The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns
暂无分享,去创建一个
John M. Bell | R. Mitchell | J. D. Karron | Randall J. Mitchell | Jeffrey D. Karron | Karsten G. Holmquist | J. M. Bell | K. Holmquist
[1] A. Brody,et al. Effects of experimental manipulation of inflorescence size on pollination and pre-dispersal seed predation in the hummingbird-pollinated plant Ipomopsis aggregata , 1997, Oecologia.
[2] M. Pettersson,et al. Pollination by a guild of fluctuating moth populations : option for unspecialization in Silene vulgaris , 1991 .
[3] A. Agresti. An introduction to categorical data analysis , 1997 .
[4] R. Mitchell. Effects of Floral Traits, Pollinator Visitation, and Plant Size on Ipomopsis aggregata Fruit Production , 1994, The American Naturalist.
[5] S. Higashi,et al. Effects of inflorescence size on visits from pollinators and seed set of Corydalis ambigua (Papaveraceae) , 1994, Oecologia.
[6] T. Yahara,et al. Effects of variation in flower number on pollinator visits in Cirsium purpuratum (Asteraceae). , 1998, American journal of botany.
[7] M. Macnair,et al. The effects of floral display size on pollinator service to individual flowers of Myosotis and Mimulus , 1995 .
[8] H. Dreisig. Ideal free distributions of nectar foraging bumblebees , 1995 .
[9] P. Klinkhamer,et al. Effects of plant size, plant density and sex differential nectar reward on pollinator visitation in the protandrous Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae). , 1990 .
[10] T. Yahara,et al. Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits , 2001 .
[11] L. Galloway,et al. The Contribution of Display Size and Dichogamy to Potential Geitonogamy in Campanula americana , 2002, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[12] J. Thomson,et al. Heterogeneity Among Floral Visitors Leads to Discordance Between Removal and Deposition of Pollen , 1991 .
[13] L. Harder,et al. Mating cost of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants , 1995, Nature.
[14] J. Cresswell,et al. Predicted pollen dispersal by honey-bees and three species of bumble-bees foraging on oil-seed rape : a comparison of three models , 1995 .
[15] J. D. Karron,et al. The influence of population density on outcrossing rates in Mimulus ringens , 1995, Heredity.
[16] J C Stout. Does size matter? Bumblebee behaviour and the pollination of Cytisus scoparius L. (Fabaceae) , 2000 .
[17] G. Pyke,et al. Optimal foraging in bumblebees and coevolution with their plants , 2004, Oecologia.
[18] N. Waser. A comparison of distances flown by different visitors to flowers of the same species , 1982, Oecologia.
[19] Dave Goulson,et al. Why do pollinators visit proportionally fewer flowers in large patches , 2000 .
[20] P. Klinkhamer,et al. Direct and indirect estimates of the selfing rate in small and large individuals of the bumblebee pollinated Cynoglossum officinale L (Boraginaceae). , 1999, Ecology letters.
[21] A. Robertson. The relationship between floral display size, pollen carryover and geitonogamy in Myosotis colensoi (Kirk) Macbride (Boraginaceae) , 1992 .
[22] James D. Thomson,et al. Trapline foraging by bumblebees: I. Persistence of flight-path geometry , 1996 .
[23] C. Eckert. CONTRIBUTIONS OF AUTOGAMY AND GEITONOGAMY TO SELF-FERTILIZATION IN A MASS-FLOWERING, CLONAL PLANT , 2000 .
[24] L. Harder,et al. Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: The effects of floral design and display on pollinator economics and pollen dispersal , 2001 .
[25] J. Thomson. Effects of variation in inflorescence size and floral rewards on the visitation rates of traplining pollinators ofAralia hispida , 2005, Evolutionary Ecology.
[26] P. Schmid-Hempel,et al. Effects of inflorescence size on pollination in Epilobium angustifolium , 1988 .
[27] J. Cresswell. How and why do nectar-foraging bumblebees initiate movements between inflorescences of wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa (Lamiaceae)? , 1990, Oecologia.
[28] L. Harder,et al. Effects of flower number and position on self-fertilization in experimental populations of Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae) , 1994 .
[29] P. Klinkhamer,et al. Plant size and pollinator visitation in Cynoglossum officinale , 1989 .
[30] Y. Linhart. Ecological and Behavioral Determinants of Pollen Dispersal in Hummingbird- Pollinated Heliconia , 1973, The American Naturalist.
[31] V. Eckhart. The effects of floral display on pollinator visitation vary among populations ofPhacelia linearis (Hydrophyllaceae) , 1991, Evolutionary Ecology.
[32] Clayton M. Hodges. Bumble Bee Foraging: The Threshold Departure Rule , 1985 .
[33] J C Stout,et al. Floral display size in comfrey, Symphytum officinale L. (Boraginaceae): relationships with visitation by three bumblebee species and subsequent seed set , 1998, Oecologia.
[34] T. Yahara,et al. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution , 2002 .
[35] A. Snow,et al. The Ecology of Geitonogamous Pollination , 1996 .
[36] D. G. Lloyd,et al. Self- and Cross-Fertilization in Plants. I. Functional Dimensions , 1992, International Journal of Plant Sciences.
[37] P. Klinkhamer,et al. Effects of Nectar Content on the Number of Bumblebee Approaches and the Length of Visitation Sequences in Echium vulgare (Boraginaceae) , 1999 .
[38] J. D. Karron,et al. Outcrossing rates of individual Mimulus ringens genets are correlated with anther–stigma separation , 1997, Heredity.
[39] Michele R. Dudash,et al. Plant Size Effects on Female and Male Function in Hermaphroditic Sabatia Angularis (Gentianaceae) , 1991 .
[40] J. D. Karron,et al. Comparison of pollinator flight movements and gene dispersal patterns in Mimulus ringens , 1995, Heredity.
[41] L. Chittka,et al. Cognitive Ecology of Pollination: Pollinator individuality: when does it matter? , 2001 .
[42] Michael J. Crawley,et al. GLIM for Ecologists , 1994 .
[43] R. Mitchell,et al. The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens , 2004, Heredity.
[44] N. Waser,et al. Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing. , 1993, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[45] J. Craig. Seed set in Phormium: interactive effects of pollinator behaviour, pollen carryover and pollen source , 1989, Oecologia.