Should we pretreat solid waste prior to anaerobic digestion? An assessment of its environmental cost.

Many studies have shown the effectiveness of pretreatments prior to anaerobic digestion of solid wastes, but to our knowledge, none analyzes their environmental consequences/costs. In this work, seven different pretreatments applied to two types of waste (kitchen waste and sewage sludge) have been environmentally evaluated by using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The results show that the environmental burdens associated to the application of pretreatments prior to anaerobic digestion cannot be excluded. Among the options tested, the pressurize-depressurize and chemical (acid or alkaline) pretreatments could be recommended on the basis of their beneficial net environmental performance, while thermal and ozonation alternatives require energy efficiency optimization to reduce their environmental burdens. Reconciling operational, economic and environmental aspects in a holistic approach for the selection of the most sustainable option, mechanical (e.g., pressurize-depressurize) and chemical methods appear to be the most appropriate alternatives at this stage.

[1]  Shane Ward,et al.  Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways , 2010 .

[2]  Patrick Rousseaux,et al.  An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios , 2002 .

[3]  Julian Cleary,et al.  Life cycle assessments of municipal solid waste management systems: a comparative analysis of selected peer-reviewed literature. , 2009, Environment international.

[4]  S Soda,et al.  Model analysis of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of sewage sludge treatment systems with different processes and scales. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[5]  S. Gheewala,et al.  Life cycle assessment of MSW-to-energy schemes in Thailand , 2007 .

[6]  P. Raymond,et al.  Inputs of fossil carbon from wastewater treatment plants to U.S. rivers and oceans. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[8]  Marta Carballa,et al.  Influence of Different Pretreatments on Anaerobically Digested Sludge Characteristics: Suitability for Final Disposal , 2009 .

[9]  G. Dóka Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services , 2003 .

[10]  Jingxing Ma,et al.  Enhanced biomethanation of kitchen waste by different pre-treatments. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[11]  Michael Zwicky Hauschild,et al.  Comparison of Three Different LCIA Methods: EDIP97, CML2001 and Eco-indicator 99 , 2003 .

[12]  Gregory M Peters,et al.  Environmental comparison of biosolids management systems using life cycle assessment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  M D Bovea,et al.  Environmental assessment of alternative municipal solid waste management strategies. A Spanish case study. , 2010, Waste management.

[14]  LOUISE SÖRME,et al.  Capacity to Influence Sources of Heavy Metals to Wastewater Treatment Sludge , 2003, Environmental management.

[15]  Patrizia Buttol,et al.  An environmental LCA of alternative scenarios of urban sewage sludge treatment and disposal , 2007 .

[16]  P Mostbauer,et al.  Climate balance of biogas upgrading systems. , 2010, Waste management.

[17]  M. Carballa,et al.  Environmental assessment of anaerobically digested sludge reuse in agriculture: potential impacts of emerging micropollutants. , 2010, Water research.

[18]  A. Hospido,et al.  Environmental Evaluation of Different Treatment Processes for Sludge from Urban Wastewater Treatments: Anaerobic Digestion versus Thermal Processes (10 pp) , 2005 .

[19]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: a case study from China. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  M. Carballa,et al.  Comparison between the conventional anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and its combination with a chemical or thermal pre-treatment concerning the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  P. Christensen,et al.  Eco-toxicological impact of “metals” on the aquatic and terrestrial ecosystem: A comparison between eight different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[22]  P. Jeníček,et al.  Improvement of anaerobic digestion of sludge. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[23]  Guang-qing Liu,et al.  Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. , 2007, Bioresource technology.

[24]  J. Baeyens,et al.  Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge , 2008 .

[25]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[26]  M. Carballa,et al.  Influence of ozone pre-treatment on sludge anaerobic digestion: removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. , 2007, Chemosphere.

[27]  J. Müller,et al.  Prospects and problems of sludge pre-treatment processes. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  Ki-in Choi,et al.  Evaluation of environmental burdens caused by changes of food waste management systems in Seoul, Korea. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[29]  Jung-Wk Kim,et al.  Comparison through a LCA evaluation analysis of food waste disposal options from the perspective of global warming and resource recovery. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[30]  S. I. Pérez-Elvira,et al.  Sludge minimisation technologies , 2006 .

[31]  H. Carrère,et al.  Pretreatment methods to improve sludge anaerobic degradability: a review. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[32]  Hsien Hui Khoo,et al.  Food waste conversion options in Singapore: environmental impacts based on an LCA perspective. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[33]  Marta Carballa,et al.  Fate of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. , 2007, Water research.

[34]  Yunqin Lin,et al.  Alkali pretreatment enhances biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper sludge. , 2009, Journal of hazardous materials.

[35]  M. T. Moreira,et al.  A comparison of municipal wastewater treatment plants for big centres of population in Galicia (Spain) , 2007 .

[36]  P. Christensen,et al.  Impacts of “metals” on human health: a comparison between nine different methodologies for Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) , 2011 .

[37]  Giovanni De Feo,et al.  The use of LCA in selecting the best MSW management system. , 2009, Waste management.

[38]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[39]  R L Droste,et al.  Comprehensive review and compilation of pretreatments for mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.