Semantic interoperability platform for Healthcare Information Exchange

Objectives: An important barrier to electronic healthcare information exchanges (HIE) is the lack of interoperability between information systems especially on the semantic level. In the scope of the ANR (Agence Nationale pour la Recherche)/TeRSan (Terminology and Data Elements Repositories for Healthcare Interoperability) project, we propose to set and use a semantic interoperability platform, based on semantic web technologies, in order to facilitate standardized healthcare information exchanges between heterogeneous Electronic Healthcare Records (EHRs) in different care settings. Material and methods: The platform is a standard-based expressive and scalable semantic interoperability framework. It includes centrally managed Common Data Elements bounded to international/national reference terminologies such as ICD10, CCAM, SNOMED CT, ICD-O, LOINC and PathLex. It offers semantic services such as dynamic mappings between reference and local terminologies. Results: A pilot implementation of semantic services was developed and evaluated within an HIE prototype in telepathology for remote expert advice. The semantic services developed for transcoding local terms into reference terms take into account the type of message and the exchange context defined within standard-based integration profiles. Conclusion: The TeRSan platform is an innovative semantic interoperability framework that (1) provides standard-based semantic services applicable to any HIE infrastructure and (2) preserves the use of local terminologies and local models by end users (health professionals' priority).

[1]  Heiner Stuckenschmidt,et al.  Ontology-Based Integration of Information - A Survey of Existing Approaches , 2001, OIS@IJCAI.

[2]  J. Euzenat,et al.  Ontology Matching , 2007, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[3]  C. Schoen,et al.  A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. , 2012, Health affairs.

[4]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[5]  Alon Y. Halevy,et al.  Semantic Integration Research in the Database Community : A Brief Survey , 2005 .

[6]  Natalya F. Noy,et al.  Semantic integration: a survey of ontology-based approaches , 2004, SGMD.

[7]  Nhan V. Do,et al.  The military health system's personal health record pilot with Microsoft HealthVault and Google Health , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  Alan L. Rector,et al.  Binding Ontologies & Coding Systems to Electronic Health Records and Messages , 2006, KR-MED.

[9]  Marco Eichelberg,et al.  A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards , 2005, CSUR.

[10]  Yannis Kalfoglou,et al.  Ontology mapping: the state of the art , 2003, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[11]  Csongor Nyulas,et al.  BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Kim M. Unertl,et al.  Health information exchange technology on the front lines of healthcare: workflow factors and patterns of use , 2011, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[13]  Yildiray Kabak,et al.  Artemis: Deploying semantically enriched Web services in the healthcare domain , 2006, Inf. Syst..

[14]  Charles N Mead,et al.  Data interchange standards in healthcare IT--computable semantic interoperability: now possible but still difficult, do we really need a better mousetrap? , 2006, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.