Brain Imaging and Privacy

I will argue that the fairly common assumption that brain imaging may compromise people’s privacy in an undesirable way only if moral crimes are committed is false. Sometimes persons’ privacy is compromised because of failures of privacy. A normal emotional reaction to failures of privacy is embarrassment and shame, not moral resentment like in the cases of violations of right to privacy. I will claim that if (1) neuroimaging will provide all kinds of information about persons’ inner life and not only information that is intentionally searched for, and (2) there will be more and more application fields of fMRI and more and more people whose brains will be scanned (without any coercion), then, in the future, shame may be an unfortunately common feeling in our culture. This is because failures of privacy may dramatically increase. A person may feel shame strongly and long, especially if his failure is witnessed by people who he considers relatively important, but less than perfectly trustworthy.

[1]  W. Parent Privacy, morality, and the law , 1985 .

[2]  F. Baylis,et al.  Brains, Genes, and the Making of the Self , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[3]  Richard A. Wasserstrom,et al.  Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: Privacy: some arguments and assumptions , 1984 .

[4]  Joseph R Simpson,et al.  Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true? , 2008, The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.

[5]  Andrei Marmor Philosophy of Law , 2011 .

[6]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Neuroscience and the Law , 2005 .

[7]  Bernard Williams,et al.  Shame and Necessity , 1995, The Classical Review.

[8]  Judy Illes,et al.  Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology—the ethical terrain , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Gabriele Taylor,et al.  Pride, shame and guilt : emotions of self assessment , 1988 .

[10]  Thomas Nagel,et al.  Concealment and Exposure , 1998 .

[11]  G. Kahane Brain imaging and the inner life , 2008, The Lancet.

[12]  J. Räikkä On Irrational Guilt , 2005 .

[13]  Stacey A. Tovino The Confidentiality and Privacy Implications of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[14]  J. Velleman The Genesis of Shame , 2001 .

[15]  F. Schoeman Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology , 1984 .

[16]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  G. Simmel The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[18]  J. Rachels Why privacy is important , 1985 .

[19]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[20]  Paul Root Wolpe,et al.  Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implications. , 2004, The Hastings Center report.

[21]  E. Goffman The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[22]  F. Schoeman,et al.  Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: Privacy and intimate information , 1984 .

[23]  R. Gavison Privacy and the Limits of Law , 1980 .

[24]  I. Kant Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view , 1974 .

[25]  E. Goffman Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-To-Face Behavior , 1967 .

[26]  M. Farah,et al.  Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  D. Kennedy Neuroscience and Neuroethics , 2004, Science.

[28]  Jeroen van den Hoven,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy , 2008 .

[29]  Is Information All We Need to Protect , 2008 .

[30]  Herman T. Tavani,et al.  Floridi’s ontological theory of informational privacy: Some implications and challenges , 2008, Ethics and Information Technology.

[31]  Dean Cocking,et al.  Information Technology and Moral Philosophy: Plural Selves and Relational Identity: Intimacy and Privacy Online , 2008 .

[32]  Ian R. Kerr,et al.  Emanations, Snoop Dogs and Reasonable Expectation of Privacy , 2007 .

[33]  Dean P. Foster,et al.  Brain Imaging and Brain Privacy: A Realistic Concern? , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  J. Kulynych,et al.  Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[35]  R. Posner Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An economic theory of privacy , 1984 .

[36]  P. Ekman Telling lies: clues to deceit in the marketplace , 1985 .

[37]  G. Fischbach,et al.  The Brain Doesn't Lie , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.

[38]  Judy Illes,et al.  Imaging or Imagining? A Neuroethics Challenge Informed by Genetics , 2005, The American journal of bioethics : AJOB.