time or among replicates, and replicate leaves were highly variable. These results show that fine-scale spatial heterogeneity occurs on decomposing leaves, but the level of spatial variability varies among individual leaves at the measured spatial scales. This study is the first to use geostatistical analyses to analyze landscape patterns of microbial activity on decomposing leaf litter and in conjunction with studies of the microbial community composition and/or substrate characteristics, should provide key insights into the function of these processes.

[1]  R. Chróst.  Microbial Ectoenzymes in Aquatic Environments , 1990 .

[2]  R. Wetzel.  Extracellular Enzymatic Interactions: Storage, Redistribution, and Interspecific Communication , 1991 .

[3]  G. Minshall,et al.  INTERBIOME COMPARISON OF STREAM ECOSYSTEM DYNAMICS , 1983 .

[4]  Z. Cardon,et al.  Decomposition dynamics in mixed‐species leaf litter , 2004 .

[5]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  An enzymic approach to the analysis of microbial activity during plant litter decomposition , 1991 .

[6]  M. Gessner,et al.  Influence of conidial traits and leaf structure on attachment success of aquatic hyphomycetes on leaf litter. , 2007, Mycologia.

[7]  R. Franklin,et al.  Multi-scale variation in spatial heterogeneity for microbial community structure in an eastern Virginia agricultural field. , 2003, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[8]  J. Webster,et al.  The role of floods in particulate organic matter dynamics of a southern Appalachian river–floodplain ecosystem , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[9]  T. Osono.  Colonization and succession of fungi during decomposition of Swida controversa leaf litter. , 2005, Mycologia.

[10]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Microbial enzyme activities as indicators of organic matter processing rates in a Lake Erie coastal wetland , 1995 .

[11]  R. Chróst,et al.  Aquatic microbial ecology : biochemical and molecular approaches , 1990 .

[12]  J. Bouma,et al.  Future Directions of Precision Agriculture , 2005, Precision Agriculture.

[13]  R. Franklin,et al.  A geostatistical analysis of small-scale spatial variability in bacterial abundance and community structure in salt marsh creek bank sediments. , 2002, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[14]  B. Malmqvist,et al.  Mitigation or disturbance? Effects of liming on macroinvertebrate assemblage structure and leaf-litter decomposition in the humic streams of northern Sweden , 2006 .

[15]  T. Royer,et al.  Diversity of Fungi, Bacteria, and Actinomycetes on Leaves Decomposing in a Stream , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  M. Inui,et al.  Regulation of Expression of Cellulosomal Cellulase and Hemicellulase Genes in Clostridium cellulovorans , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[17]  P. Boon,et al.  A review of methodology used to measure leaf litter decomposition in lotic environments: Time to turn over an old leaf? , 1991 .

[18]  J. Brewer,et al.  Current and presettlement tree species composition of some upland forests in northern Mississippi1 , 2001 .

[19]  M. Gessner,et al.  Decomposition of diverse litter mixtures in streams. , 2007, Ecology.

[20]  J. Meyer,et al.  Organic Matter Budgets for Streams: A Synthesis , 1997, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[21]  S. Morris.  Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial biomass in southern Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns , 1999 .

[22]  M. Graça,et al.  Leaf litter processing in low order streams , 2006, Limnetica.

[23]  Richard K. Johnson,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment on boreal streams: invertebrates, fungi and leaf‐litter breakdown , 2007 .

[24]  R. Chróst.  Microbial Enzymes in Aquatic Environments , 1991, Brock/Springer Series in Contemporary Bioscience.

[25]  I. Kataeva,et al.  Feruloyl Esterase Activity of the Clostridium thermocellum Cellulosome Can Be Attributed to Previously Unknown Domains of XynY and XynZ , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[26]  K. Wantzen,et al.  Leaf-litter decomposition in an Amazonian floodplain stream: effects of seasonal hydrological changes , 2006, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[27]  M. Palmer,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SUBSTRATE HETEROGENEITY ON BIOFILM METABOLISM IN A STREAM ECOSYSTEM , 2002 .

[28]  Jeanne Marvig,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF STREAM MICROFUNGI IN CONTROLLING BREAKDOWN RATES OF LEAF LITTER' , 2007 .

[29]  M. Cottrell,et al.  Bacterial Community Structure of Biofilms on Artificial Surfaces in an Estuary , 2006, Microbial Ecology.

[30]  Jackson R. Webster,et al.  VASCULAR PLANT BREAKDOWN IN FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS , 1986 .

[31]  Merja Penttilä,et al.  Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. , 2005, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[32]  S. Lindow,et al.  Microbiology of the Phyllosphere , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[33]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Extracellular Enzyme Activity Beneath Temperate Trees Growing Under Elevated Carbon Dioxide and Ozone , 2002 .

[34]  C. Jackson,et al.  Microbial activity and decomposition of fine particulate organic matter in a Louisiana cypress swamp , 2007, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[35]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Allocation of extracellular enzymatic activity in relation to litter composition, N deposition, and mass loss , 2002 .

[36]  C. Shearer,et al.  COMPARISON OF THREE TECHNIQUES FOR THE STUDY OF AQUATIC HYPHOMYCETE COMMUNITIES , 1983 .

[37]  Sohei Kobayashi,et al.  Hot spots of leaf breakdown within a headwater stream reach: comparing breakdown rates among litter patch types with different macroinvertebrate assemblages , 2005 .

[38]  M. Callisto,et al.  Leaf breakdown in two tropical streams: Differences between single and mixed species packs , 2007 .

[39]  Sohei Kobayashi,et al.  Litter patch types determine macroinvertebrate assemblages in pools of a Japanese headwater stream , 2004, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[40]  R. Bilonick.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics , 1989 .

[41]  Gyula Záray,et al.  Chemical and biological characterisation of biofilms formed on different substrata in Tisza river (Hungary). , 2006, Environmental pollution.

[42]  F. Bärlocher,et al.  Leaf surface roughness influences colonization success of aquatic hyphomycete conidia , 2008 .

[43]  R. Sinsabaugh,et al.  Enzymic analysis of microbial pattern and process , 2004, Biology and Fertility of Soils.

[44]  A. Chamier,et al.  The spatial distribution of fungi on decomposing alder leaves in a freshwater stream , 1984, Oecologia.

[45]  L. Leff,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Response of Stream Bacteria to Sources of Dissolved Organic Carbon in a Blackwater Stream System , 1997 .

[46]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Interactions of bacteria and fungi on decomposing litter: differential extracellular enzyme activities. , 2006, Ecology.

[47]  H. Paerl,et al.  A mini-review of microbial consortia: Their roles in aquatic production and biogeochemical cycling , 2004, Microbial Ecology.

[48]  F. Guérold,et al.  Leaf litter breakdown budgets in streams of various trophic status: effects of dissolved inorganic nutrients on microorganisms and invertebrates , 2007 .

[49]  Michael Edward Hohn,et al.  An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics: by Edward H. Isaaks and R. Mohan Srivastava, 1989, Oxford University Press, New York, 561 p., ISBN 0-19-505012-6, ISBN 0-19-505013-4 (paperback), $55.00 cloth, $35.00 paper (US) , 1991 .

[50]  S. Lindow,et al.  Quorum size of Pseudomonas syringae is small and dictated by water availability on the leaf surface , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  J. Goksøyr,et al.  Effects of water fluctuations on microbial mass and activity in soil , 1980, Microbial Ecology.

[52]  M. Gessner,et al.  IMPORTANCE OF STREAM MICROFUNGI IN CONTROLLING BREAKDOWN RATES OF LEAF LITTER , 1994 .

[53]  C. Jackson,et al.  Changes in the phyllosphere community of the resurrection fern, Polypodium polypodioides, associated with rainfall and wetting. , 2006, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[54]  M. Bradford,et al.  Nonadditive effects of leaf litter species diversity on breakdown dynamics in a detritus-based stream. , 2007, Ecology.